ThatDizzyChick
Posts: 5490
Status: offline
|
A big part of the problem is that your view of what media stories the public believes is based entirely on which such stories the media itself covers. And given the basic appeal of sensationalism inherent in almost all media, you don't hear about the people who believe the fact-based stories, there is no reader appeal in stories about millions of people believing true stories, or in millions of people rejecting false stories. What gets the attention is the people believing the bullshit because that is funny, it allows us to tell oursleves we are superior to the dumb rubes who fell for the bullshit. And thus, those are the stories that get covered, the media focuses on those stories, thus giving the impression that these stories represent the vast majority, when in fact they very likely do not. It is the same thing as the stories you see about how "the Internet" has gone crazy over some dumb thing, and the evidence is like 4 or 5 Tweets, as if those 4 or 5 people on one site somehow equate to "the Internet". This is not actually a new problem, and I pointed out where it would lead years ago when I first noticed the media reporting on itself, when the other networks started covering what Fox news said as news in and of itself, it creates an incestuous closed loop where what happens is not the news, but how the media reports what happens has become the news. The news has stopped being the news and the news programs have now become the news.
_____________________________
Not your average bimbo.
|