RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/16/2017 5:21:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Old Testament God vs. New Testament God

Matured? Anger Management? Birth of Son Calmed him down?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XhnOVsxEJM

Apparently, the fairytale book is not sure who's son he is. In fact, real murky on that, in diverse places in the fairytale.. Either god was trying to deadbeat on the child support thing, or the book did not come from gods mouth to our ears.

Selah




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/16/2017 5:29:34 PM)

The god of the israelites killed, the god of the christians killed. Just like the "People' voted on all amendments. That is why even you in your retardation put it in quotes.




Musicmystery -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/16/2017 5:58:04 PM)

Hell, the Norse god got hung upside down, blinded, and ultimately, immolated.

Egyptian and Hindu gods likewise got killed.

It's an occupational hazard.




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/16/2017 6:13:27 PM)

and Odin hung on 3 crosses for 9 days, not just a few hours like that pussy jeebus.




tamaka -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/16/2017 9:53:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and Odin hung on 3 crosses for 9 days, not just a few hours like that pussy jeebus.


How long do you think you'd last?




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/16/2017 10:51:12 PM)

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? [8|] LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 4:53:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and Odin hung on 3 crosses for 9 days, not just a few hours like that pussy jeebus.


How long do you think you'd last?

Not as long as Odin, but as long as the thousands of others who were crucified just as horridly, or burned at the stake, and didnt get to be Jeebus.




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 4:57:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? [8|] LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working




Musicmystery -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 5:59:42 AM)

There are those who would dispute they've never been seen.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 6:44:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

But you first have to show God created the 'event'. You can throw all the ingredients of a cake in a pan but it wont bake until some other element is added, that element being heat. Just because God created bature does not mean everything that can occur in nature is God's fault as vince is trying to argue. I pointed that out with the gun example and he dissed as not relevant, and now we go full circle again on the same point without any direct counter argument from the vince side.

It is all in the design, RO. If the brakes are faulty we blame the engineer. If the O rings don't seal we blame the designer. If the brain of the child harbors a tumor, who should we blame?

And secondly, did Jesus not part the waters on the Galilee? Did he not demonstrate his power over Nature? Is Nature not powered by God? Or does Nature have the power to resist God?

Is God Omnipotent or is he a wuss?





Again your reasoning is flawed:

Omnipotent means having unlimited power; able to do anything.

You assume yourself to be God by judging Gods [in]action(s) and nowhere in the words you use as your premise to accuse God of being a criminal is there so much as a hint of 'requirement' for God to actually 'do' anything. Hence it is the option of God based upon whatever God's reasons are not mine or yours. Having the power does not imply a necessity to use the power, which in reverse can be said because you have a nuke you must use it to wipe out a city of bad guys. One need not look further thean the definition of onipoten5t

You are demanding from me to know and explain to you the mind of God, and litigate on God's behalf with the assumption I know the whole scope of what God knows.

Good and evil is all in the design, mankind has a choice. Because evil exists does not mean mankind must choose it, despite its popularity today.


Straw man. I wrote about the "evils" of Nature, not of mankind.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 10:50:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

But you first have to show God created the 'event'. You can throw all the ingredients of a cake in a pan but it wont bake until some other element is added, that element being heat. Just because God created bature does not mean everything that can occur in nature is God's fault as vince is trying to argue. I pointed that out with the gun example and he dissed as not relevant, and now we go full circle again on the same point without any direct counter argument from the vince side.

It is all in the design, RO. If the brakes are faulty we blame the engineer. If the O rings don't seal we blame the designer. If the brain of the child harbors a tumor, who should we blame?

And secondly, did Jesus not part the waters on the Galilee? Did he not demonstrate his power over Nature? Is Nature not powered by God? Or does Nature have the power to resist God?

Is God Omnipotent or is he a wuss?





Again your reasoning is flawed:

Omnipotent means having unlimited power; able to do anything.

You assume yourself to be God by judging Gods [in]action(s) and nowhere in the words you use as your premise to accuse God of being a criminal is there so much as a hint of 'requirement' for God to actually 'do' anything. Hence it is the option of God based upon whatever God's reasons are not mine or yours. Having the power does not imply a necessity to use the power, which in reverse can be said because you have a nuke you must use it to wipe out a city of bad guys. One need not look further thean the definition of onipoten5t

You are demanding from me to know and explain to you the mind of God, and litigate on God's behalf with the assumption I know the whole scope of what God knows.

