RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:08:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

OK. But the problem then is the one outlined above.

If we set our assumptions as the parameters, we only find what we think we know.

You have a point but as heavyblinker pointed out opening the discussion wider makes it unwieldy and frankly from my experience gives license to some to play dodgy and obtuse while levying insults on others. I can do without that pompous, snarky, childish, boring shit.




heavyblinker -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:10:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
I can do without that pompous, snarky, childish, boring shit.


You've come to the wrong forum.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:10:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Your problem is that the basic 'problem' put forth:

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God...

Is that there is no need to reconcile since God in the Bible never claims to be 'Omnibenevolent'. In fact, He clearly states that He is not.



Depends on which Testament, doesn't it?




heavyblinker -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:13:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

OK. But the problem then is the one outlined above.

If we set our assumptions as the parameters, we only find what we think we know.


To be honest, it probably would be better if we got things back on track.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:14:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.


Right. God's will be done. [8|]

People are killed everyday by nature. God, we are told in the West, created Nature. Ergo . . . .



so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation.

If you have a child who grows into an adult and rapes someone that is also your fault cuz you made em is that right?

Square that up for us.

RO, you are way off my point here. I specifically excluded the evil that men do because the Christian theists dodge that with the doctrine of free will and punitive sin.




Musicmystery -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:15:02 AM)

The track isn't leading anywhere.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:25:07 AM)

I will stand back. Have at it.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:29:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.


Right. God's will be done. [8|]

People are killed everyday by nature. God, we are told in the West, created Nature. Ergo . . . .



Position 1) so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation.

Position 2) If you have a child who grows into an adult and rapes someone that is also your fault cuz you made em is that right?

Square that up for us.

RO, you are way off my point here. I specifically excluded the evil that men do because the Christian theists dodge that with the doctrine of free will and punitive sin.



OK great so you have eliminated Position 2) however you completely ignored Position 1) so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation. which directly applies.

[and just in case it doesnt]:

So its all the creators fault, the same could be said about a tree that falls on someone, or lightning striking someone and any number of things in nature, someone drowning for instance, the creators fault?

Seriously square that up for us, how that fits your God is a criminal because God is the creator position?








Kirata -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:40:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

I introduced the topic of theodicy in reply to a poster's misbegotten notions of the evolution of furry fish...

Yeah, and the scary thing is that you really do think they connect somehow.

Ohhhh . . . . I didn't intend to frighten you, child. Perhaps you will feel safe hiding under your bed for awhile.

I'd feel safer if you could present a cogent explanation for why you think the Theological problem of evil is germane to the issue of whether Science and Religion are incompatible. It seems to me an exceedingly peculiar notion on its face, and all the more so because the so-called "problem of evil" isn't even a problem for religion generally anyway. Perhaps you might be willing to enlighten us?

K.





Kirata -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:50:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Your problem is that the basic 'problem' put forth:

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God...

Is that there is no need to reconcile since God in the Bible never claims to be 'Omnibenevolent'. In fact, He clearly states that He is not.

Depends on which Testament, doesn't it?

You think so, do you? Which one would you prefer to cite? The one in which he commands a series of wholesale slaughters, or the one in which he condemns people he doesn't like to eternal torment in the fires of Hell?

K.





Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:51:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

The secret word is context.

But if all things includes all of space and all of time, then time is not linear and events were also made when God made all things. They don't actually happen, the 'happening' is our perception of them.

In your statement you didn't mention context at all... you were proclaiming that things and objects were the same, which is why you got the response you did (and I even asked about context).

Oh, and you're a stupid cunt.

I didn't "mention" the context? Ferfucksake, I quoted it. And you provided it: The Gospel of John. The context of John 1:3 is "in the beginning," and non-linear time doesn't have a beginning. But hey, keep swinging. The poor lonely brain cell obviously needs the exercise, and I think it's helping. You're becoming more creative.

K.




In several religious systems, including Hinduism, Taoism, and many primal religions, their isn't this "God did everything" assumption -- for the Greeks, the Universe created the gods. For many, the Universe just always was, vs. created.

So...if folks want the discussion limited to the Abraham religions, it's worth clarifying that at the outset. At the same time, that's just announcing "we're going to cling to assumptions," so the conversation is likely to be circular.



God 'does' everything is not the assumption of the educated minority of christian community as far as I know, it may be by some but I prefer to have a discussion along the lines of what highly educated people would discuss in christianity, not someone on the street that cant even spell it much less understand it.







Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 9:57:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

Given that John's prologue was written in Koine Greek, I'm not sure battling over the English meaning of "things" is all that productive. A more fruitful question might be what "all things" may have meant to those hearing the passage in the first or second centuries.

I've always taken the words to mean the whole of creation, including humankind, but then I've never delved into the question.

Bonus trivia: John 1 was considered such a core text that it was read at the end of each Roman Catholic mass prior to Vatican II.



good call, which can be said about virtually every historical argument I have ever seen on the net.

Then God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. So the evening and the morning were the second day.[3]


most people today wouldnt stand a snowballs chance in hell of sorting that out based upon the arguments I have seen on these boards.

Not that I am trying to drag K's thread off topic more than it already is, just sayin [8D]








WickedsDesire -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:00:36 AM)

I always thought there was more than one religion. Does anyone know how many gods there are – named ones…don’t look at me I don’t.

