WickedsDesire
Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
|
Plans to demand proof of identity before voting in a bid to combat electoral fraud have been defended by ministers, amid criticism the move is a "sledgehammer to crack a nut".
Councils in England, including Bradford and Birmingham, will trial the pilot scheme at local elections in 2018.
The government said it would "ensure the integrity" of the electoral system.
Campaigners said levels of fraud did not justify the move while Labour said it amounted to voter "suppression".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38440934
Its beginning to sound a lot like America Doolally Land
So refresh my memory UK do we use the paws(hand) count, or the machine count.
Slippernotes
1. By autracry ( wicked aint spelling that correctly any time soon) Autocracy I mean a cabal
2. America Eligible to vote 240 million. Registered to vote 200 million = 83% (far too low)
3. UK Eligible to vote ???? million. Registered to vote 45 million = ??% (far too low/awesome)
I think the biggest electoral fraud is what these candidates stand for whilst delivering, oft, not one iota shag all and should be held accountable...they should you know. I also believe all votes should be postal which would get most of the popllaution...as us in the uk always get those daft electoral- change of circumstances brown envelopes 2-4 times a year - they bug my tits too...why promise a fine if voting is not mandatory - spoil the ballots is an individual choice
< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 12/28/2016 6:14:35 AM >
|
Electoral fraud: Pilot scheme for ID before voting defe... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread