Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump

Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MrRodgers -> Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 11:29:51 AM)
Texan R-elector has announced he will not vote for Trump. As for any discipline, he will let the chips fall where they may. Chris Suprun will not vote for Trump on Monday and was on C-Span today. HERE On a side note, he joined democrats who asked for material from the CIA on any Russian involvement in the election and they have been refused.

Musicmystery -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 11:32:54 AM)
It will take a lot more. Probably wishful thinking. But I guess we'll see.

heavyblinker -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 11:45:03 AM)
There are 20 others who are considering it, according to a Harvard law professor. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-electors-lessig-232598 But seriously... can you even imagine what would happen if the EC denied Trump the presidency?

Wayward5oul -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:05:23 PM)
I can't really imagine that happening. I mean, I know that this past two years has shown that anything can happen, but at some point there has got to be a limit to where the impossible actually starts.

WhoreMods -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:09:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker There are 20 others who are considering it, according to a Harvard law professor. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-electors-lessig-232598 But seriously... can you even imagine what would happen if the EC denied Trump the presidency? I'm thinking a tantrum. They might have to shut down twitter completely for a week or two... [:D]

BamaD -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:10:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Texan R-elector has announced he will not vote for Trump. As for any discipline, he will let the chips fall where they may. Chris Suprun will not vote for Trump on Monday and was on C-Span today. HERE On a side note, he joined democrats who asked for material from the CIA on any Russian involvement in the election and they have been refused. This story is only about 6 months old.. About the time it came out 2 Dem electors announced that if Hillary won they wouldn't vote for her.

Wayward5oul -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:11:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker There are 20 others who are considering it, according to a Harvard law professor. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-electors-lessig-232598 But seriously... can you even imagine what would happen if the EC denied Trump the presidency? I'm thinking a tantrum. They might have to shut down twitter completely for a week or two... [:D] a week or two in dog time maybe

BamaD -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:16:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker There are 20 others who are considering it, according to a Harvard law professor. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-electors-lessig-232598 But seriously... can you even imagine what would happen if the EC denied Trump the presidency? I am afraid that the 1st thing that would happen would be that his violent supporters would take their cue the open minded Hillary supporters and riot for a couple of weeks. The long term effect would be that selection by Congress would become commonplace.

DaddySatyr -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:23:56 PM)
I have to say: I have seen Mr. Suprun interviewed three times, now. I believe he believes that what he's doing is the right thing. That's where it ends. 1) I know most of the left doesn't care, but the rule of law has to be maintained; no matter what the PPL masters would have the rank-and-file believe. 2) His announcement that he considers himself to be a "moral" elector infers that anyone else that doesn't follow his lead is less than moral. That's the exact fucking smugness that I hope the Dumbocratic party will run with for the next 20 years. Michael

BoscoX -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:26:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker There are 20 others who are considering it, according to a Harvard law professor. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-electors-lessig-232598 But seriously... can you even imagine what would happen if the EC denied Trump the presidency? I am afraid that the 1st thing that would happen would be that his violent supporters would take their cue the open minded Hillary supporters and riot for a couple of weeks. The long term effect would be that selection by Congress would become commonplace. Just like Harry Reid changing the Senate rules to a simple majority for most things? Something that will come along some day and tear out a big chunk of their ass out and smash it against the floor. Who doesnt think that the right couldnt have gotten a single elector to go against Hillary if roles were reversed. Morons, all of them. This is just more fake news to keep all of the Hillary snowflakes in full meltdown mode

Lucylastic -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:33:35 PM)
if its fake, you can prove it cant you... lets see your proof

BoscoX -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 12:51:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic if its fake, you can prove it cant you... lets see your proof Fake in the sense that it is newsworthy or substantive. "Hey look everyone - Mount Everest" [image]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/29/Mol_3.jpg/165px-Mol_3.jpg[/image] As someone else already pointed out above, two Dem electors were on record stating they would switch if Hillary won

WhoreMods -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 1:12:38 PM)
[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ee/60/84/ee60843e746185e052e1ba420b8c949b.jpg[/img]

heavyblinker -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 1:16:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Fake in the sense that it is newsworthy or substantive. That's not what fake means. Also, alt-left.

Musicmystery -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 1:29:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker There are 20 others who are considering it, according to a Harvard law professor. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/donald-trump-electors-lessig-232598 But seriously... can you even imagine what would happen if the EC denied Trump the presidency? They need at least 38.

Lucylastic -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 1:55:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic if its fake, you can prove it cant you... lets see your proof Fake in the sense that it is newsworthy or substantive. "Hey look everyone - Mount Everest" [image]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/29/Mol_3.jpg/165px-Mol_3.jpg[/image] As someone else already pointed out above, two Dem electors were on record stating they would switch if Hillary won but the subject isnt what would happen if hillary won the subject is trump EC electors. PS fake doesnt mean newsworthy. Substantive means it has a firm base in reality, so thats not "fake" either. but we know you love the dross just from your "google fu" You still need that pop up dictionary dont you.

Lucylastic -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 2:40:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods [img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ee/60/84/ee60843e746185e052e1ba420b8c949b.jpg[/img] I like this one personally [image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/colllar/bosoxtrumpshit.jpg[/image]

MrRodgers -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 7:45:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Texan R-elector has announced he will not vote for Trump. As for any discipline, he will let the chips fall where they may. Chris Suprun will not vote for Trump on Monday and was on C-Span today. HERE On a side note, he joined democrats who asked for material from the CIA on any Russian involvement in the election and they have been refused. This story is only about 6 months old.. About the time it came out 2 Dem electors announced that if Hillary won they wouldn't vote for her. He wasn't an elector until August, 4 months ago and [it] wasn't 'news' until just recently. Show us the link to the dems claims.

MrRodgers -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 7:49:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr I have to say: I have seen Mr. Suprun interviewed three times, now. I believe he believes that what he's doing is the right thing. That's where it ends. 1) I know most of the left doesn't care, but the rule of law has to be maintained; no matter what the PPL masters would have the rank-and-file believe. 2) His announcement that he considers himself to be a "moral" elector infers that anyone else that doesn't follow his lead is less than moral. That's the exact fucking smugness that I hope the Dumbocratic party will run with for the next 20 years. Michael In Texas, elector's votes are not bound by law. They are free to vote for anyone. Mr. Suprun actually thought (privately) about writing in John Kacish before the election.

BamaD -> RE: Texas Repub elector will not vote for Trump (12/17/2016 8:54:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Texan R-elector has announced he will not vote for Trump. As for any discipline, he will let the chips fall where they may. Chris Suprun will not vote for Trump on Monday and was on C-Span today. HERE On a side note, he joined democrats who asked for material from the CIA on any Russian involvement in the election and they have been refused. This story is only about 6 months old.. About the time it came out 2 Dem electors announced that if Hillary won they wouldn't vote for her. He wasn't an elector until August, 4 months ago and [it] wasn't 'news' until just recently. Show us the link to the dems claims. It was mentioned about two times in the news sites, no way to "prove" it too you. Ok four months old, he stated this well before the election.

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125