RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/15/2016 3:43:23 PM)


quote:

Your incessant reliance on references to "post-structuralism," a bizarre invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts, demonstrates nothing so much as your inability to distinguish between ideology and reality, one might even fairly say between gobbledygook and reality.


It isn't an invention of 'leftists', K. This stuff goes way beyond 'left' and 'right'. And nobody with more than a passing acquaintanceship with post-structuralism would say anything as simplistic as to suggest that someone can't distinguish between 'ideology and reality' ... because those are two of the most fundamental things that post-structuralists - indeed philosophers in general - consider problematic. What you're saying doesn't make sense, in short.




Kirata -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/15/2016 3:49:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Your incessant reliance on references to "post-structuralism," a bizarre invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts, demonstrates nothing so much as your inability to distinguish between ideology and reality, one might even fairly say between gobbledygook and reality.


It isn't an invention of 'leftists', K. This stuff goes way beyond 'left' and 'right'. And nobody with more than a passing acquaintanceship with post-structuralism would say anything as simplistic as to suggest that someone can't distinguish between 'ideology and reality' ... because those are two of the most fundamental things that post-structuralists - indeed philosophers in general - consider problematic. What you're saying doesn't make sense, in short.

For fuck's sake, I didn't say it was an "invention of leftists". I said it was an evidence-free invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts. When you can't oppose what I actually said, with the quote right in front of you, it's time to stop digging.

K.




PeonForHer -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/15/2016 4:12:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

For fuck's sake, I didn't say it was an "invention of leftists". I said it was an evidence-free invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts. When you can't oppose what I actually said, with the quote right in front of you, it's time to stop digging.



It isn't an 'evidence-free' invention of leftists either, K. But ... you should know this - because you're left wing yourself, aren't you?




Kirata -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/15/2016 4:15:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

K.




tweakabelle -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 2:38:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

. So the big leap of faith is not as you've described ... .


I never claimed you had faith in anything. You're making that up in your head. .

It appears you are so dumb that you don't even understand your own posts.

As you clearly have no idea what you are talking about, I am not going to waste any more time on you and your childish nonsense.




tweakabelle -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 2:45:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

K.


[sm=rofl.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif]
Your claim is absurd in the face of your posting history. That history reveals you to be a far Right bigot Mr K, with paranoid delusions that you are convinced are thoughts about real events, about as neutral as Breitbart and with commensurate credibility.




Kirata -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 6:18:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

[sm=rofl.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif]
Your claim is absurd in the face of your posting history. That history reveals you to be a far Right bigot Mr K, with paranoid delusions that you are convinced are thoughts about real events, about as neutral as Breitbart and with commensurate credibility.

Yes dear, now be a good girl and change your diaper.

K.




tweakabelle -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 6:43:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Your incessant reliance on references to "post-structuralism," a bizarre invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts, demonstrates nothing so much as your inability to distinguish between ideology and reality, one might even fairly say between gobbledygook and reality.


It isn't an invention of 'leftists', K. This stuff goes way beyond 'left' and 'right'. And nobody with more than a passing acquaintanceship with post-structuralism would say anything as simplistic as to suggest that someone can't distinguish between 'ideology and reality' ... because those are two of the most fundamental things that post-structuralists - indeed philosophers in general - consider problematic. What you're saying doesn't make sense, in short.

For fuck's sake, I didn't say it was an "invention of leftists". I said it was an evidence-free invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts. When you can't oppose what I actually said, with the quote right in front of you, it's time to stop digging.

K.


What a sad evasion Mr K. If I had any expectation of your intellectual honesty I would be sadly disappointed.

Peon is absolutely correct to point out that the two concepts - 'reality' and 'ideology' you are claiming I am unable to distinguish between are two of the most problematic of terms/concepts in a post-Structuralist scheme. Peon is probably far too polite to point out that making such a nonsensical 'criticism' is a crystal clear indication that at a most basic and fundamental level, you don't understand post-Structuralist thinking. At all. Clueless.

Your loss. Entirely.

However, as I don't have any expectation of intellectual honesty from you, I am unable to report any disappointment. You like to masquerade as a 'neutral' thinker when you are one of the slyest, most persistent and most devious Right wing bigots posting here so any expectation of intellectual honesty went out the window long ago.

Best you stick to your comfort zone exploring the evidence-free spirituality and consciousness of rocks ... you seem to possess a certain affinity with rocks and other inanimate objects.




Kirata -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 8:18:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Your incessant reliance on references to "post-structuralism," a bizarre invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts, demonstrates nothing so much as your inability to distinguish between ideology and reality, one might even fairly say between gobbledygook and reality.


It isn't an invention of 'leftists', K. This stuff goes way beyond 'left' and 'right'. And nobody with more than a passing acquaintanceship with post-structuralism would say anything as simplistic as to suggest that someone can't distinguish between 'ideology and reality' ... because those are two of the most fundamental things that post-structuralists - indeed philosophers in general - consider problematic. What you're saying doesn't make sense, in short.

For fuck's sake, I didn't say it was an "invention of leftists". I said it was an evidence-free invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts. When you can't oppose what I actually said, with the quote right in front of you, it's time to stop digging.

What a sad evasion Mr K. If I had any expectation of your intellectual honesty I would be sadly disappointed.

Peon is absolutely correct to point out that the two concepts - 'reality' and 'ideology' you are claiming I am unable to distinguish between are two of the most problematic of terms/concepts in a post-Structuralist scheme. Peon is probably far too polite to point out that making such a nonsensical 'criticism' is a crystal clear indication that at a most basic and fundamental level, you don't understand post-Structuralist thinking. At all. Clueless.

Your loss. Entirely.

However, as I don't have any expectation of intellectual honesty from you, I am unable to report any disappointment. You like to masquerade as a 'neutral' thinker when you are one of the slyest, most persistent and most devious Right wing bigots posting here so any expectation of intellectual honesty went out the window long ago.

Best you stick to your comfort zone exploring the evidence-free spirituality and consciousness of rocks ... you seem to possess a certain affinity with rocks and other inanimate objects.

You should take my advice and stop digging. I am far from being the only one to view post-structuralism as a mix of nonsense and gobbledygook, as anyone who read the post in question can tell you, though I do appreciate your kindness in confirming that reality is problematic for you. But I wish you would learn to stop soiling your diaper. People expect someone your age to be toilet trained.

K.




Nnanji -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 8:22:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

. So the big leap of faith is not as you've described ... .


I never claimed you had faith in anything. You're making that up in your head. .

It appears you are so dumb that you don't even understand your own posts.

As you clearly have no idea what you are talking about, I am not going to waste any more time on you and your childish nonsense.

Thank you.

For the times I've shown you didn't know what you were talking about, such as with the Florida governor, you need this. If you look, I never said any of the things you attribute to me. But what I did say was very clear. Sorry you just can't pick it up.




Nnanji -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 8:24:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

K.


[sm=rofl.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif]
Your claim is absurd in the face of your posting history. That history reveals you to be a far Right bigot Mr K, with paranoid delusions that you are convinced are thoughts about real events, about as neutral as Breitbart and with commensurate credibility.

Exactly. He's wrong because of posting history. Wow, your logical arguments cut like a knife.




Nnanji -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 8:34:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Your incessant reliance on references to "post-structuralism," a bizarre invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts, demonstrates nothing so much as your inability to distinguish between ideology and reality, one might even fairly say between gobbledygook and reality.


It isn't an invention of 'leftists', K. This stuff goes way beyond 'left' and 'right'. And nobody with more than a passing acquaintanceship with post-structuralism would say anything as simplistic as to suggest that someone can't distinguish between 'ideology and reality' ... because those are two of the most fundamental things that post-structuralists - indeed philosophers in general - consider problematic. What you're saying doesn't make sense, in short.

For fuck's sake, I didn't say it was an "invention of leftists". I said it was an evidence-free invention of leftists, critical theorists and psychoanalysts. When you can't oppose what I actually said, with the quote right in front of you, it's time to stop digging.

What a sad evasion Mr K. If I had any expectation of your intellectual honesty I would be sadly disappointed.

Peon is absolutely correct to point out that the two concepts - 'reality' and 'ideology' you are claiming I am unable to distinguish between are two of the most problematic of terms/concepts in a post-Structuralist scheme. Peon is probably far too polite to point out that making such a nonsensical 'criticism' is a crystal clear indication that at a most basic and fundamental level, you don't understand post-Structuralist thinking. At all. Clueless.

Your loss. Entirely.

However, as I don't have any expectation of intellectual honesty from you, I am unable to report any disappointment. You like to masquerade as a 'neutral' thinker when you are one of the slyest, most persistent and most devious Right wing bigots posting here so any expectation of intellectual honesty went out the window long ago.

