Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
its easy to get confused since I was actually responding to your post and not everyone knows yet that mnottertail's alias is mnalevolent.
but back on topic:
raise taxes!!
here I can even make that better: make the rich pay their "fair share!"
Make the rich pay ? What, all 100 of them ? The fact is there are not enough of them to do any real good. The debt is in the tens of trillions so unless you get the Rothschilds to move here and make tax laws that they have to pay bigtime you ain't getting anywhere.
The only thing you can do is tax companies and if they move out tax their products to the point where they lose money doing it. Government taskes the money and caves. They have no fucking balls. I would tell them "You are paying for access to this market". What's more if you even have one office here you are paying US taxes on all you make all over the world, just like real people have to. You did go to court to be considered persons right ? Well now you fucking are.
Rich people, well they would be paying more but that in no way would help the debt situation because there are too few of them. But if alot of things are deductible they will spend and that will stimulate the economy.
The problem is that they own the politicians.
Remember the story about the monkeys ? They put them in a cage and there was a banana at the top of a ladder, but it gave them an electrical shock. They changed out some of the monkeys and the old monkeys told the new monkeys not to climb the ladder, even though the electrical shock had not been administered for some time. The new monkey obeyed the old monkeys and then the old monkeys were removed and the new old monkeys told the new arrivals not to climb the ladder and try to get that banana.
The only way to solve this is to change ALL the monkeys at the same time but the way the Constitution has it set up that is impossible without serious strife.
Even James Tafficant, who was absolutely without a doubt framed came out and said there are certain people you do not piss off. I mean on a video. He has been told to stay away from government or else. Who told him that ?
They would have loved to have gotten Ron Paul and even Dennis Kucinich but those two did practically nothing while in office. Tafficant had a farm where he let kids work as farm boys and they were coached into thinking they were getting abused or some bullshit. And they still couldn't convict him on that, they got someone into his organisation who was cashing checks from a lawyer and found some sort of conflict of interest, and you cannot find exactly what that was. They had him under complete surveilence for years and had absolutely nothing to use in court, and yes they could have because they had a warrant. But because someone signed checks in his name, they were able to put him away. I was here people, I remember. He almost ran from prison and people around here think he could have won. Of course everyone capitulated, realizing how impractical that would be.
One thing Trump said alot of people liked was about lobbyists. They got to go. I don't know what he has in mind but it better be good or the monkeys will eat him alive. He better pick his own secret service agents if he plans to stop the lobbyists. On the other hand he seems to be hiring some of the people who pay those lobbyists.
And maybe he doesn't know it but if they privatize social security they are going to have a mess ten times bigger than the federal reserve (a private corporation) has created. Chartered by the government for an essential function, IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY. We are paying YOU to do this job. Congress was empowered by the Constitution to issue money and regulate the value thereof, not to abrogate their responsibility and hand it over to a corporation that is largely owned by foreign interests. And that is where half of our problems came from. It is a for profit corporation. And it has never had a real proper audit, I mean when federal agents order all the employees into the corner and start examining every record. All the audits have been internal. At least physically. But when "law enforcement" gets every scrap of evidence fro the accused, don't you think there is a bit of possibility of not getting the whole truth ? If they audited me and I said I bought a building and am losing money on it they want to know just where that building is. They will contact the seller and go in there and examine their record without mentioning my name, because they get fined if they do. Then they want receipts and they will go and talk to the people who wrote them, and still not mention my name, just go through ALL their records. they are not allowed to reveal who the target of an IRS investigation is, it is $100,000 per offense and one guy one $1.2 million from them for 12 offenses. they thank their god whoever that might be that most people do not know that. It is in the IRS code, a matter of public record. however their handbook is not a matter of public record. How convenient.
People talk about cuts in the FICA rates people pay and blame republicans, but Obama signed them. Now SS will be in trouble and benefits will have to be cut or the whole thing goes down, or debt goes up. I say that the republicans should not cut benefits, they should undo those cuts in the FICA tax. But they are so afraid to have people have a little bit more deductions from their paychecks they will probably pussy out. And as a result, by the time I get it (nine years to go) it will be nothing you can live on.
They are just like democrats, say whatever to get elected and then do whatever to stay elected. I never denied that. What I said was that Clinton was bad news and I am glad she is not getting the chair. (well the electric chair would be alright)
Let the country descend into anarchy, fukit. We have no choice anyway, we cannot sustain this. Maybe he will bring on the civil unrest that will finally fix things. He knows every hillbilly and their niggas have guns. He knows people are pissed off, and knows that is why he got the chair. Now he is going to sign to cut benefits to old people ? If it were me I would undo the cuts, which I agree I didn't even know had happened.
No matter if I retire or get disabled I know my benefits were cut because for ten year at least I had a part time under the table job that paid more than most people make, let alone take home. I am not bitching about that, but I am glad I didn't pay for gulf war two, or a bunch of other things. You did. And I didn't vote.
You say I got no right to bitch for not voting ? Bullshit, YOU voted for these people. There was nobody to vote for. YOU voted for them and look what happened. My abstentions were a statement - NONE OF THE ABOVE.
Damn I wish they would put that on the ballot. And really just have no President, or senator or whatever. I only marginally supported Obama because we had Mr 100 years in Iraq and Mr fuck 47 % of the people. With no President, only bills that have vetoproof support would pass. And people i states who REALLY cannot find a congressman or senator to run, then so much for that.
So it really looks like they are going to cut SS benefits, but they really are going to have to raise the rates. I hope this congress doesn't cling to that "revenue neutral" bullshit. You want revenue neutral, get neutral back to like 20 years ago when people paid 15.2 %. Raise the cap a bit and have a means test. for example, you think Donald Trump should be collecting social security ? He is eligible you know. but he said he was going to even refuse the President's salary, but I guess he has to take a dollar a year. He should maybe donate it all to some charity. To the federal government that is a drop in the bucket, but to a local homeless shelter, or like a half dozen of them it would be a godsend. He should rethink that, don't not take it, just donate it all out.
Maybe he will, maybe he won't. It is hard to find someone who can really put things in perspective, and the richer they come the harder it is to find one who can. It could be fifty grand a year to eight of them.
In fact I just heard (really just heard) that at the towers there has been a homeless Woman staying for quite some time and he hasn't thrown her out. someone called and the cops told her to be ready to get out the next day and Trump said pretty much "Fukit, let her stay". I really find it hard to believe unless she is good in bed or something, but who knows. there are guys as old as Trump who still prowl, so to speak. I might check on the truth of this but not right now. Though I don't really fault him if she is one of his concubines or something, and it is wrong technically, it is not as bad as Clinton.
Don't make me out to be calling Trump a philanthropist, she is probably polishing his knob real good. Or something. But until January 20th we got nothing to say about it. If he has her coming to the whitehose to do that when he is supposed to be working, then there is a problem. That is the problem with Bill Clinton, why wasn't he working ? I can think of a few jobs I had that if I was getting a blowjob on company time I would have at least got docked, and at a couple I would have gotten fired. What about any job, you stick your dick into the pickle slicer and she usually gets fired too. And what's more, his olday put up with it. And you want her for President when she can be bought off of marriage vows that were no doubt "spoken in front of god" ?
That's why she lost. Part of it anyway. you say Trump says anything, well so does she but she just makes up better lies.
T^T
|
RE: GOP introduces plan to massively cut Social Security - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread