MasterJaguar01
Posts: 2352
Joined: 12/2/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka Well it is if you know much about Israel. This statement makes no sense. Nor does the pronoun reference. Kerry's speech is anti- Israel if you know much about Israel. Well, I know more about Israel than most here. I know that the current administration's policy of grabbing more and more land in the West Bank and East Jerusalem kills the possibility of peace, prosperity, and security for anyone. I know if Tzipi Livni had prevailed in the last election: 1) We'd be well on our way to a 2-state solution. 2) Hamas would be humiliated and defeated (both politically and militarily) 3) Iran would lose legitimacy in the Middle East, as would Hezbollah, and every other terrorist assclown group in the region, (e.g. ISIS!) 4) There would be new joint Israeli-Palestinian businesses, creating more jobs for the region 5) The U.S. standing in the Middle East would fully recover from the lows of the Bush Administration 6) We would hedge out Russia in the Middle East (at least until 1/20/17, when the next President and his Secretary Of State cede all American leadership to Putin.) The Israeli people know FAR more about Israel than I do, and they are very PRO-Israel. Ehud Barak knows far more about Israel than I do, and he says that the majority of Israelis (who are DEFINITELY Pro-Israel) agree with the speech.
|