vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/12/2017 9:38:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Assuming God is responsible for everything. The Buddhists wouldn't agree. I suspect the problem of theodicy is much harder to wrestle with in the Abrahamic faiths, where God is often hailed as being responsible for everything. In a framework where folks sincerely say, "God saved my Mom from cancer" or "The doctors said I'd never get pregnant, but God sent me a baby," it's not surprising that folks would also ask "Why did God take our toddler?" or "Why is Dad dying by degrees as the ALS rages?" you always get some one using a quote from a dilbrain off the street that cant even spell God, as a disingenuous representation of a religious position. God does everything, people suffer and die therefore God is a criminal, Vince really went over the top on that one. Why dont these people bring in theology or philosophy and take one step out of the mud for mankind Vince did not invent the problem of theodicy. Your lack of awareness of the issue does not mean there is no history to it. From Wiki . . The problem of evil refers to the challenge of reconciling belief in an omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent God, with the existence of evil and suffering in the world.[2][12][14][note 1] The problem may be described either experientially or theoretically.[2] The experiential problem is the difficulty in believing in a concept of loving God when confronted by suffering or evil in the real world, such as from epidemics, or wars, or murder, or rape or terror attacks wherein innocent children, women, men or a loved one becomes a victim.[17][18][19] The problem of evil is also a theoretical one, usually described and studied by religion scholars in two varieties: the logical problem and the evidential problem.[2] Human suffering takes place at the hands of Nature and at the hands of other humans. The latter raised the issue of free will and responsibility; I presented a very narrow Brief in order to avoid the issue of free will. Only an omnipotent and merciless Christian God could rain volcanic ash and lava down upon innocent infants. (Not to ignore Yahweh, who was a nasty and irascible old fellow.) I further limited my Brief to the experiential component, not the theoretical. MM and Kirata have tried to expand my comments. they are the parents of straw men in this thread.
|
|
|
|