RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


dcnovice -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 7:56:18 PM)

No comment.




Kirata -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 8:14:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

My admittedly modest impression is that the Abrahamic faiths tend to portray God as good and merciful.

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things. ~Isaiah 45:7

K.




Kirata -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 8:16:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

No comment.

Though I doubt it needs saying, I didn't have you in mind. [:)]

K.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:05:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Suffering is a part of life, and we may wonder why, but the question I struggle with is why every thread that touches on a higher power or intelligence ends up infested with people who want to make the Christian God the topic so they can vent their spleen at him for not gifting us with a padded playpen.

K.




well what I see as the irony of ironies:



quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

In my post #157 I clearly named the Christian God as the subject of my remarks.
[snip]
Crimes have been committed. The Christian God is a serial killer and a mass murderer. That is the indictment. Unfortunately, assembling a jury of his peers is problematic. [:)]



claiming the Christian God is a criminal serial killer. my jaw hit the floor with laughter. I'd wait for an explanation but his usual mo is simply to disappear frojm the thread.

Maybe you have a comment this but I havent been able to stop laughing for a multitude of reasons. [8D]




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:10:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I must admit DC... I struggle with the same.

Butch

Me too. Believe me.


I presume this is the question 'why God permits evil'?

There is a very simple answer to that actually if you read between the lines in my post on the previous page. I can explain it if you like. :)




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:10:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Suffering is a part of life, and we may wonder why, but the question I struggle with is why every thread that touches on a higher power or intelligence ends up infested with people who want to make the Christian God the topic so they can vent their spleen at him for not gifting us with a padded playpen.

K.




well what I see as the irony of ironies:



quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

In my post #157 I clearly named the Christian God as the subject of my remarks.
[snip]
Crimes have been committed. The Christian God is a serial killer and a mass murderer. That is the indictment. Unfortunately, assembling a jury of his peers is problematic. [:)]



claiming the Christian God is a criminal serial killer. my jaw hit the floor with laughter. I'd wait for an explanation but his usual mo is simply to disappear frojm the thread.

Maybe you have a comment this but I havent been able to stop laughing for a multitude of reasons. [8D]

Nope, I am still here. I find this topic endlessly interesting.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:17:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
Assuming God is responsible for everything.

The Buddhists wouldn't agree.


That's why it's better to talk about one God at a time.
Otherwise you can just pick and choose whatever assumptions suit your argument best.


Well, the earlier argument was that a point was inherently true, not an assumption, and my point in entering the conversation was to illustrate that indeed, it was an assumption.


I'm pretty sure that vince was speaking hypothetically.
In a scenario where the Christian God is real, it is true that God is a mass murderer.

But I suppose different people have different ideas of what it means to be omnipotent, omniscient, etc... but you would need to define what you mean when you say 'God' before you could discuss it.

I did specify which God I was talking about. MM expanded the discussion, or he tried to. I made no reference to Buddhists or to the Hindu gods. MM introduced those straw men.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:25:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Suffering is a part of life, and we may wonder why, but the question I struggle with is why every thread that touches on a higher power or intelligence ends up infested with people who want to make the Christian God the topic so they can vent their spleen at him for not gifting us with a padded playpen.

K.




well what I see as the irony of ironies:



quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

In my post #157 I clearly named the Christian God as the subject of my remarks.
[snip]
Crimes have been committed. The Christian God is a serial killer and a mass murderer. That is the indictment. Unfortunately, assembling a jury of his peers is problematic. [:)]



claiming the Christian God is a criminal serial killer. my jaw hit the floor with laughter. I'd wait for an explanation but his usual mo is simply to disappear frojm the thread.

Maybe you have a comment this but I havent been able to stop laughing for a multitude of reasons. [8D]

Nope, I am still here. I find this topic endlessly interesting.



great then you wont mind proving that God is a murder and criminal.




tamaka -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:29:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Suffering is a part of life, and we may wonder why, but the question I struggle with is why every thread that touches on a higher power or intelligence ends up infested with people who want to make the Christian God the topic so they can vent their spleen at him for not gifting us with a padded playpen.

K.




well what I see as the irony of ironies:



quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

In my post #157 I clearly named the Christian God as the subject of my remarks.
[snip]
Crimes have been committed. The Christian God is a serial killer and a mass murderer. That is the indictment. Unfortunately, assembling a jury of his peers is problematic. [:)]



claiming the Christian God is a criminal serial killer. my jaw hit the floor with laughter. I'd wait for an explanation but his usual mo is simply to disappear frojm the thread.

Maybe you have a comment this but I havent been able to stop laughing for a multitude of reasons. [8D]

Nope, I am still here. I find this topic endlessly interesting.


Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:38:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Assuming God is responsible for everything.

The Buddhists wouldn't agree.

I suspect the problem of theodicy is much harder to wrestle with in the Abrahamic faiths, where God is often hailed as being responsible for everything. In a framework where folks sincerely say, "God saved my Mom from cancer" or "The doctors said I'd never get pregnant, but God sent me a baby," it's not surprising that folks would also ask "Why did God take our toddler?" or "Why is Dad dying by degrees as the ALS rages?"



you always get some one using a quote from a dilbrain off the street that cant even spell God, as a disingenuous representation of a religious position.

God does everything, people suffer and die therefore God is a criminal, Vince really went over the top on that one.

Why dont these people bring in theology or philosophy and take one step out of the mud for mankind


Vince did not invent the problem of theodicy. Your lack of awareness of the issue does not mean there is no history to it. From Wiki . .

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world.[2][12][14][note 1] The problem may be described either experientially or theoretically.[2] The experiential problem is the difficulty in believing in a concept of loving God when confronted by suffering or evil in the real world, such as from epidemics, or wars, or murder, or rape or terror attacks wherein innocent children, women, men or a loved one becomes a victim.[17][18][19] The problem of evil is also a theoretical one, usually described and studied by religion scholars in two varieties: the logical problem and the evidential problem.[2]

Human suffering takes place at the hands of Nature and at the hands of other humans. The latter raised the issue of free will and responsibility; I presented a very narrow Brief in order to avoid the issue of free will. Only an omnipotent and merciless Christian God could rain volcanic ash and lava down upon innocent infants. (Not to ignore Yahweh, who was a nasty and irascible old fellow.) I further limited my Brief to the experiential component, not the theoretical. MM and Kirata have tried to expand my comments. they are the parents of straw men in this thread.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:42:26 PM)

quote:

Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.


Right. God's will be done. [8|]

People are killed everyday by nature. God, we are told in the West, created Nature. Ergo . . . .




tamaka -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:43:16 PM)

Your problem is that the basic 'problem' put forth:

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God...

Is that there is no need to reconcile since God in the Bible never claims to be 'Omnibenevolent'. In fact, He clearly states that He is not.





vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:46:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Suffering is a part of life, and we may wonder why, but the question I struggle with is why every thread that touches on a higher power or intelligence ends up infested with people who want to make the Christian God the topic so they can vent their spleen at him for not gifting us with a padded playpen.

K.




well what I see as the irony of ironies:



quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

In my post #157 I clearly named the Christian God as the subject of my remarks.
[snip]
Crimes have been committed. The Christian God is a serial killer and a mass murderer. That is the indictment. Unfortunately, assembling a jury of his peers is problematic. [:)]



claiming the Christian God is a criminal serial killer. my jaw hit the floor with laughter. I'd wait for an explanation but his usual mo is simply to disappear frojm the thread.

Maybe you have a comment this but I havent been able to stop laughing for a multitude of reasons. [8D]

Nope, I am still here. I find this topic endlessly interesting.



great then you wont mind proving that God is a murder and criminal.

See my answer in #251. I am not the Judge and Jury. I am just a messenger with the indictment. I ain't the sheriff! [:D]




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:48:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
I dpont know abou tthat, you made him do a 180, now he has to prove the God exists that he is claiming does not exist to prove his criminal charges. Me, I wouldnt call that a waste of time but time to gt the popcorn and beer and sit back for the show!


