|
tweakabelle -> RE: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban' (2/2/2017 4:00:59 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
FR
The truth about Trump's ban is, apparently, that he'd like to see an increase in Islamic terrorist attacks on Americans. Trump's move delights ISIS:
http://uk.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-isis-candidate-analysts-2016-9
Gay nightclubs provide observant Muslims with more recruitment material than probably anything else there is. What should be done about that
Wow! What a significant, prescient insight! One has to wonder about the type of mind that creates such gems as this. I say "creates" because as far as I am aware, there isn't a shred of evidence anywhere to support this claim, so it was created rather than arrived at as a conclusion after a long and rigourous examination of the relevant facts, which is the way most sensiblle and informed people arrive at their conclusions.
I wonder what made Bosco prioritise gay nightclubs as recruitment material over, say, the invasion of Iraq, the constant drone attacks in NW Pakistan and Yemen that kill thousands of civilians, the festering sore that is the never ending Israeli occupation of Palestine and brutal repression of Palestinians ... All of which seem far more likely candidates to me. Perhaps, in his ideologically driven haste to remove Western military aggression as a potential cause of Islamic terrorism, 'gay nightclubs' was the first potential explanation that entered his mind that wouldn't boomerang and highlight the very Western military aggression he was trying so hard to gloss over? It couldn't possibly be his own antipathy towards gays that caused him to gravitate so sharply and speedily towards gay behaviour in the US as a recruitment factor for Islamic terrorists, could it?
But perhaps he does have a point - after all the sight of so many buffed, well dressed and (shock horror gasp!) happy men does have certain effects on some people, effects that are not always the most positive and/or welcome effects imaginable. Perhaps we should pass the idea on to Mr Spicer at the White House, who seems to be having terrible problems articulating the new Administration's agenda and is in need of all the help he can get .... "Alternative" explanations seem to carry a premium in Washington these days.
Oh BS. Obama and Clinton (the rape apologist) wouldn't say the word "terrorist" because they said it was a recruiting tool. The terrorists, who throw gay people off of tall buildings, use all forms of what they call American decadence as recruiting tools. You're just being an idiot trying to sound smart.
No I am just making the obvious and eminently reasonable point that invading Muslim countries and causing hundreds of thousands of casualties, carrying out drone attacks that slaughter civilians by the hundreds or the occupation and the ongoing theft of an entire Islamic country and similar acts, all of which are orchestrated and/or carried out by the West and/or its proxies, are far better, infinitely more persuasive explanations of why some young Muslims are attracted to IS and the like, than anything that happens in a gay club.
The immediacy of having relatives slaughtered or one's country invaded by hostile foreigners does have a far more decisive effect on most people than what they might see as decadent goings-on behind closed doors thousands of miles away, (assuming of course that these people are intimately aware of what happens inside a gay club thousands of miles away, which strikes me as a rather [ahem ... ] courageous assumption). Indeed any interest in the latter is more likely generated by prurience rather than militancy, if the number of clicks on gay porn sites originating in Muslim countries is anything to go by.
|
|
|
|
