Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/8/2016 8:50:41 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

You are just making shit up.

bout the only thing he is good at.

Just barely, Lucy. I wouldn't give him a passing grade.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/8/2016 8:59:17 PM   
Curmudgeonly1


Posts: 466
Joined: 10/6/2011
Status: offline
The paid agitators have raised millions of dollars one way and another to pay themselves.

A simple google search - dakota pipeline protester funding - showed 888,000 hits.

The agents provocateur are mercenaries.

Full stop. Period. The end.

No ifs, ands, buts or maybes.

I accept your apology.



_____________________________

"The more defects a man may have, the older he is, the less lovable, the more resounding his success." Donatien Alphonse François

Dummheit straft sich selbst.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/8/2016 9:02:05 PM   
Curmudgeonly1


Posts: 466
Joined: 10/6/2011
Status: offline
Thanks for playing, anyway.



_____________________________

"The more defects a man may have, the older he is, the less lovable, the more resounding his success." Donatien Alphonse François

Dummheit straft sich selbst.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/8/2016 9:44:40 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curmudgeonly1

The paid agitators have raised millions of dollars one way and another to pay themselves.

A simple google search - dakota pipeline protester funding - showed 888,000 hits.

The agents provocateur are mercenaries.

Full stop. Period. The end.

No ifs, ands, buts or maybes.

I accept your apology.



The fund is among several cash streams that have provided at least $3 million US to help with legal costs, food and other supplies to those opposing the nearly 1,900 kilometre pipeline. It may also give protesters the ability to prolong their months-long encampments that have attracted thousands of supporters, as the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pursues the fight in court.
LINK

Get back to me when you have a link to support your fantasy that paid provocateurs are afoot in the area.

Until such time, Sir Cur, you are awarded the status of Royal Idiot & Liar.

Carry on or sod off.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Curmudgeonly1)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/8/2016 10:09:06 PM   
Curmudgeonly1


Posts: 466
Joined: 10/6/2011
Status: offline
You're the looker in your family, aren't you?



_____________________________

"The more defects a man may have, the older he is, the less lovable, the more resounding his success." Donatien Alphonse François

Dummheit straft sich selbst.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/9/2016 8:31:07 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Why the fuss? Aren't you a Citizens United supporter? It's all free speech, according to the Supremely Conservative Court.

Hell, send them billions! Aren't the militarized police well funded too?

Too bad they didn't bring guns -- then conservatives would love them!

If they called themselves a militia, conservatives might even join. As long as they had cool camo and training missions.

The Trumptoons have spoken. It's the age of the billionaires.

Money is the rule of law.

So what's the problem? Dollar democracy at work.




< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 12/9/2016 8:32:25 AM >

(in reply to Curmudgeonly1)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 10:47:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Another 'inch thick pipe' bursts. And nobody was looking.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/12/oil-spill-pipeline-north-dakota-standing-rock-belle-fourche

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 11:36:02 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
since you are incapable of actually articulating a point, im reluctant to make one for you but also since your unstated point is ineffectual, I wont mind too much.

accidents happen. there was supposed to be safeguards in place to detect the accident, and they failed.

here's the response to that---they will figure out how/why those safeguards failed, changes will occur and safety will improve.

meanwhile, maybe we should shut down all the pipelines in the country and you can start walking back and forth to work everyday?

oh and these, all from within the past handful of days (though a couple hearken back to recent history):

Kenya oil tanker crashes, explodes leaving at least 30 dead

Overturned tanker spills 500 gallons of oil on I-75

Slick Roads Blamed for Tanker Crash in Lackawanna County

Tanker, Trailer Crashes Across Nigeria Claim 1,048 Lives

Costs of Gorge oil train derailment adding up - KTVZ

Death toll in Bulgaria tanker train explosion rises to 8

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 11:44:37 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Since you like to felchgobble, I didnt think you would come up with anything cogent, and you didnt.

RULE 1: But simple shit, do not run pipes over or under water.

Other than that retard, you are walking everyday, since someone as fucking retarded as you are denied a drivers license.

