Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

On nutsuckers and free speech


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> On nutsuckers and free speech Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 7:28:19 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/318422-senate-votes-to-silence-warren-after-sessions-speech

Feel free to add your own examples of their constant pantshitting hipocracy and trampling of the constitution.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

Profile   Post #: 1
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 8:07:41 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		I find it strange no one has mentioned much about DeVos.
too many sparklies going on,


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 8:23:38 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/318422-senate-votes-to-silence-warren-after-sessions-speech

Feel free to add your own examples of their constant pantshitting hipocracy and trampling of the constitution.

Yeah, bitch and moan. She broke a Senate rule.

K.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 8:28:51 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline 		FR

Of course, the real target of GOP censorship wasn't Warren but Coretta Scott King, who'd written from experience about Sessions.

Apparently even dead black women who speak up are too scary for Senate Republicans.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 8:31:25 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

She broke a Senate rule.

One that appears to be quite selectively enforced.

ETA: Particularly given that Warren was quoting a third party not bound by Senate rules. This was about silencing an unwelcome voice, not protocol. And avoiding an inconvenient reminder that the Senate declined to confirm Sessions's nomination as a federal judge.

< Message edited by dcnovice -- 2/7/2017 8:47:02 PM >

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 8:34:33 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/318422-senate-votes-to-silence-warren-after-sessions-speech

Feel free to add your own examples of their constant pantshitting hipocracy and trampling of the constitution.

Yeah, bitch and moan. She broke a Senate rule.

K.


I dont believe she did, it is certainly not clear she did. I read the rule, and saw the speech. I will point out no nutsucker was clapped in irons when they disparaged Obama, or when the nutsucker Raphael Cruz disparaged Franken. Piss and moan that nutsuckers are not the bastion of free speech, cuz that is what is on the cart. What rules did any of the newscorps break that Il Douchebag is denying them access?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/7/2017 8:38:59 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline 		FR

Attempt to intimidate the media (check)
Replace facts with propaganda (check)
Incite fear as excuse for overreach (check)
Demonize a whole religion as the enemy (check)
Seek to undermine judicial independence (check)
And now: Silence the opposition (check)

Just another stop on the road to authoritarianism.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 5:22:21 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/318422-senate-votes-to-silence-warren-after-sessions-speech

Feel free to add your own examples of their constant pantshitting hipocracy and trampling of the constitution.

Yeah, bitch and moan. She broke a Senate rule.

K.



its disturbingly fascinating that he equates being censured because of a violation of operating rules as akin to "congress passing a law prohibiting..."

but then, this is the same person who thinks rioting is "free speech" too.

and that despite his incessant attacking of others for using blogs, or criticizing blogs as sources, he continues to use them.

lastly, im pretty sure too ive seen him pick on others because of spelling errors. I was wondering for a moment if we were talking about Hippocrates as opposed to hypocrisy.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 5:43:40 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline


which is another way of saying "bs" on every one of your lines.

or where were you for the last 8 yrs??

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 2/8/2017 5:47:26 AM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 5:50:01 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		It is typical of dogshit44 to not know what the rule is, and that she did not violate it, she was denied free speech by the nutsuckers for reading a letter written by Coretta Scott King.

And as I pointed out, no action was taken against the nutsucker Raphael Cruz for a direct attack on Sen. Franken.

“Senator Franken engaged you in a discussion that I think was intended to undermine your character and integrity. And in particular, Senator Franken suggested that you had somehow misrepresented your record,” Sen. Cruz said. “It is unfortunate to see members of this body impugn the integrity of a fellow senator with whom we’ve served with for years. It is particular unfortunate when that attack is not backed up by the facts.”

But of course it was backed up by a litany of facts, by the principles involved. And Raphael 'closet' Cruz was not censured.

Suck a wad of cowpiss you felchgobbling cockgargler. Lock up the constitution violating, senate rules violating partisan hack nutsuckers.

Cockgargle the qualitative difference here for me dogshit44, you ignorant fuckwhistle. Go suck the snake tears out of Trumps ass.







< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/8/2017 5:53:04 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 5:51:59 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Apparently, according to the GOP leader, reading the letter from Martin Luther King’s widow was, in effect, too mean. McConnell pointed to Rule XIX, which says senators cannot “directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another senator or to other senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a senator.”

In other words, Coretta Scott King’s concerns about Sessions’ record 30 years ago might hurt Sessions’ feelings, so, in the interest of maintaining decorum in the chamber, Republicans felt compelled to shut Warren down. Of all the things McConnell could’ve chosen to pounce on, he chose concerns about Sessions, race, and civil rights from MLK’s widow.

Of course, the Streisand Effect immediately kicked in, and by silencing the Democratic senator, Republicans inadvertently raised her profile and brought more attention to the remarks she intended to make.

Indeed, Warren ultimately read the King letter anyway, not from the Senate floor, but from a Senate hallway where it was streamed online – for an audience of nearly 50,000 people.

Thats what you call a backfire


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 6:04:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/news/politics/2017/01/10/ted-cruz-tears-al-franken-sessions-confirmation-hearing/

Lock up the nutsuckers. We have paid enough for their continuous violations of the constitution, Senate Rules, and Political Assassinations.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 6:13:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		..

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/8/2017 6:28:28 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 6:16:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

http://www.wweek.com/news/2017/02/07/jeff-merkley-defies-senate-republican-leader-by-reading-coretta-scott-kings-words-on-the-floor-of-congress/


LOL. Nutsucker political assassination revealed!!!! You can actually see the nutsuckers tongues going in and out lapping it like little kitties, licking that Putinjizz out of Il Douchesters ass

indefensible, even for Felchgobbler Gobbles, and dogshi44, will they toiletlick? or will they slink away from their felchgobbling?


Oh, look Sen. Udall reading that letter right now....

And how about you Kirata?


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 7:36:01 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline 		FR

FACTCHECK: When the Republican-controlled Senate says Elizabeth Warren "impugned Jeff Sessions' character," what they mean is she "accurately described Jeff Sessions."

ANDY BOROWITZ


_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 7:45:14 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11337
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

FACTCHECK: When the Republican-controlled Senate says Elizabeth Warren "impugned Jeff Sessions' character," what they mean is she "accurately described Jeff Sessions."

ANDY BOROWITZ



Good thing your Nazi alt left "fact checkers" who riot and assault people for attending speeches they don't like, block freeways and commit arson lost the election

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 9:26:54 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Thats alt-right nutsuckers doing that OKeefe is giving nutsuckers a 2500 welfare check to do it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 10:28:52 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Thats alt-right nutsuckers doing that OKeefe is giving nutsuckers a 2500 welfare check to do it.
Got proof of that? Legal opinion, other than your own, that the Republicans violated the Constitution by shutting down Warrens?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 10:49:13 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		http://www.inquisitr.com/3872373/trump-inauguration-sting-operation-conservative-group-caught-trying-to-pay-liberals-to-riot/

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 11:21:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Thats alt-right nutsuckers doing that OKeefe is giving nutsuckers a 2500 welfare check to do it.
Got proof of that? Legal opinion, other than your own, that the Republicans violated the Constitution by shutting down Warrens?


You cant read? Layed out for you right here on this thread.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> On nutsuckers and free speech Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.111