|
UllrsIshtar -> RE: Submissive Female Seeking Advice (11/18/2016 5:15:42 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl
quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl
quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka
You're right. I would.
.... and you're the one that decided i am magnificent. I am a slave... i don't think too many people think a slave is magnificent. I wonder why you do.
Why do you think all 'real women' should be perfectly submissive?
You don't understand sarcasm do you?
I'd argue that you're the one who clearly doesn't understand sarcasm.
But then again, you also clearly don't understand that in these exchanges with tamaka one of you ends up looking like a dumb bitch over and over again... and it's not the person you think.
So never mind, carry on with cluttering up the board with your personal little ever-losing vendetta of imagined wits.
Why do you like her so much when she contradicts herself and is so wrong about a lot of things?
I don't particularly like or dislike her at all. And she's not wrong anymore often than a lot of other people on this board are. If I were to dislike everybody who was wrong about some of what they said, I'd pretty much dislike 98% of the posters here.
I do dislike you. But that has nothing to do with you being right or wrong either (you and tamaka are about on par on that count, incidentally) but everything with the fact that you constantly seem to feel the need to open your big flap to make little side-track ad hominem attacks at the people you dislike, and the rare times you do actually stick to the topic enough to respond to it, you do it by going on a morally righteous witch hunt against people based on thing they never even said.
Basically... I dislike you because you are nothing but a whole bunch of silly bluster and noise, constantly derailing topics with childishness, while nothing of substance ever come out.
While I don't dislike (nor like) tamaka, because while there's a lot of nonsense coming out of her to, at least she often sticks to the topic, and sometimes she adds interesting/unusual/new perspectives, and she occasional adds substance to a thread (or leads to a topic that leads to a discussion of substance).
|
|
|
|
