Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely"

Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

RottenJohnny -> Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 10:56:36 AM)
Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards "Likely an Indictment" quote: Fox News Channel's Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI. He reveals five important new pieces of information in these two short clips: 1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year. 2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time. 3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature. 4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department. 5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html Let's see if Obama fires Comey now.

WhoreMods -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:00:36 AM)
How's the circus peanut's court case for fucking children looking?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:01:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods How's the circus peanut's court case for fucking children looking? Ask the FBI.

WhoreMods -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:05:18 AM)
They don't speak to me as I've never murdered a 'murican. Any idea why your boys are ignoring this while whining about stuff that your Presidents secretaries of state did?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:11:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods They don't speak to me as I've never murdered a 'murican. Any idea why your boys are ignoring this while whining about stuff that your Presidents secretaries of state did? My boys? I don't sign their paychecks, dumbass. All I did was post a news story. Get over yourself.

mnottertail -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:12:18 AM)
Ja, as for the OP. Pure unadulterated asswipe. If someone is going to leak something factual, they do it in reputable places, NYT, WAPost and so on. If someone is looking to push factless propaganda to the captive feebleminded they go to nutsucker slobberblogs.

heavyblinker -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:13:36 AM)
Let's see... partisan 'news' site with zero accountability, mysterious 'sources' that are probably janitors, and a Fox News Reporter who for some reason isn't reporting it for Fox News. Seems legit.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:21:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Let's see... partisan sources with zero accountability, mysterious 'sources' that are probably janitors, and a Fox News Reporter who for some reason isn't reporting it for Fox News. Seems legit. If it turns out to be bullshit then I'm sure someone from the FBI will say so.

mnottertail -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:24:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Let's see... partisan sources with zero accountability, mysterious 'sources' that are probably janitors, and a Fox News Reporter who for some reason isn't reporting it for Fox News. Seems legit. If it turns out to be bullshit then I'm sure someone from the FBI will say so. Why would they?

WhoreMods -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:26:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny My boys? I don't sign their paychecks, dumbass. All I did was post a news story. Get over yourself. You're on their team so you support what they do.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:30:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny My boys? I don't sign their paychecks, dumbass. All I did was post a news story. Get over yourself. You're on their team so you support what they do. Just how fucking retarded are you?

WhoreMods -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:31:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny My boys? I don't sign their paychecks, dumbass. All I did was post a news story. Get over yourself. You're on their team so you support what they do. Just how fucking retarded are you? Less than you are.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:35:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny My boys? I don't sign their paychecks, dumbass. All I did was post a news story. Get over yourself. You're on their team so you support what they do. Just how fucking retarded are you? Less than you are. I'm not convinced.

WhoreMods -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 11:37:03 AM)
Never mind that: are you okay with the circus peanut raping children?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 12:01:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Never mind that: are you okay with the circus peanut raping children? I'm not okay with anyone raping children. Has he been arrested for it?

mnottertail -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 12:02:28 PM)
No, has hillary been arrested? Which is more likely, Trump or Hillary for arrest? which is more likely, Trump or Hillary for president? I know you are a yooper, but you can do this.

heavyblinker -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 12:02:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Let's see... partisan information sources with zero accountability, mysterious 'sources' that are probably janitors, and a Fox News Reporter who for some reason isn't reporting it for Fox News. Seems legit. If it turns out to be bullshit then I'm sure someone from the FBI will say so. The information source you posted has zero accountability because nobody has the time, patience or energy it would need to debunk every single lie it tells. The FBI is NOT going to respond to them because they know they're a fucking joke... and so should you. I doubt they've broken any laws-- FOX does the same thing by interviewing 'climate change experts' with no scientific background whatsoever simply because they say what their target audience wants to hear. It has nothing to do with how relevant or valuable their perspective is in terms of helping you understand the issue. It's about being able to state that someone who they can describe in a legitimate-sounding way has supported their political perspective. These outlets exist only to feed you the bullshit you want to hear in order to get your indignation fix. They know that in a few days you won't care that what they said was a lie, because your attention will be focused on a brand new piece of bullshit that produces the same effect. That momentary thrill is all you will care about, which is exactly what is happening now. I'm not saying I haven't also been guilty of compulsively checking the news to see what brand new shitstorm is joining this mother of all shitstorms... but seriously, the reality is already sensational enough without having to bring conspiracy sites and other fake news sites into the mix.

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 12:08:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker The information source you posted has zero accountability because nobody has the time, patience or energy it would need to debunk every single lie it tells. The FBI is NOT going to respond to them because they know they're a fucking joke... and so should you. They exist only to feed you the bullshit you want to hear in order to get your indignation fix. They know that in a few days you won't care that what they said was a lie, because your attention will be focused on a brand new lie that produces the same effect. That momentary thrill is all you will care about, which is exactly what is happening now. I'm not saying I haven't also been guilty of compulsively checking the news to see what brand new shitstorm is joining this mother of all shitstorms... but seriously, the reality is already sensational enough without having to bring conspiracy sites and other fake news sites into the mix. Whatever, dude. I posted a news story. Take it however you want.

heavyblinker -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 12:13:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny Whatever, dude. I posted a news story. Take it however you want. Do you care if it's true or not, or do you just like what it had to say?

RottenJohnny -> RE: Clinton Foundation Pay-For-Play Indictment "Likely" (11/3/2016 12:37:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Do you care if it's true or not, or do you just like what it had to say? I posted a news story. If it's true then it's very interesting. If it's false then I expect someone from the FBI will say so. My only comment was about Comey. Are you capable of understanding that or not?

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.785156E-02