RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 12:53:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

So maybe they need to have a learning experience that'll encourage them to consider their actions a bit more carefully in future.


The Democrats are having that, just a coastal party now

The Republicans haven't even taken the reigns yet, so all of your wild-eyed pontificating is just brain farts in the wind




Lucylastic -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 1:11:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

So maybe they need to have a learning experience that'll encourage them to consider their actions a bit more carefully in future.


The Democrats are having that, just a coastal party now

The Republicans haven't even taken the reigns yet, so all of your wild-eyed pontificating is just brain farts in the wind

THe senate and house have been repub how long? the past 2 years? your bullshit, is still bullshit.


the repubs did this, not trump.
Im pretty sure his plan will be decided when the fallout (from the repub deciding those six items can be repealed)
until then he hasnt got a clue.







kdsub -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 1:29:43 PM)

Just wondering... do you think when this program is canceled people will be able to buy insurance cheaper?

Butch




DaddySatyr -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 1:32:39 PM)


I'm one of those people who lost my medical coverage (that I liked), apparently forever, at this point due to ObummerCare. So, on this issue, at this point, I'm forced into a "who-gives-a-fat-rat's-ass" position.



Michael




Kirata -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 1:50:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

"Healthcare Is Not a Human Right"

(and disagreement over that is another essential difference between the comrades and most of the rest of us)

Among the comrades:

"Health is not a consumer good but a universal right, so access to health services cannot be a privilege," the pope said May 7 during a meeting with members, volunteers and supporters of Doctors with Africa, a medical mission begun by the Diocese of Padua, Italy, 65 years ago.

http://www.catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2016/health-care-is-a-right-not-a-privilege-pope-says.cfm


While numerous efforts have been made throughout
the 20th and early 21st centuries to provide universal health
care benefits, perhaps no organization or institution has
supported the issue as strongly as the Catholic Church.
First addressed by Pope John XXIII in the landmark
encyclical letter Pacem in Terris, health care is deemed
by the Church as a basic human right, along with life,
food, clothing and shelter. The Catechism of the Catholic
Church explains that the political community has a duty
to ensure the right to medical care (par. 2211), and further
states that the pursuit of the common good must include
health care in order to attain acceptable living conditions
(par. 2288). In fact, the Catholic Church has supported
efforts to provide universal health care coverage for at
least 90 years.


http://www.micatholic.org/assets/files/focus/focus_20100219-HealthCare.pdf

Just like food is a right, and shelter is a right, and clothing is a right, and access to prostitutes is a right, and Wifi is a right, and a cell phone is a right, and Internet access is a right

No one should ever have to provide anything for themselves, that what government is for

Say three fail Barrys and you may go

I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.

K.




kdsub -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 1:56:40 PM)

Then you think you will get your old benefits back?




BoscoX -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 2:21:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.

K.
[/font]


Where does it end though. We have programs for the poor already that could have been tweaked. What we are seeing from the left are endless new vote buying programs that we as a nation cannot afford. MM has a thread, he just now discovered that we have massive debt - and that is Trumps fault, of course because these things are just tools to the left. There is no truth, the only thing that matters is power, and winning at politics. Has nothing (or very little to do with) helping average people. Hillary was all about Hillary, and she was a little too obvious about it to succeed. Making people dependent on handouts is extremely counterproductive, but that really seems to be the goal for many of these vote buying programs







bounty44 -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 2:22:10 PM)

im aware within the catholic church there are such positions, but you'll notice, at least in so much as I can tell, they don't actually give an argument as opposed to just stating a position.

and I would say this---I would be all for the church themselves offering universal health care/coverage.





bounty44 -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 2:24:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.
K.
[/font]


I agree, and I think within the libertarian perspective, there is certainly room for that.




vincentML -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 2:27:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

"Healthcare Is Not a Human Right"

(and disagreement over that is another essential difference between the comrades and most of the rest of us)

Among the comrades:

"Health is not a consumer good but a universal right, so access to health services cannot be a privilege," the pope said May 7 during a meeting with members, volunteers and supporters of Doctors with Africa, a medical mission begun by the Diocese of Padua, Italy, 65 years ago.

http://www.catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2016/health-care-is-a-right-not-a-privilege-pope-says.cfm


While numerous efforts have been made throughout
the 20th and early 21st centuries to provide universal health
care benefits, perhaps no organization or institution has
supported the issue as strongly as the Catholic Church.
First addressed by Pope John XXIII in the landmark
encyclical letter Pacem in Terris, health care is deemed
by the Church as a basic human right, along with life,
food, clothing and shelter. The Catechism of the Catholic
Church explains that the political community has a duty
to ensure the right to medical care (par. 2211), and further
states that the pursuit of the common good must include
health care in order to attain acceptable living conditions
(par. 2288). In fact, the Catholic Church has supported
efforts to provide universal health care coverage for at
least 90 years.


http://www.micatholic.org/assets/files/focus/focus_20100219-HealthCare.pdf

Just like food is a right, and shelter is a right, and clothing is a right, and access to prostitutes is a right, and Wifi is a right, and a cell phone is a right, and Internet access is a right

No one should ever have to provide anything for themselves, that what government is for

Say three fail Barrys and you may go

I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.

