Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/22/2016 8:56:50 PM   
LadyDemura


Posts: 141
Joined: 2/12/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Motty


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyDemura
There is no immigration clause in the Constitution. Our state likes Mexican immigrants. They do jobs like picking crops no one else is willing to do. There would be some support in this state if ALL immigration was banned. The H1B Visa program makes it very hard for recent college graduates to find jobs in Silicon Valley...


Do you think that's because brown people lack the cognitive skills that whites have, which are required to do construction jobs or go into sales, do factory work, or even wait tables?

How racist are you.


No, quite the contrary. The value of hard work seems to be instilled in the Mexican people at cultural level. Working class white people are generally a bunch of slackers that blame all their problems on others. It's not surprising no one wants to hire them.

(in reply to Motty)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/23/2016 8:35:44 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Motty
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyDemura
There is no immigration clause in the Constitution. Our state likes Mexican immigrants. They do jobs like picking crops no one else is willing to do. There would be some support in this state if ALL immigration was banned. The H1B Visa program makes it very hard for recent college graduates to find jobs in Silicon Valley...

Do you think that's because brown people lack the cognitive skills that whites have, which are required to do construction jobs or go into sales, do factory work, or even wait tables?
How racist are you.


Welcome to the Dungeon, dipshit Motty.

You apparently missed this part: "no one else is willing to do." It's not that "browns" can't do something (unless they are from Cleveland, but that's a totally different story), bu that they are willing to do whatever is available to make it here. It's actually quite an example of hard work getting you places.

It's almost as if they actually believe in the "American Dream" and are actively making it work. Whodathunkit?


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Motty)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/23/2016 8:40:18 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
But, to speak to bounty's point, the GOP is beholden to the Constitution probably only means they have to mention the Constitution, but not necessarily follow it.

no, although that might be the case in some instances, I essentially mean this as a starting place:
...
for the republicans, this is supposed to mean their thoughts/actions are grounded in the constitution, for democrats, this means leaving it behind in pursuit of utopia.


That was my point, bounty, it is supposed to mean their thoughts and actions are grounded in the Constitution. However, for most cases, it's little more than lip service. The only time the Constitution really matters to the GOP, is when they can use the Constitution to oppose the Democrats.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/23/2016 8:40:26 AM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline 		Excellent examples.
Any libtards thinking DJT cannot fuck states/cities almost at will is whistling past the graveyard.
Withhold highway funding from states giving driver's licenses to illegals? Check.
And the list will go on and on and on....
Sanctuary cities will be a thing of the past by July 4t

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/23/2016 9:01:28 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		And the huge federal government in your bedroom nutsuckers show themselves as they really are. Again.

its all about the individualism and adherence to the constitution they say, but it obviously is nutsucker double speak.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/23/2016 9:01:34 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		I am not familiar with how the financing is done in an america

so a basic paragraph would be nice not a fuking book less you want thrashed with it.....

Come to think of it how is it did in the UK?

Fuked if I know....I know the SNP froze the council tax in Scotland for a few years. Something I disagree with.

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 11/23/2016 9:10:23 AM >

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 11/23/2016 9:18:49 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Typical


You're right. It IS typical for you to ignore that it wasn't just the Republicans screwing up. Worse yet, it seems the Democrats that were screwing up knew they were screwing up and did it anyway.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/feb/15/whos-blame-flint-water-crisis/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis#State_of_emergency_and_emergency_responses

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20160124/BLOG007/160129941/opinion-buck-stops-with-snyder-but-heres-whom-to-really-blame-in

Flint mayor said she hoped the line replacement would be finished in one year. That started in March of this year.

There was also an estimate of having all the pipes (not just the City's service pipes, but also the residential pipes) replaced could take up to 15 years.

I'm glad the State is still required to provide bottled water to those who do not have a (verified) working filter or who have decided to opt out.

quote:

As for laws/bills being ruled unconstitutional how about four just in the last year(Texas, Kansas, and Wisconsin)
http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/capitol_report/oklahoma-senate-passes-bill-to-make-it-a-felony-to/article_2ffd21c9-ce55-50f6-ada1-99c3a8f9bc66.html
3 states, Texas, Kansas WIsconsin oh and NC
http://www.collarchat.com/m_4934960/mpage_3/key_voter%252Claws/tm.htm#4935286
http://globalnews.ca/news/2857836/voter-id-law-pushed-by-republicans-in-3-states-ruled-unconstitutional/
drug testing.... unconstitutional
Banning sharia law
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/02/has-your-state-banned-sharia-map
Abortion laws repeatedly.


I admit my focus was solely on laws passed on the Federal level. That was my error.

quote:

But no, Im not going to name them all, I have much better things to do than answer my own question with a few examples. When other people reject facts thats their problem and I have no desire to pander to ignorance, well, more than three times a day.


Of course you won't. Even though I admit my error, if you make a statement and get called out on it, shouldn't it be expected for you to back your statement up?

Nah. Of course not. That's only for those of us who don't agree with you.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 12/21/2016 7:54:58 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		~FR~

Heard an interesting piece where, in the face of state and federal gridlock, cities are stepping up to take matters into their own hands, which may make cities new power centers in the US.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 12/21/2016 8:44:17 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline 		Now that could turn certain "football" matches really ugly, couldn't it?
(Wasn't there talk of New York seceding from the Union as an independent city-state during the civil war?)

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary - 12/21/2016 9:56:52 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		Cities also trend blue, even in red states.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 70
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trump to hit cities funding for sanctuary Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125