Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: On nutsuckers and free speech


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: On nutsuckers and free speech Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 11:36:49 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11334
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

http://www.inquisitr.com/3872373/trump-inauguration-sting-operation-conservative-group-caught-trying-to-pay-liberals-to-riot/


Fake news - your article cites this Huffpo article

Here the author of the Huffpo article Ryann Grimm praises Project Veritas and James O'Keefe as doing "good work" in this case

"Lives could be saved"

http://projectveritas.com/2017/01/18/james-okeefe-on-hannity-with-huffington-post-writer-ryan-grim/

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 11:44:11 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		hahahahhahahahaahah project veritas
yes yes its alllllllll lefties are paid protestors, even the dipshit in charge is pulling okeefe out of his hole, so alternative facts drool./
he asked for a link, I gave one....as I said before, whether YOU believe anything is true, false, or plain lying bullshit, is immaterial.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/8/2017 12:02:40 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline 		Yep, same old repub hypocrisy.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/9/2017 3:22:31 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Thats alt-right nutsuckers doing that OKeefe is giving nutsuckers a 2500 welfare check to do it.
Got proof of that? Legal opinion, other than your own, that the Republicans violated the Constitution by shutting down Warrens?


You cant read? Layed out for you right here on this thread.

The sting operation is proof of what, exactly? That some shit for brains jerk tried to pay people to riot? Where's the proof that the ones rioting at Berkley or at any other snowflake riot are actually paid by anybody, liberal or conservative?

As for your claim, you've yet to provide proof...other than your opinion...that shutting Warrens down was unconstitutional.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/9/2017 5:07:20 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		congress shall make no law...............pencil it out

That some shit for brains jerk paying people to riot is a nutsucker, nutsuckers are rioting.

How can nutsuckers be nazis and communists simultaneously sucking PutinJizz and HitlerJizz?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/college-republicans-sorry-hitler-valentines-card

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 4:25:21 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
As for your claim, you've yet to provide proof...other than your opinion...that shutting Warrens down was unconstitutional.


he cant---as indicated by his post above mine in reply to you, he's impotent and incompetent.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 4:55:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		you have to forgive this guy that follows me around and right on que felchgobbles retarded shit. He is mad because it has been pointed out that his soft on for PutinJizz is further deteriorating his syphilitic brain. And that aint good. He is an indolent felchgobbler, a drain on society, useless, without any prospect whatsoever, shunned, a voracious parrot for nutsucker propaganda, untutored, inept, in sum, a waste of American oxygen.

Poor dogshit44, no pot to piss in, no window to throw it out of, and unable to cogitate as evidenced by his fuckheaded incoherence without a long meaningless retarded quote from townhall.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/10/2017 4:56:49 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 6:52:58 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11334
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
As for your claim, you've yet to provide proof...other than your opinion...that shutting Warrens down was unconstitutional.


he cant---as indicated by his post above mine in reply to you, he's impotent and incompetent.


I can't believe nutsucker-felchgobbler man created a thread with this many replies

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 9:07:36 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
As for your claim, you've yet to provide proof...other than your opinion...that shutting Warrens down was unconstitutional.


he cant---as indicated by his post above mine in reply to you, he's impotent and incompetent.


I can't believe nutsucker-felchgobbler man created a thread with this many replies

OH, Felchgobbler Gobbles, you poor fucking retarded sap. It must be a great deal of stress on you to be a retarded felchgobbling nutsucker living in your mothers basement with your sock and your hand lotion. The fact you named it 'the compound' is still kinda cute though.

You've been banging on your pots again, haven't you? I've told you... if you keep on doing it, you won't have any pots left.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 9:42:50 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		mnottertail original post I thought for the pantsbuster, or is it filibuster, they needed the 60%, or was it two thirds, before they could declare her a mad waffling bint. And that this should not be included in the simple circus majority...so i dont understand that bit. I've obviously missed something somewhere?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 9:54:25 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

mnottertail original post I thought for the pantsbuster, or is it filibuster, they needed the 60%, or was it two thirds, before they could declare her a mad waffling bint. And that this should not be included in the simple circus majority...so i dont understand that bit. I've obviously missed something somewhere?

that is the rule that I believe is still at simple majority from 2013. I have no information anywhere I can find that it was changed back.

In any case, quick change. Nuclear option my ass, it has always been an illegal act since Nixon first proclaimed it could be done. Obviously not much of a lawyer that one.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 10:09:01 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		I agree.....

The filibuster thingie I was unaware it could be changed could look again On November 21, 2013, the Senate voted, in a 52 to 48 vote, to require only a majority vote to end a filibuster of all executive and judicial nominees, excluding Supreme Court nominees, rather than the 3/5 of votes previously required. A 3/5 supermajority is still required to end filibusters on legislation and Supreme Court nominees https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster#Senate - this is why I am getting confused with what going on across there.