Best you stick to your comfort zone exploring the evidence-free spirituality and consciousness of rocks ... you seem to possess a certain affinity with rocks and other inanimate objects.

You should take my advice and stop digging. I am far from being the only one to view post-structuralism as a mix of nonsense and gobbledygook, as anyone who read the post in question can tell you, though I do appreciate your kindness in confirming that reality is problematic for you. But I wish you would learn to stop soiling your diaper. People expect someone your age to be toilet trained.

K.


You sly thing.

But then I remind you of post 10:

No doubt Twink will be along shortly to babble incoherently. Upon fact-checking her narrative, it will probably be either completely unsupported by science or rest upon a misinterpretation of actual science put through the filter of her unhinged-by-acid monkey-brain.

As I see it she's saying nobody knows the truth (because as awareness points out its all made up anyway and not measurable) but she knows the truth and you are just sly. And she knows the truth much better than I because I'm just a waste of time. And we should all just shut up and let her reign in the forum.

Sweet job for her if she can get it.

(in reply to Kirata)

(in reply to Kirata)




Kirata -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 8:57:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

[sm=rofl.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif]
Your claim is absurd in the face of your posting history. That history reveals you to be a far Right bigot Mr K, with paranoid delusions that you are convinced are thoughts about real events, about as neutral as Breitbart and with commensurate credibility.

Exactly. He's wrong because of posting history. Wow, your logical arguments cut like a knife.

Yeah, my posting history. There's a hoot. Apparently in her world "far Right bigots" can be counted upon to advocate for single-payer (here and here), argue for stricter requirements on CCW licenses (here and here), and propose progressive tax codes that would give a Socialist a wet dream (here), albeit not for purposes of wealth redistribution.

But hey, that's tweakabelle. You can do the math.

K.




vincentML -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 9:48:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

No, you just lack the faculties necessary to engage in debate. You simply repeat the mantra that "black is white" and are unable to argue effectively. You lie, you dissemble and you're a racist. Consequently, you're a waste of time.

You shy from the indictment I gave of your racists remarks:

meow . . . pussy . . . can't defend yourself so away you run.

Fucking coward [:'(]




tweakabelle -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/16/2016 11:35:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

[sm=rofl.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif]
Your claim is absurd in the face of your posting history. That history reveals you to be a far Right bigot Mr K, with paranoid delusions that you are convinced are thoughts about real events, about as neutral as Breitbart and with commensurate credibility.

Yeah, my posting history.

K.


Yes Your posting history. Such as this gem:
"When class warfare never really got off the ground in a prosperous country like the United States, a bunch of neo-Marxists realized that any division in a society could be manipulated to bring it down and pave the way for their Socialist utopia. Gender, race, anything would do. But here in America, fomenting racial hatred would seem to be the most promising strategy. They've even managed to convince a cadre of useful whites to join the battle against insidious "white evil" in the name of all that is noble and good.
Kirata's post #123 @ http://www.collarchat.com/m_4963526/mpage_7/key_Jim%252CCrow/tm.htm#4964588

Or your outrage at proposals to remove the offensive racist confederate flag in Sth Carolina after Dylan Roof's massacre of 9 blacks in a church there. Or your inability to discover any anti-black racism in the US but you can find so much racism against whites you even start threads about it ....

I could go on but no leftie nor centrist in their right minds would adopt any of those positions, let alone author the idiotic rant of yours that I have just re-posted above.

You are a right wing bigot.




Kirata -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/17/2016 1:13:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

you're left wing yourself, aren't you?

I call'em as I see'em, Peon. You should know that by now. Sometimes I favor one side's position, sometimes the other's, and sometimes neither.

[sm=rofl.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif][sm=pigsfly.gif]
Your claim is absurd in the face of your posting history. That history reveals you to be a far Right bigot Mr K, with paranoid delusions that you are convinced are thoughts about real events, about as neutral as Breitbart and with commensurate credibility.

Yeah, my posting history.

