RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (1/31/2017 11:59:42 AM)

Read my sigline you fucking retard.




bounty44 -> RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (1/31/2017 1:03:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
The compromise is to save the lives of babies... is this not worthy?


there is no compromise. pro abortion want to be able to kill their babies. it doesn't matter if there are less babies to abort, they still want to be able to do that. wtf?

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

As far borders they seemed to work just fine until the lure of Jobs... eliminate the jobs and eliminate the problem. This would be a much cheaper alternative to a wall that has proven not to work...over and over.



again, wtf? it doesn't matter if a million come over, or if 57 come over. creating economic/legal positions in America that make illegals less likely to come here is NOT a compromise between those who say people should be able to come willy nilly, and those who want tight borders.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

When it comes to torture there is no need for compromise... Although the intent was there in Trump and his administration his own party refused to allow it...as they did with Bush... Only the likes of you think it admissible... Thank heavens you are in the minority of Americans that think it is justified.

Butch


before you even get to the debate as to whether torture is ever justified or not---of course you get to be the arbiter of what torture is. never mind that other people disagree with you on that. how convenient for your compromise paradigm.

as for "the likes of me"----you have no real idea what my view is on waterboarding or torture. though im sorry to say it; really, fuck you.









mnottertail -> RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (1/31/2017 1:15:42 PM)

Well a reknown coward and nutsucker such as yourself dogshit44 not being a veteran or anything or serving this country in any way, are not qualified (particularly with your atrocious English, and demonstrated lack of fact) to hold forth on the alternative factless nutsuckerism of the necessary and sufficient conditions of the definition of torture.





bounty44 -> RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (1/31/2017 1:24:24 PM)

[image]http://cdn.smosh.com/sites/default/files/legacy.images/smosh-pit/112010/main-troll.jpg[/image]




MrRodgers -> RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (1/31/2017 1:31:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

The compromise is to save the lives of babies... is this not worthy?

As far borders they seemed to work just fine until the lure of Jobs... eliminate the jobs and eliminate the problem. This would be a much cheaper alternative to a wall that has proven not to work...over and over.

When it comes to torture there is no need for compromise... Although the intent was there in Trump and his administration his own party refused to allow it...as they did with Bush... Only the likes of you think it admissible... Thank heavens you are in the minority of Americans that think it is justified.

Butch

But we are here to make a profit and yes...the highest possible profit. So we are allowed to lobby for (purchase) H1B visa and temporary worker programs to get foreign workers in that we can pay less and increase profits.

Then if they overstay their visas and even have kids that are then naturalized citizens, well that may be an 'illegal' immigration problem but that's not 'our' problem. Now it's the govt.'s problem.





MrRodgers -> RE: Eliot Cohen: A "Testing Time" for Conservatives (1/31/2017 2:02:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Milesnmiles

I am constantly amazed by these “Trump threads” and how Trumpeters continue to be dazzled by Trump.

They’ll say things like; “Then we ran a guy with brass balls and he beat them so badly they must have thought they were married to Muslims”.

First, how does getting 3,000,000 more popular votes mean you were beaten badly? Even the electoral college vote was not a landslide.

Why does being married to a Muslim equate to being beaten badly, is that some kind of bad ethnic slur?

And last Trump doesn’t have brass anything, he is merely an egotistical misogynistic liar that doesn’t have a clue and lot of Americans were fooled by him and are now in denial.



The Koran and other Muslim teachings preach that Muslims shall capture women and use them as slaves, to beat all women, a womans testimony isn't worth a man's, a woman shall not share equally in an inheritance with men, and that if a woman goes out uncovered or unaccompanied by a male relative they may be raped or horrifically abused in any way deemed fit

So it isn't a slur, is it. It seems like that if Muslims didn't want such things pointed out about them they would renounce their death / rape cult post haste

It's pretty close contest between the Quran and the Bible as to which is more violent and yes, even teaching of that violence and there is a large school of thought that will tell you that the bible is as or more violent, than the Quran.

And no, you don't get cherry pick form either book, the instruction to violence is there plain and simple in both books and for certain offenses and purposes...equally indiscriminate.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875