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 2/10/2017 10:12:53 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 10:46:10 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Oh, ok, so they will vote on the rule being extended to SCOTUS nominees, a much smaller nuclear device than big boy. And the theater is over.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/10/2017 11:05:32 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		Hillbilly is in so they must have already did that but I couldn't find anything anwhere saying they had extended it to exclude Supreme Court nominees - this was the same senate who rejected Obama's nominee as it was to close to the end of his presidency for "senate" to decide - 10 months.

In February 2016, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia died. The following month, President Barack Obama nominated D.C. Circuit Judge Merrick Garland to replace Scalia. However, the Senate was controlled by the Republican Party, which argued that the next president should instead appoint Scalia's successor.[45] Senate Republicans refused to hold hearings on Garland, and Garland's nomination remained before the Senate longer than any other Supreme Court nomination.[46] Garland's nomination expired with the end of the 114th United States Congress.[47]

WTF is going on?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/11/2017 12:12:54 AM   
LadyDemura


Posts: 141
Joined: 2/12/2016
Status: offline 		What happened is the Republicans routinely use these type of tactics and the Democrats are reluctant to....

While this pick was totally stolen from Obama, there's no real guarantee Gorsuch will end up being the Scalia replacement the Republicans hope he will be...once they get on the Supreme Court they can and often do have a mind of their own...

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/11/2017 12:37:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Kirata
ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/318422-senate-votes-to-silence-warren-after-sessions-speech

Feel free to add your own examples of their constant pantshitting hipocracy and trampling of the constitution.


Yeah, bitch and moan. She broke a Senate rule.

Well he got a chance to say shut up and sit down bitch to an old woman but when the men stood up and read the letter in total he seems to have run out of balls...so much for senate rules and the courage (or lack there of) of ones convictions?
Was the punk afraid that bernie might bitch slap him into the middle of next week or did he just want to tell a girl to shut up and sit down.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/11/2017 12:38:57 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: LadyDemura

What happened is the Republicans routinely use these type of tactics and the Democrats are reluctant to....

While this pick was totally stolen from Obama, there's no real guarantee Gorsuch will end up being the Scalia replacement the Republicans hope he will be...once they get on the Supreme Court they can and often do have a mind of their own...


Earl warren comes to mind.

(in reply to LadyDemura)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/11/2017 12:49:27 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11334
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyDemura

What happened is the Republicans routinely use these type of tactics and the Democrats are reluctant to....

While this pick was totally stolen from Obama, there's no real guarantee Gorsuch will end up being the Scalia replacement the Republicans hope he will be...once they get on the Supreme Court they can and often do have a mind of their own...


"Stolen" from the Dems?

Hysterical much?

The seat (which had been held by Samual Alito, a Republican pick) belongs to the people, not the Dems. Don't forget that Chuck Schumer vowed to keep President Bush from getting a SC confirmation in the last year and a half of his second term

So you could say that the Republicans are simply following yet another Dem precedent

Another way to look at it was, the Republicans deferred to the American voters to decide who got to pick Alito's replacement, and they chose Donald Trump.

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to LadyDemura)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/11/2017 1:25:44 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyDemura

What happened is the Republicans routinely use these type of tactics and the Democrats are reluctant to....

While this pick was totally stolen from Obama, there's no real guarantee Gorsuch will end up being the Scalia replacement the Republicans hope he will be...once they get on the Supreme Court they can and often do have a mind of their own...


"Stolen" from the Dems?

Hysterical much?

The seat (which had been held by Samual Alito, a Republican pick) belongs to the people, not the Dems. Don't forget that Chuck Schumer vowed to keep President Bush from getting a SC confirmation in the last year and a half of his second term

So you could say that the Republicans are simply following yet another Dem precedent

Another way to look at it was, the Republicans deferred to the American voters to decide who got to pick Alito's replacement, and they chose Donald Trump.

Several things Felchgobbler Gobbles you fucking retard. Nothing stolen by Dems, never said, and not contemplated. Secondly, Samuel Fucking Alito aint going to be sharing his seat on the Supreme Court with anyone you fuckhead. I keep repeating this, and you keep felching PutinJizz. Samuel Alito is very much alive and sits on the Supreme Court of the United States. I know you have never heard of these things, being in the compound, your mothers basement with your sock and hand lotion, but no sense having OKeefe paid nutsuckers kill Alito yet, he isnt even gonna get a line of text anywhere else except by ignorant cockgarglers like you.

You fucking stupid nutsucker retards are why we cant have nice things. Go stick a pitchfork up your ass and save America the oxygen.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: On nutsuckers and free speech - 2/11/2017 2:02:58 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


The sting operation is proof of what, exactly?


Perhaps a grown up might be able to help you with the big words?


That some shit for brains jerk tried to pay people to riot?


Was he just any "shit for brains jerk" or was he some politically oriented shit for brains jerk?


Where's the proof that the ones rioting at Berkley or at any other snowflake riot are actually paid by anybody, liberal or conservative?


Till you show proof to the contrary the momemtum is against that thought.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: On nutsuckers and free speech Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078