Good and evil is all in the design, mankind has a choice. Because evil exists does not mean mankind must choose it, despite its popularity today.


Straw man. I wrote about the "evils" of Nature, not of mankind.


Since 'evil' is defined as [profound immorality, wickedness, and depravity] to be evil something would require a conscious malicious effort be made in order to identify it as evil.

Now you would have us believe that nature is scheming and consciously plotting its next evil attack on mankind to do untold harm. [8|]

The problem with simply attempting to proffer an argument then support it with foolish rhetoric is that in the end you always look the fool when rudimentary philosophy backs you into a corner with no way out.





Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 11:05:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? [8|] LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working



Seems you have big problems.

The Triune God of Christianity, became flesh and blood (transubstantiated), and walked among us, too bad you missed it. You managed to kill the body, the flesh and blood, but you did not kill God nor did you kill the Holy Spirit.

I sort of doubt you would ever see so much as a hint of anything what so ever about God since you spend all your time cursing God. [8|]






mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 11:26:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? [8|] LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working



Seems you have big problems.

The Triune God of Christianity, became flesh and blood (transubstantiated), and walked among us, too bad you missed it. You managed to kill the body, the flesh and blood, but you did not kill God nor did you kill the Holy Spirit.

I sort of doubt you would ever see so much as a hint of anything what so ever about God since you spend all your time cursing God. [8|]




Ja, trouble with you retards is someone who is as fucking retarded as you are writes some fantastick toilet lick, and now you got some three headed monster, who nobody, and I mean nobody has ever seen, who does not talk, who does not interact, who you retards missed that never walked amongst you, not existing and so on. And kills the human body and spirit, but not the hallucinations of you retarded fucks. Go transubstantiate your felchgobbling asswipe, dumbass.




tamaka -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 1:00:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

wow beevus thats briliant, how do you kill a triune God? [8|] LOL
We arent talking about any constitution, better double down on your meds before you post

well, buttlick, a triune god? seems like he was one once, after they got rid of his wife in the original fairytale, but you have the problem that jeebus prayed to what he called his father, and never proclaimed himself, or the holy spirit god.

By the Three, what a changeable impotent god you have.

And now we aint seen none of these three, so theres the proof the invisibility cloak is working



Seems you have big problems.

The Triune God of Christianity, became flesh and blood (transubstantiated), and walked among us, too bad you missed it. You managed to kill the body, the flesh and blood, but you did not kill God nor did you kill the Holy Spirit.

I sort of doubt you would ever see so much as a hint of anything what so ever about God since you spend all your time cursing God. [8|]




Ja, trouble with you retards is someone who is as fucking retarded as you are writes some fantastick toilet lick, and now you got some three headed monster, who nobody, and I mean nobody has ever seen, who does not talk, who does not interact, who you retards missed that never walked amongst you, not existing and so on. And kills the human body and spirit, but not the hallucinations of you retarded fucks. Go transubstantiate your felchgobbling asswipe, dumbass.


Many people have experienced God's interaction.




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 1:04:11 PM)

Really, any videos? Is it repeatable under known conditions? What color are his eyes? How big are his feet? Does he wear clown makeup?

Many people have interacted thru their anus with aliens, Eric Cartmann for example, and has the video.

Bigfoot? Loch Ness Monster? Even a fuzzy picture from far off for us to gander at?





Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 1:36:28 PM)

So much hatred, you must be off your meds again, you are denying recorded history......again.
Dont worry, I am confident that you will never see God regardless its been recorded in secular history and the sacred texts of the Jews.


Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome....[5]
-Tacitus, Annals 15.44, cited in Strobel, The Case for Christ, 82.

Lucian
The Christians ... worship a man to this day – the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account.... [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.
-Lucian, "The Death of Peregrine", 11-13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4., cited in Habermas, The Historical Jesus, 206.

Babylonian Talmud <-the Jewish Bible[8|]
On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald ... cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy."

Josephus
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.
-Josephus, Antiquities 18.63-64, cited in Yamauchi, "Jesus Outside the New Testament", 212


Let's summarize what we've learned about Jesus from this examination of ancient non-Christian sources. First, both Josephus and Lucian indicate that Jesus was regarded as wise. Second, Pliny, the Talmud, and Lucian imply He was a powerful and revered teacher. Third, both Josephus and the Talmud indicate He performed miraculous feats. Fourth, Tacitus, Josephus, the Talmud, and Lucian all mention that He was crucified. Tacitus and Josephus say this occurred under Pontius Pilate. And the Talmud declares it happened on the eve of Passover. Fifth, there are possible references to the Christian belief in Jesus' resurrection in both Tacitus and Josephus. Sixth, Josephus records that Jesus' followers believed He was the Christ, or Messiah. And finally, both Pliny and Lucian indicate that Christians worshipped Jesus as God!

http://www.bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources

Face it everyone seen him but you.




vincentML -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 1:52:34 PM)

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:


Straw man. I wrote about the "evils" of Nature, not of mankind.

quote:


Since 'evil' is defined as [profound immorality, wickedness, and depravity] to be evil something would require a conscious malicious effort be made in order to identify it as evil.

Now you would have us believe that nature is scheming and consciously plotting its next evil attack on mankind to do untold harm. [8|]

The problem with simply attempting to proffer an argument then support it with foolish rhetoric is that in the end you always look the fool when rudimentary philosophy backs you into a corner with no way out.

That is why I applied quotes to evil, silly. God's Nature is murderous but I never said there was a plot against humankind. It may be just neglect or even careless disdain by God. Certainly, he has been absent. Perhaps we can reduce the charge to Manslaughter One if he wants a plea bargain.

[:D]




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 2:43:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

So much hatred, you must be off your meds again, you are denying recorded history......again.
Dont worry, I am confident that you will never see God regardless its been recorded in secular history and the sacred texts of the Jews.


Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome....[5]
-Tacitus, Annals 15.44, cited in Strobel, The Case for Christ, 82.

Lucian
The Christians ... worship a man to this day – the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account.... [It] was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws.
-Lucian, "The Death of Peregrine", 11-13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4., cited in Habermas, The Historical Jesus, 206.

Babylonian Talmud <-the Jewish Bible[8|]
On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald ... cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy."

Josephus
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.
-Josephus, Antiquities 18.63-64, cited in Yamauchi, "Jesus Outside the New Testament", 212


Let's summarize what we've learned about Jesus from this examination of ancient non-Christian sources. First, both Josephus and Lucian indicate that Jesus was regarded as wise. Second, Pliny, the Talmud, and Lucian imply He was a powerful and revered teacher. Third, both Josephus and the Talmud indicate He performed miraculous feats. Fourth, Tacitus, Josephus, the Talmud, and Lucian all mention that He was crucified. Tacitus and Josephus say this occurred under Pontius Pilate. And the Talmud declares it happened on the eve of Passover. Fifth, there are possible references to the Christian belief in Jesus' resurrection in both Tacitus and Josephus. Sixth, Josephus records that Jesus' followers believed He was the Christ, or Messiah. And finally, both Pliny and Lucian indicate that Christians worshipped Jesus as God!

http://www.bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources

Face it everyone seen him but you.


So, dipshit, you have so much stupidity, you must still be a fucking useless retard, you have a Joshua, who was crucified, and written about in fables 100-500 years later, not from original sources, there are possible references to your retardation in Nostradamus and the Babylonian talmud written 500 years later tells of a Joshua who was hanged.

The first and earliest commentary calls it a mischievious superstition, the rest dont say much about anything.

Uh, Jesus H Fucking Christ, you think these guys are pointing to god here? Why wouldnt they at least say that he turned water into wine, or healed lepers, of course there can be only one Joshua who was crucified in all Israel. There was a historical Joshua, there was a historical Odin, a historical Buddha. There was also a historical George Washington who did not say, I cannot tell a lie, I chopped down the cherry tree. One cannot conflate a name with their fables as gospel. In only one of these cases, ever, do we have the actual words AT THE TIME from an eyewitness to the events. George Washingtons mother, and she called bullshit on the fable.

The rest have no direct eyewitness testimony and Joshua is not god, He never even in the fairytale claimed to be.