Why would anyone have to prove that God exists in order to discuss it?
Do you have to prove that Spiderman exists before you can talk about Spiderman?



try again, vince accused God of 'committing a crime', that was a pretty lame strawman, wanna try again?

The initial proposition cannot be the straw man. The straw man serves deceitfully as a faux response to the proposition.




Kirata -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:58:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

I did specify which God I was talking about. MM expanded the discussion, or he tried to. I made no reference to Buddhists or to the Hindu gods. MM introduced those straw men.

It's true that you specified the Christian God, but it is not true that MM expanded the discussion. Rather, it's a case of you trying to narrow and divert it. The topic title considers the broad sweep of religion. Its focus isn't the Christian God, and the "problem of evil" which so preoccupies you not only has nothing to do with topic, it isn't even a problem for religion generally. I don't know why you find it necessary to pollute every attempt at intelligent discussion with your peculiar obsessions, but your ludicrous attempt to accuse others of trying to "expand" the discussion is really quite droll.

K.




Kirata -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 10:12:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

MM and Kirata have tried to expand my comments. they are the parents of straw men in this thread.

See previous.

K.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 10:48:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Well God may seem as a serial killer to some people just like abortion seems like murder to some people. It's a matter of perspective, which if God is real, His perspective is probably a bit broader than any of ours.


Right. God's will be done. [8|]

People are killed everyday by nature. God, we are told in the West, created Nature. Ergo . . . .



so then its the creators fault? Therefore Winchester, Remington, Smith Wesson et al are to blame for all the shootings caused by their creation.

If you have a child who grows into an adult and rapes someone that is also your fault cuz you made em is that right?

Square that up for us.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 10:58:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

From Wiki . .

The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world.[2][12][14][note 1] The problem may be described either experientially or theoretically.[2] The experiential problem is the difficulty in believing in a concept of loving God when confronted by suffering or evil in the real world, such as from epidemics, or wars, or murder, or rape or terror attacks wherein innocent children, women, men or a loved one becomes a victim.[17][18][19] The problem of evil is also a theoretical one, usually described and studied by religion scholars in two varieties: the logical problem and the evidential problem.[2]

Human suffering takes place at the hands of Nature and at the hands of other humans. The latter raised the issue of free will and responsibility; I presented a very narrow Brief in order to avoid the issue of free will. Only an omnipotent and merciless Christian God could rain volcanic ash and lava down upon innocent infants. (Not to ignore Yahweh, who was a nasty and irascible old fellow.) I further limited my Brief to the experiential component, not the theoretical. MM and Kirata have tried to expand my comments. they are the parents of straw men in this thread.


Firs I would love the meet the person that 'confronted God'? Name address please?

epidemics, or wars, or murder, or rape or terror attacks wherein innocent children, women, men or a loved one becomes a victim

So then you think God does all those things?

That Nature is God? I suppose suicide is Gods fault too because he gave us hands because which we can kill ourselves with?

Vince, you dont see a problem here?





heavyblinker -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 2:41:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Last chance, 'QUOTE' where it says or implies God 'does' everything.


That page I linked to provided an abundance of quotes regarding God's omnipotence, but okay:

quote:

John 1:3

All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.


ALL THINGS-- as far as I can tell, that includes everything that has happened, everything that is happening, and everything that will happen.

http://biblehub.com/john/1-3.htm

I suppose you could argue this was an oversight, an unreliable source, clumsy wording or that 'all things' doesn't literally mean 'everything' and that God simply created the thing that would eventually become all things... but this notion doesn't seem so complicated to me that if whoever was communicating with God at the time had wanted to express that, they wouldn't have been able to.




heavyblinker -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/13/2017 3:23:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
It's true that you specified the Christian God, but it is not true that MM expanded the discussion. Rather, it's a case of you trying to narrow and divert it.


It beats the impossible task of trying to talk about every single version of God at once.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375