Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: To Provide For The General Welfare


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: To Provide For The General Welfare Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/23/2016 7:23:24 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
Oh yeah, I forgot to ask:

Ever since policies and a multitude of legislation to enforce them have come into place directing the efforts of society towards providing greatest benefit to the wealth stealers and wealth destroyers to inevitable result of increasing the number of poor people, this mantra of "the poor want to be poor" has been invented and heavily promoted.

So, people working their asses off 40-45 hours a week in complete shit jobs to make $16k-22k a year do this because they want to work their asses off in complete shit jobs and still have to worry about paying the rent and the power bill, do I have this right?



< Message edited by Edwird -- 12/23/2016 7:32:34 PM >

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/23/2016 7:41:16 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Democrats had to have their token female. Well that BACKFIRED ON THEM and now we got Trump.

T^T


Who could have beaten Trump?

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/23/2016 7:56:16 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Democrats had to have their token female. Well that BACKFIRED ON THEM and now we got Trump.

T^T


Who could have beaten Trump?



I probably could've beaten Trump, but I would never associate myself with the DNC.

T^T

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/23/2016 7:59:21 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
If the media (including the so-called 'left media,' what a larf) hadn't gone out of their way in presenting Sanders as the 'cute old dodger, isn't that precious!' in aggressively dismissive fashion, there's a decent chance he could have won.

A lot less registered voters would have stayed home if he'd been the prime alternate to Trump, that's for sure.



< Message edited by Edwird -- 12/23/2016 8:00:41 PM >

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/23/2016 8:28:07 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
In any case, there was nothing 'token' about H. Clinton. Regardless of policies and pronounced inclination to support the status quo, she was more than well qualified for the job.

I doubt even Trump voters took her basic qualifications into consideration. In fact it's obvious that anyone voting for Trump had pretty much zero consideration of qualifications at all.

The multitudes didn't stay away in droves as consideration of her qualifications.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/23/2016 9:24:57 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline 		It's not her qualifications, it is her loyalty.

T^T

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/24/2016 12:34:54 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
No disagreement there, the question of her loyalty to what is what kept people away. I never got anything about loyalty to gender in any of her speeches or pronouncements, maybe I missed it. Whether expressly stated or not, her loyalty to the status quo was unmistakable however.

But in any case I don't think it was about gender for any more than a few voters on either side of it.



< Message edited by Edwird -- 12/24/2016 12:41:48 AM >

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/24/2016 12:43:22 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Who could have beaten Trump?



Off the top of my head?

1) Biden
2) O'Malley
3) Webb (for whom I might have been persuaded to vote).



Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: To Provide For The General Welfare - 12/26/2016 4:03:44 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


If the media (including the so-called 'left media,' what a larf) hadn't gone out of their way in presenting Sanders as the 'cute old dodger, isn't that precious!' in aggressively dismissive fashion, there's a decent chance he could have won.

A lot less registered voters would have stayed home if he'd been the prime alternate to Trump, that's for sure.



Yeah, who knows who would have won, but more people would have voted.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 49
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: To Provide For The General Welfare Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078