You got your dick in your hands, no proof of Jeebus as portrayed in the fairytale, only one bit with a guy named Yeshua. Now, was it Yeshua ha'Notzri, was it yeshua ben Ganesh?

In the timeline of the book of fairytales, Yeshua was the 6th most common name in Israel.
Nobody has implied shit, dumbass, nor had one of these guys seen him. And nobody (we have absolutely no eyewitnesses to the miracles he performed, or his rising or any other thing.

There are ignorant nutsuckers who worship St. Wrinklemeat whos fable is Yuge, but who was a talking dildo in a necktie.
There are ignorant nutsuckers who worship Twitler, who is a fucking imbecile, not unlike you. So, even these once eyewitnesses tell a story that gets better in the telling, but is not only not accurate, but does not coincide with reality or any fact.

you have a great deal of pud pounding but no learned nor credible arguments.




Real0ne -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 3:12:46 PM)

Jesus appeared 12 times to different group sizes ranging from just one person to 500 people.

1) Mary Magdalene (Mark 16.9-11; John 20.11-18), Peter in Jerusalem (Luke 24.34; 1 Cor. 15.5), Jesus' brother (insider skeptic) James (1 Cor. 15.7). "And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any [man]; for they were afraid" (Mark 16.8). Some of the New Testament authors explicitly claimed to be eyewitnesses to Jesus' resurrection (and transfiguration). Peter said, "We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty" (2 Pet. 2.16). John also said, "That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched...we proclaim to you what we have seen and heard" (1 John 1.1,3).
2) The other women at the tomb (Matthew 28.8-10).
3) The two travelers on the road (Mark 16.12,13; Luke 24.13-34).
4) Ten disciples behind closed doors (Mark 16.14; Luke 24.35-43; John 20.19-25).
5) All the disciples, with Thomas, excluding Judas Iscariot (John 20.26-31; 1 Cor. 15.5).
6) Seven disciples while fishing (John 21.1-14).
7) Eleven disciples on the mountain (Matthew 28.16-20).
8) A crowd of 500 "most of whom are still alive" at the time of Paul writing (1 Cor. 15.6). This may have been the same group as in Matt. 28.16: the rendezvous was to "to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them." Unlike the other accounts which were unexpected and by surprise, and to gather such a large number of people, this meeting was held outdoors. The women were told to tell the disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee as well. "And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted" (Matt. 28.17) may be a reference to many present, both believers and non-believers. Paul had firsthand contact with them. So it was not a legend. He knew some of the people had died in the interim, but most were still alive. He is saying in effect they are still around to be questioned. You can talk to some of the witnesses. He never could have made this challenge if this event had not occurred.
9) "Then to all the apostles" (1 Cor. 15.7) which includes the Twelve plus all the other apostles.
10) Jesus appeared to the disciples in Jerusalem (Luke 24.44-49).
11) Those who watched Jesus ascend to heaven (Mark 16.19,20; Luke 24.50-53; Acts 1.3-8).
12) Least of all Paul (outsider skeptic) with others present and as though he was not living in the proper time (1 Cor. 15.8-9; Gal. 1.13-16; Acts 9.1-8, 22.9, read all of chapters 22 and 26; 13.30-37; 1 Cor. 15.10-20; Gal. 2.1-10).


sure got around a lot for a dead guy




mnottertail -> RE: Are Science and Religion incompatible? (1/17/2017 5:09:33 PM)

The books of the bible were written some 2-400 years after the events (that did not happen) and were picked and chosen with many other books ignored from the various numerous versions around at the time.


You still got your little peener in your hands, no eyewitness accounts, no actual facts.

Paul who listened to a talkng ass lived some time after Jeebus, and we will just call that one your bad.

There are 12 women who have accused Twitler of molesting them. So, I guess we are a horse apiece, Twitler is a serial rapist, and Jeebus is the Jeebus of Jeebuses.

I have 12 witnesses that tell me that the trees moving makes the wind blow.

Everybody sure gets around for a dead guy, my witnesses are alive and here now, Jeebus is as dead as he was centuries ago, and he dont get around much. Fact is, he don't get around at all. Got a video? something current? Say last 100 years?




Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625