Why would you shut down every pipeline in the country? No need to shit your pants, dogshit44. There is an easy remedy...SEE RULE 1.

go pound your pud and gobble your felch with your circlefelch, I have no desire to hang out with you and your boyfriends.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 12:39:39 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Pipeline accidents in 30 years

Oil industry supporters argue that pipelines are safer alternative to hauling fuel by tanker trucks or freight trains. “Environmental analysis comparing pipelines to rail finds pipelines will result in fewer incidents, barrels released, personal injuries, and greenhouse gas emissions,” says John Stoody, a spokesperson for the Association of Oil Pipe Lines, in a statement to CityLab. He cites an environmental impact statement conducted by the U.S. State Department comparing the impact of rail delivery of crude oil to that of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline. Additionally, a 2013 study from the conservative Manhattan Institute found that road transportation had an annual accident rate of 19.95 incidents per billion ton miles and rail transportation had 2.08 incidents per billion ton miles, compared to 0.89 incidents per billion ton miles for natural gas transmission and 0.58 serious incidents per billion ton miles for hazardous liquid pipelines.

Environmentalists, however, point to a lack of adequate state and federal regulation and the difficulties of maintaining millions of miles of aging pipeline infrastructure in their warnings about the dangers of spills, fires, and other accidents. And data from the federal government suggests such concerns should be taken seriously. Over the last thirty years, just under 9,000 significant pipeline-related incidents have taken place nationwide, according to data from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. (Not counted in this total are thousands of less “significant" pipeline-related malfunctions.)



To better understand the extent of this damage, CityLab mapped out all significant pipeline accidents between 1986 and 2016, based on data compiled by Richard Stover, an environmental advocate and former research astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz. According to Stover, these accidents have resulted in 548 deaths, 2,576 injuries, and over $8.5 billion in financial damages.

In the map above, you can see the locations of all significant oil and gas pipeline incidents since 1986 in which the federal government provided location data. (Note: In incident cases without longitude and latitude information in the federal data, Stover geolocated incidents based on their county data. Also, he didn’t include data from Alaska or Hawaii.) The incidents are sized bigger and shaded darker as the financial damage associated with each incident increases. Zoom in on the map to get a more fine-grained view of the incident clustering and click on individuals dots to see specifics about related fatalities, injuries, and financial costs.

Stover points out the locations reflect the footprint of oil and gas pipeline distribution networks nationwide, suggesting that wherever pipelines are extended, deadly accidents will follow. Incidents are particularly common, for example, in Texas and Louisiana, where numerous lines carry oil and gas, extracted on- and off-shore, to serve the rest of the country.
http://www.citylab.com/weather/2016/11/30-years-of-pipeline-accidents-mapped/509066/

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 12:43:25 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Depends how you define "worse"

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/04/26/pick-your-poison-for-crude-pipeline-rail-truck-or-boat/#57fb925f5777

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 1:09:25 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
it looks like Rick Perry is being looked at for dept of energy??
man you guys are fucked.
He couldnt remember the name of it, but he knows he wants to destroy it and the regulations.
He also serves on the board of directors of Energy Transfer Partners, the company involved with the Dakota pipeline.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 12/13/2016 4:43:57 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
Thank you, Johnny. I knew none of this. It is helpful and might even sway me.

Just trying to help. :)


quote:


One addendum to this: if it's "shortest distance between two points" and the land belongs to the Souix, that is NOT (in my mind) a good enough reason to continue with it. Re-route it, I would say.

Personally, I would think the Souix being upset over a pipeline anywhere near their land could have been easily predictable by the planners. Seems like they could have considered that in the first place and we could have avoided this whole thing with an entirely different route to start. JMO

The route, or portions of it was changed about 40 times during the review process. (I'm trying to remember but this is an estimate) about 50 Native tribes showed up during the process and made contributions to the routing discussion. The Standing Rock tribe refused to attend, even when they were specifically asked to attend a couple of dozen times. The tribe did not contribute and then sued. It lost the suit. So it made a political spectacle instead. Which seems to have worked for now.

The pipeline route, in the location being protested is adjacent to, and only a few feet away, from an existing pipeline and it is under a power line tower route. Specifically, it is a well used infrastructure route that already exists.

As an aside, in pipeline cases such as this there are a lot of permissions needed before construction can begin. There is a standard method for those permissions to be gotten. Usually, and this case isn't usual, the process takes about three years. I'd have to look up how long this took. For instance, in a case like this, where a pipeline goes under a river, even the Coast Gaurd has to give permission since the river is considered a navigable water way. Generally, for instance, the Coast Gaurd will want the pipeline deep underground rather than hanging on a bridge since it has less chance of being run into and damaged by a ship. And, that, my friends is just thirty seconds of a three year process involved in the decision making. It's assumed that all interested parties come to the table and discuss their interests. The Standing Rock tribe did not, despite repeated requests and invitations. I'm not saying if I'm for it or agin it, just providing information.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 2/2/2017 12:00:16 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11339
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online

FR

How are those snake tears for our big wet muddy rock coming along

quote:

Cleanup begins at Dakota Access pipeline protest encampment

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Cleanup of a North Dakota encampment where opponents of the Dakota Access oil pipeline stayed for months to protest the $3.8 billion project is expected to take weeks, a leader of the tribe that organized the protest said Tuesday.

The Standing Rock Sioux hopes to complete the work before any spring floodwaters from the Cannonball River can wash debris into the Missouri River — the very waterway pipeline opponents are working to protect. The camp has seen an exodus in recent weeks due to winter weather, pipeline work being stalled and the tribe's recent call for people to leave.

Protesters have left behind not just trash, but tents and even cars.

"There's more than anticipated, and it's under a lot of snow," Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault said. "I wouldn't say it's going to get done in days; it's going to take weeks."

More


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 2/2/2017 12:04:21 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
How are those snake tears for our big wet muddy rock coming along

How are yours? All you seem to do in here is feign upset at the stuff the nasty liberals are doing. You should be all cried out like a whiney country song by now.

< Message edited by WhoreMods -- 2/2/2017 12:09:40 PM >


_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 2/2/2017 12:09:01 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
Thank you, Johnny. I knew none of this. It is helpful and might even sway me.

Just trying to help. :)


quote:


One addendum to this: if it's "shortest distance between two points" and the land belongs to the Souix, that is NOT (in my mind) a good enough reason to continue with it. Re-route it, I would say.

Personally, I would think the Souix being upset over a pipeline anywhere near their land could have been easily predictable by the planners. Seems like they could have considered that in the first place and we could have avoided this whole thing with an entirely different route to start. JMO

The route, or portions of it was changed about 40 times during the review process. (I'm trying to remember but this is an estimate) about 50 Native tribes showed up during the process and made contributions to the routing discussion. The Standing Rock tribe refused to attend, even when they were specifically asked to attend a couple of dozen times. The tribe did not contribute and then sued. It lost the suit. So it made a political spectacle instead. Which seems to have worked for now.

The pipeline route, in the location being protested is adjacent to, and only a few feet away, from an existing pipeline and it is under a power line tower route. Specifically, it is a well used infrastructure route that already exists.

As an aside, in pipeline cases such as this there are a lot of permissions needed before construction can begin. There is a standard method for those permissions to be gotten. Usually, and this case isn't usual, the process takes about three years. I'd have to look up how long this took. For instance, in a case like this, where a pipeline goes under a river, even the Coast Gaurd has to give permission since the river is considered a navigable water way. Generally, for instance, the Coast Gaurd will want the pipeline deep underground rather than hanging on a bridge since it has less chance of being run into and damaged by a ship. And, that, my friends is just thirty seconds of a three year process involved in the decision making. It's assumed that all interested parties come to the table and discuss their interests. The Standing Rock tribe did not, despite repeated requests and invitations. I'm not saying if I'm for it or agin it, just providing information.

your cant is based on nutsucker slobbergbogging, The tribe was sent a letter and they forcefully responded. http://rabbitsliketrumpets.typepad.com/gov.uscourts.dcd.180660.6.0.pdf

Having made their treaty position clear https://www.sayanythingblog.com/entry/doesnt-matter-standing-rock-voiced-opposition-dapl-one-time-2014/

The government of the united states told the government of the Lakota, pretty much too fuckin bad, so why would they participate, when great white father says he is here to help.........

They tried and got the forked tongue, not the first time. So, what would you do but dig in wilbur?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 2/2/2017 1:14:57 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
Well we all know that the only good indian is a pipeline-loving indian.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. - 2/2/2017 4:45:07 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curmudgeonly1

The paid agitators have raised millions of dollars one way and another to pay themselves.

A simple google search - dakota pipeline protester funding - showed 888,000 hits.

The agents provocateur are mercenaries.

Full stop. Period. The end.

No ifs, ands, buts or maybes.

I accept your apology.





There are no paid agitators, they did not raise millions of dollars.

Full Stop. no ifs, ands buts or maybes.

It dont matter what horseshit you read on goggle, I have people here on both sides of that fight, relatives, and people I have known my whole life, and other long term acquaintances. I own interest in an oil well out there,

If there are any paid agitators they come from the pipelne company only, and they are not efficient at their job.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Curmudgeonly1)
Profile   Post #: 78
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: DAPL will not go thru, for now. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125