Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Keep your rioting shoes on...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 8:46:44 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

by the way everyone---I looked all the way through my anatomy and physiology, nutrition, exercise physiology, and health texts and simply cannot find anything that points to a relationship between osteoporosis and falling asleep in the middle of something.

maybe it'll be in subsequent editions?

There are four different kinds of medication for osteoporosis
Bisphosphonates
The most common side effects are nausea, abdominal pain and loose bowel movements. Bone, joint and/or muscle pain has been reported in patients taking bisphosphonates; such reports have been infrequent. There is a small risk of ulcers in the esophagus with both alendronate and risedronate, especially if taken incorrectly. The most common side effects of zoledronic acid, which usually only last a day or two, are fever, pain in the muscles, bones or joints, and headache.

Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators or Serms
side effects
Raloxifene may increase hot flashes. There is also an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (blood clots), similar to that for women using Hormone Replacement Therapy

Hormone Therapy
Side effects can include depression, headaches, breast tenderness, premenstrual syndrome, skin irritation and weight gain.
Menstrual bleeding may also occur. Experimenting with doses, types (pills, patches) and regimens may help to eliminate (or minimize) these side effects.
There is an increased risk for breast cancer, stroke and cardiovascular disease in women who take estrogen/progesterone for more than five years. Women using estrogen/progesterone are encouraged to establish regular cardiovascular and breast health monitoring programs with their doctor.

Denosumab (Bone Metabolism Regulator)
Side effects may include pain in the muscles, arms, legs or back and a skin condition with itching, redness and/or dryness. It also slightly increases the risk of cellulitis, a skin infection treated with antibiotics. In rare cases, osteonecrosis of the jaw has been reported in patients treated with denosumab.


Parathyroid hormone (PTH)
Possible side effects include dizziness, nausea and leg cramps.

Now while you may not understand side effects and other medications the lady may be taken, please excuse me for not buying your bullshit, and an update on all your "texts" is in order.

Hormone therapy on its own can create incredible tiredness, of course, if you are au fait with all the medical conditions she has, please show your working out.....




Good, you've proven the point that she can't function. But, of course, as a looney lefty she doesn't need to think. Her positions will always just be party lines.

she has more class, more intelligence under her fingernails than you have humanity, education and class put together.
Of course that she cant function is bullshit, just like all your pathetic posts

Lol, she's a whacko. I can see why you'd feel simpatico with her.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 8:47:08 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL. Yup. That will be the standing rules, and promulgated by the nutsuckers. Perfect.

You mean the Harry Reid rule mental patient.

Nope, dont mean the Harry Reid rule. You see, the nutsuckers are in charge and it will be the Nutsucker rule from this time forward.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 8:49:13 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL. Yup. That will be the standing rules, and promulgated by the nutsuckers. Perfect.

You mean the Harry Reid rule mental patient.

Nope, dont mean the Harry Reid rule. You see, the nutsuckers are in charge and it will be the Nutsucker rule from this time forward.

Well, at least until a different voice in your head decides differently.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 8:50:06 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11243
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

No it's not opinion. It's very evident you're just not that bright. You know it yourself. It's why you never offer an opinion. All you do is cut and paste other opinions.

"They" didn't delay Garland, "they" refused to consider him. Google the Biden rule used against Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last year. Or Google the Schumer rule for Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last 18 months. You liberals are so pathetic. You sit around and giggle about how clever your guy is when your guy does shit like that then you're oh so appalled when the tables are turned.


Now they scream vicious hate-filled diatribes about Talk Radio, Drudge, FOX News and other sources of real news and information because details of their massive daily hypocrisy keep going viral

Used to be they had mass media all locked up, but those days are over

Though they yearn for a way to bring them back (many of them)

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 9:10:30 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and what were the reasons the right wouldnt even listen about Garland?
I dont think they had any reason beyond pouting and delaying. Stomping their lil feetsies and saying NO*construct whinge*
you partisan hack.

When you try and make points it just shows how mentally handicapped you are.

thats opinion
just like mine, and worth as much with one exception.
you telling me they didnt delay Garland???
or what

No it's not opinion. It's very evident you're just not that bright. You know it yourself. It's why you never offer an opinion. All you do is cut and paste other opinions.

"They" didn't delay Garland, "they" refused to consider him. Google the Biden rule used against Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last year. Or Google the Schumer rule for Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last 18 months. You liberals are so pathetic. You sit around and giggle about how clever your guy is when your guy does shit like that then you're oh so appalled when the tables are turned.



Its your opinion that Im mentally handicapped...sheesh poor lil man, you seem to be throwing it around a lot, considering your lack of any kind of anything is projection.

Regarding your "biden rule.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/mar/17/context-biden-rule-supreme-court-nominations/

I prefer to counter your kind of BS with facts, Not opinion, but you still wont admit when you are wrong so you are just bullshit talking, typing, thinking and opining.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 9:15:10 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
gee I didn't see anything in there that causes one to go to sleep while working, especially as in reference to osteoporosis; did you?

oh and lucy, my whole little spiel about text books was meant to mock. it doesnt matter the text or the edition---the point was to point out, there is no connection between osteoporosis and falling asleep in the middle of your job.

and whats more, mnottertroll's point seemed to be that she was sleeping because of the condition, not any medication. alternatively, that she wasn't sleeping---that rather, because she has osteoporosis, she was----hmmm, must be just putting her head down to rest because the condition renders her too weak to hold it up??

and how about that, some critical thinking with no townhall! (oh no comrades!)

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 2/1/2017 9:38:06 AM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 9:23:48 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

and what were the reasons the right wouldnt even listen about Garland?
I dont think they had any reason beyond pouting and delaying. Stomping their lil feetsies and saying NO*construct whinge*
you partisan hack.

When you try and make points it just shows how mentally handicapped you are.

thats opinion
just like mine, and worth as much with one exception.
you telling me they didnt delay Garland???
or what

No it's not opinion. It's very evident you're just not that bright. You know it yourself. It's why you never offer an opinion. All you do is cut and paste other opinions.

"They" didn't delay Garland, "they" refused to consider him. Google the Biden rule used against Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last year. Or Google the Schumer rule for Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last 18 months. You liberals are so pathetic. You sit around and giggle about how clever your guy is when your guy does shit like that then you're oh so appalled when the tables are turned.



Its your opinion that Im mentally handicapped...sheesh poor lil man, you seem to be throwing it around a lot, considering your lack of any kind of anything is projection.

Regarding your "biden rule.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/mar/17/context-biden-rule-supreme-court-nominations/

I prefer to counter your kind of BS with facts, Not opinion, but you still wont admit when you are wrong so you are just bullshit talking, typing, thinking and opining.


LMAO. Yes it is my opinion. Just as its my opinion that a toddler shouldn't be considered to have a mature thought process. You see Lucy, and I know you don't that was rhetorical, when a person like you has a very low intelligence level it's obvious to those around her even if it's not obvious to her.

You didn't read what you posted did you? It says exactly what I said.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 9:34:22 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
The biden rule wasnt the same as Garlands situation, it has fuck all to do with it.
They delayed, BY REFUSING to hear it...
they delayed.
they delayed they delayed.
learn your big words little man, then eat your prunes.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 9:41:41 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

Naa, Chucky Shumer has them all rialed up over the visa thing. That was done intentionally so he could use the ongoing snowflake hurt anger here.


What in the fuck are you talking about ?

T^T


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 9:43:24 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

The biden rule wasnt the same as Garlands situation, it has fuck all to do with it.
They delayed, BY REFUSING to hear it...
they delayed.
they delayed they delayed.
learn your big words little man, then eat your prunes.

I know lefty looneys like to make up new meanings for words but you should just accept I'm correct. You see it's the leftist looneys in the senate that are delaying and pretending not to do so. The Republicans said they wouldn't consider Garland. They didn't pretend to delay.

The Biden rule is exactly what happened to Garland.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... - 2/1/2017 10:07:09 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
It is very evident that you are a retard, I submit as proof of your retardation:

quote:


"They" didn't delay Garland, "they" refused to consider him. Google the Biden rule used against Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last year. Or Google the Schumer rule for Bush...no SCOTUS picks in the last 18 months. You liberals are so pathetic. You sit around and giggle about how clever your guy is when your guy does shit like that then you're oh so appalled when the tables are turned.

Pretty good rule from them boys given the fact that the SCOTUS contained 9 members from 2007 to 2009, and we weren't looking for a 10th and that lousy lazy inept nutsucker did not nominate one.

Fuckin brilliant, you felchgobbling retard. Where did you get that cite? Townhall slobberblog, Perhaps directly from Sun Myun Moons Washington Times? Felched Putin jizz talking to you from Trumps asshole during one of your numerous submissive felchgobbling sessions? Oh, the voices in your feebleminded head again.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 51
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Keep your rioting shoes on... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109