MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgersquote:
ORIGINAL: Kirataquote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgersquote:
ORIGINAL: Kirataquote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? HERE That's just the same story, again. Where is the poll? The numbers. The methodology. Since we are talking about actual voting which is counted, what 'methodology' is required beyond calling the polling stations and asking what the numbers are ? This isn't an opinion poll but a tally. Now you're just making shit up. They didn't call the polling stations and ask what the numbers were. With 11 days to go before the U.S. presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project . . . Overall, Clinton remained on track to win a majority of votes in the Electoral College, the Reuters/Ipsos survey showed. How many people were surveyed? Where were the surveys conducted? How many locations? How many people at each location? How is anyone supposed to evaluate anything without that information. We're just being told what to think. K. HERE To be honest, I don't see how this relates to early voting even though it is a pretty good mathematical model.
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite. J K Galbraith
|