RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


heavyblinker -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/5/2017 4:23:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
When attacked. For self defense. etc.

It's certainly arguable that some of Trumps decisions or actions might result in harm to the country, to the citizens. But if he's not attacking me or my family physically, (not actually possible, since two of my three sisters would take him down immediately, and one of my nieces, too) I'm not going to commit violence, nor endorse anyone else doing so.


Because you only care about yourself.
It's hardly a noble position.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
The issue is, he got voted to the position, electoral college overruling popular vote being a part of our constitution. Even if Trump fell 3 million votes short, our political process puts us in this situation, with still millions of Trump voters in any case. If those people want to be heard, then let them be heard and we'll see how it works out.


Yeah, it's not a good system.

Remember this?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2108345/Are-Americans-dumb-democracy-Scientists-claim-voters-lack-sophistication-recognize-good-ideas.html

quote:

A team at Cornell University has raised serious doubts about current electoral practices, claiming that some voters simply do not know what is happening.

They claim the best ideas are being missed because of the problem, and that the issue is leading to mediocre candidates flourishing in elections.

'Very smart ideas are going to be hard for people to adopt, because most people don’t have the sophistication to recognize how good an idea is,' said David Dunning, a psychologist at Cornell University.

The researchers found that incompetent people are inherently unable to judge the competence of other people, or the quality of those people's ideas.

For example, they found that if people lack knowledge of tax reforms, it was incredibly unlikely voters would be able to identify the candidates who are actual experts.


Stupid people voted for someone as stupid as they are because they're too stupid to know it's a bad idea... and now people who aren't stupid have to live with it.

It's a fucking disgrace.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
I know that numerous of Trump's appointments remind me of Reagan's appointments, hiring people to destroy the department they are running, etc.

But I learned that we survived that, and I learned that nobody learned a single godamned thing from the financial crisis, and I learned that I just don't give a flying fuck anymore, sorry for those who do.


I think they would probably feel sorry for you too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Violence in protests might be warranted on some occasions, in some places, if not violent to humans. The majority of violence in protest against cop killings was against buildings or vehicles, not people. An American attempting to do serious harm to Trump is just stupid beyond any reason. I don't care how much I don't like the guy or you don't like the guy or how much anyone else doesn't like him.


I think it's a lot stupider to let an incompetent piece of shit like Trump ruin the country and destabilize the rest of the world too just because he convinced a lot of idiots to vote for him.

Exactly why nobody has done anything about it before we got to this point is a mystery. I think the whole 'Hillary is going to win' thing was a big part of it... then shock... and now it seems to be some sort of misplaced belief in the infallibility of the system or some weird assumption that nothing can be done or that it could be okay or that America is invincible and can survive it.

There are so many people who could at the very least do an average job and not completely destroy 70+ years of progress. WHY do we have to suffer through this insanity?




heavyblinker -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/5/2017 4:27:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
of course not, but the fact that if you had been a voter in this country the fact that you would have voted for the loser isn't one or the justifiable reasons. An you support exactly that kind of violence while proclaiming people defending their homes to be murders.


It's not about the fucking election.
Good god this needs to stop.

But it won't, so I'll just ignore you from now on... and try not to think about how many people like you are out there.




Awareness -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/6/2017 9:01:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Caricatures of clowns

"Political violence by leftists is a uniquely American phenomenon... "
The Bolsheviks beg to differ. Leftist history is steeped in blood.




mnottertail -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/7/2017 5:08:27 AM)

Ghengis Khan To W, rightist history is steeped in blood. mustn't be prejudiced Peachy.




Musicmystery -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/7/2017 6:16:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
of course not, but the fact that if you had been a voter in this country the fact that you would have voted for the loser isn't one or the justifiable reasons. An you support exactly that kind of violence while proclaiming people defending their homes to be murders.


It's not about the fucking election.
Good god this needs to stop.

But it won't, so I'll just ignore you from now on... and try not to think about how many people like you are out there.


It's the only narrative they have.

There's no way to defend this nonsense, so they fall back. It's their way of acknowledging defeat.




Awareness -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/7/2017 7:22:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Ghengis Khan To W, rightist history is steeped in blood. mustn't be prejudiced Peachy.
No. You're wrong. I think you'll find Genghis Khan wasn't particularly political. Ideologies which promote collectivism (communism and indeed all of Chinese history, the Bolsheviks and indeed all of socialist history) inevitably kill far more people than societies which promote individuality and meritocracy. The Athenians for example, weren't particularly keen on murdering their citizens.

So yes. Leftist history is the history of violence. Right-wing history is the history of democracy - an ideology which involves the peaceful transfer of political power, rather than the violent proletarian uprisings promoted by Leftists.

And as can be clearly seen - Leftists are idiots who fail to understand history so badly, they promote lies about it.




mnottertail -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/7/2017 8:28:52 AM)

its all political.

he replaced cronyism with meritocracy.
He was an organizer of citizens and military, groups of ten, and where the romans got cohort organization from
organized the mongol script, reading and writing
unification of tribes into the country of Mongolia

Simply because he was not ruled by corporations or military-industrial complex does not make him non political.

Different countries; different customs. Dictatorship is right wing.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Milo: Media legitimizes violence on conservatives (2/7/2017 9:09:41 AM)

Where is my Black Sabbath song?

Here is a slight modification of an earlier post I did on one of dcnovice threads http://www.collarchat.com/m_4998449/tm.htm


Security! security! security! Americashire is under siege from those savage sand-dwellers and here is the maths behind it

Remind you of anyone's minions, say Hitler's.

When we worry and wonder about authoritarian regimes that inflict cruelty on civilians, we often imagine tyrannical despots unilaterally advancing their sinister agendas. But no would-be autocrat can act alone. As a practical matter, he needs subordinates willing to carry out orders. dcnovice
If you wrote that bit then I 100% agree with what you said and how you said it......subordinates - drones-minions would have been better

Now these figures are a good approximation
Death count on American soil from those 7 countires since 1971 are 0.
Death count by Americashire killing each other with guns since 1971 is ~1.3 million

Monster president screams security america is under siege

Slippernotes:
1. death on Americashire soil from those other 40 (predominately Muslim countries excluded from the ban in the last 40 years is ~5000
2. Business interests the utter nutter has, or buildings/hotels, in those seven countries = zero

Heavyblinker does actually mention the hatred and bile, idiots and the thick and what propaganda does unto them

I am vaguely aware of the one called Milo and he is an Extremist - full of alternative lying cunto of facts...is it him that owns many of these fake alt right wing sites - you will find that is a called a Ring and the perpetrators will be the same spreading poison, hatred and division for their own monetary/political agenda not for the good of human kind





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125