PeonForHer -> RE: 'Allahu Akbar' - Terrorist Attack In Germanistan (12/27/2016 6:57:19 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I'd continue discussing this matter with you, Bosco, but it's become too insane for me to bear, unfortunately. In other words, you're doing what you always do. Abandoning the argument when your inability to argue gets you in trouble. Try to understand, A. Arguing with people such as Bosco - and of course yourself - becomes like engaging in a wrestling match in a room full of horse manure. It's unpleasant. It doesn't matter if you win or if you lose - you always come out stinking of faecal matter. No, you're just copping out. Your intellectual horsepower is as weak as your manhood. Trying to dress up your inability to argue is just pathetic, Peon. This is not the first time you've done this, you ALWAYS drop out when you get your ass handed to you. Your axioms are suspect, your inferences are ludicrous and your vague attempts at argument are riddled with fallacies. Honestly, your claims to competence are laughable. It's a clear demonstration that you're surrounded by poor thinkers who aren't any more competent than you are. I'm pegging you below 110. You're clearly not up to the task of defending a proposition. Nope. Please try to grasp it, A. I don't have a wife who I have an eternal need to impress with my super-Alpha-ness. I don't need to impress people who I don't know and who don't matter with my brains because I've already done that with some of the best brains in Britain and have the paperwork to prove it. A, please stop trying to beat me in this game. You've often accused me of arrogance in the past - well, you should believe it, but a hundred times more strongly than you currently do. When people like you and Bosco argue with me, it's often like someone shouting 'Wanker!' at me from the roadside as I drive by. There's nothing in it for me to stop and present that person with a reasoned, factually-supported argument as to why I'm not, actually, a wanker. Do you finally see? Please try. Why would I want to wrestle in a pigsty in order to prove that I'm a better pig than the one who's challenged me to a fight in it? What is *actually in it for me*? Obviously - I hope - I have no need to out-pig a pig. Jesus, A. This shouldn't be that difficult for you. Look, you can't win against me. But it doesn't matter because you don't need to win against me!
|
|
|
|