Surely religions are completely incompatible with each other I conclude as I stagger of to the fridge for a nice glass of cheap chardonnay




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:09:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.


Right. God's will be done. [8|]

People are killed everyday by nature. God, we are told in the West, created Nature. Ergo . . . .



Position 1) so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation.

Position 2) If you have a child who grows into an adult and rapes someone that is also your fault cuz you made em is that right?

Square that up for us.

RO, you are way off my point here. I specifically excluded the evil that men do because the Christian theists dodge that with the doctrine of free will and punitive sin.



OK great so you have eliminated Position 2) however you completely ignored Position 1) so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation. which directly applies.

[and just in case it doesnt]:

So its all the creators fault, the same could be said about a tree that falls on someone, or lightning striking someone and any number of things in nature, someone drowning for instance, the creators fault?

Seriously square that up for us, how that fits your God is a criminal because God is the creator position?


I eliminated both, since both involve human agency.

The drowning? Yeah, if it were a flash flood, say, the Deity did it. If a drunk fell overboard, human agency.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:16:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Last chance, 'QUOTE' where it says or implies God 'does' everything.


That page I linked to provided an abundance of quotes regarding God's omnipotence, but okay:

quote:

John 1:3

All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.


ALL THINGS-- as far as I can tell, that includes everything that has happened, everything that is happening, and everything that will happen.

http://biblehub.com/john/1-3.htm

I suppose you could argue this was an oversight, an unreliable source, clumsy wording or that 'all things' doesn't literally mean 'everything' and that God simply created the thing that would eventually become all things... but this notion doesn't seem so complicated to me that if whoever was communicating with God at the time had wanted to express that, they wouldn't have been able to.


However even Vince eliminated the things that humans do in an attempt to sepearate from will from the equation, you are claiming God 'does' everything and I asked you to quote it from your source because as I am sure you now realize that is not to be found in your source and I have never run across such a claim anywhere. Suffice to say, you cant quote it.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:19:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.


Right. God's will be done. [8|]

People are killed everyday by nature. God, we are told in the West, created Nature. Ergo . . . .



Position 1) so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation.

Position 2) If you have a child who grows into an adult and rapes someone that is also your fault cuz you made em is that right?

Square that up for us.

RO, you are way off my point here. I specifically excluded the evil that men do because the Christian theists dodge that with the doctrine of free will and punitive sin.



OK great so you have eliminated Position 2) however you completely ignored Position 1) so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation. which directly applies.

[and just in case it doesnt]:

So its all the creators fault, the same could be said about a tree that falls on someone, or lightning striking someone and any number of things in nature, someone drowning for instance, the creators fault?

Seriously square that up for us, how that fits your God is a criminal because God is the creator position?


I eliminated both, since both involve human agency.

The drowning? Yeah, if it were a flash flood, say, the Deity did it. If a drunk fell overboard, human agency.




huh? seriously? People are mobile, its human agency that they were in a place of a natural disaster in the first place. That said you need to explain how humans can be involved at all without some level of human agency? That and using 'drunk' as a qualifier to put blame on the human is frankly a lame strawman play, as if to imply the only people who drown are drunk and its their fault. That pig doesnt not fly.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:20:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

I introduced the topic of theodicy in reply to a poster's misbegotten notions of the evolution of furry fish...

Yeah, and the scary thing is that you really do think they connect somehow.

Ohhhh . . . . I didn't intend to frighten you, child. Perhaps you will feel safe hiding under your bed for awhile.

I'd feel safer if you could present a cogent explanation for why you think the Theological problem of evil is germane to the issue of whether Science and Religion are incompatible. It seems to me an exceedingly peculiar notion on its face, and all the more so because the so-called "problem of evil" isn't even a problem for religion generally anyway. Perhaps you might be willing to enlighten us?

K.



Well, I tried to stand back so you lot can get on with your discussion, but I will answer your insecurity. I posted a link to this. Perhaps you did not read it. Some Christian theists, specifically the "Young Earthers" try to deal with the theological problem by denying the science . . . a massive incompatibility related directly to the topic of this thread.




heavyblinker -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:29:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
most people today wouldnt stand a snowballs chance in hell of sorting that out based upon the arguments I have seen on these boards.


Is the reason you're so eager to tell yourself you're smarter than everyone because no one else will do it for you?




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:31:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

I always thought there was more than one religion. Does anyone know how many gods there are – named ones…don’t look at me I don’t.

Surely religions are completely incompatible with each other I conclude as I stagger of to the fridge for a nice glass of cheap chardonnay



There are 32 gods in Kafiristan, and you and me Peachy will be 33 and 34.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 10:31:08 AM)

quote:

huh? seriously? People are mobile, its human agency that they were in a place of a natural disaster in the first place. That said you need to explain how humans can be involved at all without some level of human agency?
People seem to be everywhere and natural disasters seem to occur everywhere and frequently with little warning. I don't know of any place on earth where nature does not vent its fury in some fashion or other, except maybe under Kirata's bed. [;)] The universe and the earth are basically hostile to human existence. It is quite amazing the species has survived this long. That we have is a testament to our sciences.




Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625