Yes Your posting history. Such as this gem:

"When class warfare never really got off the ground in a prosperous country like the United States, a bunch of neo-Marxists realized that any division in a society could be manipulated to bring it down and pave the way for their Socialist utopia. Gender, race, anything would do. But here in America, fomenting racial hatred would seem to be the most promising strategy. They've even managed to convince a cadre of useful whites to join the battle against insidious "white evil" in the name of all that is noble and good.
Kirata's post #123 @ http://www.collarchat.com/m_4963526/mpage_7/key_Jim%252CCrow/tm.htm#4964588

Like I said to Peon, sometimes I favor one side's view, sometimes the other's, sometimes neither. And in any case, what about that qualifies someone as a "far Right bigot"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Or your outrage at proposals to remove the offensive racist confederate flag in Sth Carolina after Dylan Roof's massacre of 9 blacks in a church there.

I don't know about "outrage," but yes I think removing symbols of the Confederacy is ridiculous. There was more to the South than just slavery, and Southern culture is part of our heritage. What about that qualifies someone as a "far Right bigot"?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Or your inability to discover any anti-black racism in the US but you can find so much racism against whites you even start threads about it ....

I have never had any difficulty recognizing anti-black racism where it exists, and I don't recall starting a thread about anti-white racism, let alone threads in the plural. But if I did start one, good for me. Why not? It's just as racist as any other form of racism.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

I could go on but no leftie nor centrist in their right minds would adopt any of those positions, let alone author the idiotic rant of yours that I have just re-posted above.

You are a right wing bigot.

And you are a liar. In addition to which, you trimmed the post you're replying to, excising the links to me taking positions congenial to the Left, doubtless since that would support my contention that I call 'em as I see 'em. But not to worry, I'll save you the trouble:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Yeah, my posting history. There's a hoot. Apparently in her world "far Right bigots" can be counted upon to advocate for single-payer (here and here), argue for stricter requirements on CCW licenses (here and here), and propose progressive tax codes that would give a Socialist a wet dream (here), albeit not for purposes of wealth redistribution.

But hey, that's tweakabelle. You can do the math.

Like I said. I call 'em as I see 'em and you are a liar. Now go change your diaper, and the next time you want to argue try arguing to the point instead of behaving like a middle-aged juvenile and crapping yourself.

K.





tweakabelle -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/17/2016 1:50:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

"When class warfare never really got off the ground in a prosperous country like the United States, a bunch of neo-Marxists realized that any division in a society could be manipulated to bring it down and pave the way for their Socialist utopia. Gender, race, anything would do. But here in America, fomenting racial hatred would seem to be the most promising strategy. They've even managed to convince a cadre of useful whites to join the battle against insidious "white evil" in the name of all that is noble and good.
Kirata's post #123 @ http://www.collarchat.com/m_4963526/mpage_7/key_Jim%252CCrow/tm.htm#4964588

what about that qualifies someone as a "far Right bigot"?


Because only far right people think like that. It sounds like something straight out of Alex Jones or Breitbart.

No one with leftish or middle of the road sentiments would ever write such insane crap. The argument (such as it is) the points made (such as they are) are totally alien to all bar far Rightwingers. No one else thinks like that.

As for the "bigot": In all the years that I have been posting here, I cannot recall you once intervening on a race related thread on the side of anti-racists. Every time I have seen you comment it has been negative towards the anti-racist position and affirmative of the position adopted by bigots.

If it walks like a duck talks like a duck and looks like a duck, it is reasonable to conclude that it's a duck. You walk with racists, you talk like a racist and your position on every race related issue here has been indistinguishable from those of the bigots. After a certain time (and in my case it was several years before I reluctantly and sadly concluded this) it is reasonable to conclude that you are a bigot.

And all that adds up to: Your posts tell us that you are a right wing bigot.




Awareness -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/17/2016 2:16:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

No, you just lack the faculties necessary to engage in debate. You simply repeat the mantra that "black is white" and are unable to argue effectively. You lie, you dissemble and you're a racist. Consequently, you're a waste of time.

You shy from the indictment I gave of your racists remarks:

meow . . . pussy . . . can't defend yourself so away you run.

Fucking coward [:'(]
One of the interesting character defects in Islamic men is something they have in common with the Icelandic heroes of old as exemplified in tales such as "Njáls saga".

In it, these brutal warriors prove to be vulnerable to slights to their honor, with blood feuds extending for decades on the basis of such. While some make ludicrous references to "masculinity confining people in a box" it does reflect the reality where survival and the ability to keep what you possessed rested very much on your willingness to bash heads to keep it.

However, Islamic men - and indeed men in most Western societies - face no such pressure. So when someone slights an Islamic man's God or prophet, his response of "I will kill you" represents a fundamental weakness at the core of his soul. Apparently his God is unable to administer justice himself and requires the assistance of his faithful servant. Or so he'd like to believe.

So, you - an entity manifestly incapable of constructing a reasoned argument - attempts to insult me by implying weakness, I'm amused more than anything else. You're not someone admirable, someone worthy of respect - indeed your progressive descent into desperate, plaintive pleas to engage marks you out as a lonely soul who craves validation.

And I'm simply not going to give it to you.

Have a nice day.




Awareness -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/17/2016 2:35:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Or your outrage at proposals to remove the offensive racist confederate flag in Sth Carolina after Dylan Roof's massacre of 9 blacks in a church there. Or your inability to discover any anti-black racism in the US but you can find so much racism against whites you even start threads about it ....
The assertions you've made are typical Leftist fucking nonsense.

The Confederate Flag is a symbol. Symbols have power, but symbols are not racist - people are racist. Was it racist before someone massacred 9 blacks in a church or did the flag only gain racist status after that event?

I think revering the Confederate Flag is idiotic, not because it's racist, but because it represents a power structure that's been dead for 150 years. The South lost their slaves, they need to suck it up and move the fuck on.

quote:


I could go on but no leftie nor centrist in their right minds would adopt any of those positions, let alone author the idiotic rant of yours that I have just re-posted above.
This is the problem with you and Peon. You are so rigid and simple-minded. In your world there is no nuance, no shades of gray - there is only allegiance to the ideology. And that's precisely the problem. You're both slaves to an ideology you don't understand and to which you cleave because it feeds your weakness while allowing you a delusional sense of moral superiority

quote:

You are a right wing bigot.
In your mind, that's a tautology. So let's not pretend you're engaging in anything other than the usual leftist name-calling here.

Maajid Nawaz recently said that:

quote:

"Liberal" & "left" are distinct. Liberals value individual human autonomy. The left values in-group communal identity. Don't confuse liberal for left


and I think that's a pithy expression of an important distinction. You and Peon are both Leftists. And like all Leftists, totalitarianism is a short hop, skip and jump down the road from your public ideology.




Awareness -> RE: Of species, race, and ethnicity.... (11/17/2016 2:50:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
Because only far right people think like that. It sounds like something straight out of Alex Jones or Breitbart.

No one with leftish or middle of the road sentiments would ever write such insane crap. The argument (such as it is) the points made (such as they are) are totally alien to all bar far Rightwingers. No one else thinks like that.
What Kirata is referring to is a technique known as "the moral war". It's a mechanism by which a conflict - social, political or military - is justified by demonstrating the moral inferiority of your opponent.

The mobilisation of white people against their own communities - and against their own self-interest - is certainly a fascinating but somewhat idiosyncratic development in Western societies. The specious moral arguments used to justify the unreasoning approach to interracial relations are the tip of the iceberg. What is significant is the promotion of the idea that all white power is unearned and implicitly evil, instead of reflecting the reality that all tribes, nations and societies compete for power and you're just damned lucky to be on the winning side.

quote:

As for the "bigot": In all the years that I have been posting here, I cannot recall you once intervening on a race related thread on the side of anti-racists. Every time I have seen you comment it has been negative towards the anti-racist position and affirmative of the position adopted by bigots.
There's a difference between opposing racism and the kind of idiotic, unreasoning bullshit you spew on a daily basis. You don't understand the difference between xenophobia and racism, you seem to think that only white people are racist and your apprehension of the power dynamics of our societies are - to put it charitably - somewhat quaint.

quote:

If it walks like a duck talks like a duck and looks like a duck, it is reasonable to conclude that it's a duck. You walk with racists, you talk like a racist and your position on every race related issue here has been indistinguishable from those of the bigots. After a certain time (and in my case it was several years before I reluctantly and sadly concluded this) it is reasonable to conclude that you are a bigot.
You conclude everyone who fails to fall victim to your unreasoning ideology is a racist. This is because you lack both intellectual honesty as well as - to be blunt - intellectual firepower.

quote:


And all that adds up to: Your posts tell us that you are a right wing bigot.
Your posts tell us that you're unable to reason, have no understanding - let alone respect - for logic and think all arguments can be dumbed down to "my side good, your side bad, UG".

To say you're a product of the liberal arts is an understatement. You're the classic example of an idiot, educated in nonsense, who is useless to both herself and society.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625