K.


Well written sentiments.
I am waiting for someone to accuse you of being a socialist.

[sm=popcorn.gif]




dcnovice -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 2:43:58 PM)

quote:

I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.

Beautifully said, Kirata. Thank you.




dcnovice -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 2:50:11 PM)

quote:

im aware within the catholic church there are such positions,

Isn't the official catechism a bit more than a position within the church?




stef -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 3:10:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I'm one of those people who lost my medical coverage (that I liked), apparently forever, at this point due to ObummerCare. So, on this issue, at this point, I'm forced into a "who-gives-a-fat-rat's-ass" position.

Is that any different than your usual "head stuck up your ass" position?




Real0ne -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 3:17:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.

K.
[/font]


Where does it end though. We have programs for the poor already that could have been tweaked. What we are seeing from the left are endless new vote buying programs that we as a nation cannot afford. MM has a thread, he just now discovered that we have massive debt - and that is Trumps fault, of course because these things are just tools to the left. There is no truth, the only thing that matters is power, and winning at politics. Has nothing (or very little to do with) helping average people. Hillary was all about Hillary, and she was a little too obvious about it to succeed. Making people dependent on handouts is extremely counterproductive, but that really seems to be the goal for many of these vote buying programs







health care is commercial, the gubmint insured it is commercial by taking it over and regulating. There is no compassion in commerce. Furthermore as I said time and time eternal that universal healthcare is absolutely NOT compatible with capitalism. It has to be designed within the rules of capitalism and it cant be, no matter how much anyone tries it will be a bastardized system.

The very minimum to be successful the whole damn thing would hav eot come under gubmint umbrella, and of course that would wipe out the healthcare insurance industry.






Real0ne -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 3:24:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


I'm one of those people who lost my medical coverage (that I liked), apparently forever, at this point due to ObummerCare. So, on this issue, at this point, I'm forced into a "who-gives-a-fat-rat's-ass" position.



Michael




Dont shit yourself that was not by design.
The math is so simple an elementary school student could cipher and predict that would happen, and as usual when da gub does shit llike this, the time it takes to sort all this out someone is making a fucking boatload and who ya gonna sue? Congress? Welcome to tyranny inc.




bounty44 -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 4:06:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

im aware within the catholic church there are such positions,

Isn't the official catechism a bit more than a position within the church?


no and yes. my use of the word "position" wasn't intended in the least as diminishing what the catholics officially believe.

that said, church positions and the catechism are inextricably bound up in each other.







SecondBestBoy -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 4:08:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I'm one of those people who lost my medical coverage (that I liked), apparently forever, at this point due to ObummerCare. So, on this issue, at this point, I'm forced into a "who-gives-a-fat-rat's-ass" position.



Well then, you're quite a Special Snowflake. Although the Right has relentlessly cultivated this line as its latest misleading mantra to get useful idiot Trumpvoter types to vote against their own interests, the truth was that only a tiny sliver of Americans "lost" their health insurance due to the ACA. And those were only because they were shitty plans, at that.

http://www.factcheck.org/2014/04/millions-lost-insurance/

Bonus tip for more effectively trolling, DaddySatyr: maybe don't tip your hand so obviously by including one of the right's inane playground epithets for our outgoing president, if you want bystanders to take you seriously as Concern Troll.




Diffident -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 4:10:24 PM)

[image]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1wCQm7UsAAu_ke.jpg[/image]





Wayward5oul -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 4:49:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Diffident

[image]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1wCQm7UsAAu_ke.jpg[/image]



I have seen several of these today, along with posts and tweets of other Trump voters who now regret voting for him for this or other reasons. He hasn't even taken office yet, but something tells me that were the election to be held today, the results would be quite different.

Let me be clear- I am not trying to say that the election is invalid or that there should be a do-over or anything like that. Regardless of other forces that made attempts to influence the outcome, regardless of how successful they may or may not have been, regardless of whatever else anyone else did to try and influence voters, the act of voting was not compromised. People's opinions may have been influenced, but the whole purpose of campaigns is to sway opinions. Who did it and why is a separate issue and should be investigated, but in terms of the election, the actual voting process was not compromised. Any determination beyond that could easily be dismissed as partisan politics.

But I really do believe that were the election to be held today rather than back in November, Trump would not be elected. What I am seeing on social media is a whole lot of buyers' remorse. That's not biased media reports. That's social media, actual people expressing regret, expressing fear of losing jobs and losing insurance.




Musicmystery -> RE: Dismayed Trump voters tweet about losing their Obamacare benefits (1/15/2017 4:53:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

I take your point. But setting aside the debate over "rights," some things are simply necessary components of a compassionate society, and we cannot treat those things as commodities. If you can't afford a coronary bypass, a nose-job that you can afford is not a substitute. So regardless of the political system, I don't see how the provision of health care to the poor, the elderly, and the infirm whose finances are inadequate to their needs can be viewed as anything but a necessity in a society that cares about its members.

Beautifully said, Kirata. Thank you.

Word.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625