RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president

RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:14:19 PM)
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers The top 3rd would have him at least no lower than the top 13 out of 41. But since we've had 44 as I understand Trump is 45th. My bad there have been 43 different men be president not counting trump since he just started. Yes he is number 45 but grover the child molester was president twice but not consecutively so he is usually counted twice. He was a portly gent but not that portly

thompsonx -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:21:23 PM)
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers I mean shit, I've read where Stalin got 1000's of his enemies...jobs. They didn't pay and eventually killed them and pretty quickly too but I don't want to be too picky. Stalin snuffed a lot of people that he felt were a threat to the bolshivik revolution. However I have never seen any creditable evidence he agrandised himself while he was in power. Churchill, in his tome wwII, mentions stalin's spartan lifestyle in dress and accomodations.

BoscoX -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:22:18 PM)
FR The reason these great scholarly historians ranked Obama so high, was that he turned the entire federal government (and most state governments) over to the Republicans Including the Supreme Court, for many years to come

MrRodgers -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:23:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: MrRodgers The top 3rd would have him at least no lower than the top 13 out of 41. But since we've had 44 as I understand Trump is 45th. My bad there have been 43 different men be president not counting trump since he just started. Yes he is number 45 but grover the child molester was president twice but not consecutively so he is usually counted twice. He was a portly gent but not that portly You do make me have fun here. It wasn't your bad at all, it was HillWilliam who needs a refresher course. No. 12 IS in the top 1/3 and mathematically...has no choice out of 43 since we can't consider him or Trump. How about we put this to bed, any pres. in the top 14.33333333+++++...is in the top 1/3.

MrRodgers -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:38:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX FR The reason these great scholarly historians ranked Obama so high, was that he turned the entire federal government (and most state governments) over to the Republicans Including the Supreme Court, for many years to come He did no such thing. Propaganda and the senate did those things and in that order. Plus hasn't the right been complaining for over 40 and maybe 50 or more years that the federal bureaucracy is all leftists. Plus one would have to ask why W is ranked so low when he had all repub govt. ? I mean, if that's your criteria.

MrRodgers -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:41:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: MrRodgers I mean shit, I've read where Stalin got 1000's of his enemies...jobs. They didn't pay and eventually killed them and pretty quickly too but I don't want to be too picky. Stalin snuffed a lot of people that he felt were a threat to the bolshivik revolution. However I have never seen any creditable evidence he agrandised himself while he was in power. Churchill, in his tome wwII, mentions stalin's spartan lifestyle in dress and accomodations. Oh I was being facetious. Stalin got a few 1000 enemies jobs in labor camps and worked them to death not for his personal benefit.

thompsonx -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 6:55:28 PM)
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers ORIGINAL: thompsonx I mean shit, I've read where Stalin got 1000's of his enemies...jobs. They didn't pay and eventually killed them and pretty quickly too but I don't want to be too picky. Stalin snuffed a lot of people that he felt were a threat to the bolshivik revolution. However I have never seen any creditable evidence he agrandised himself while he was in power. Churchill, in his tome wwII, mentions stalin's spartan lifestyle in dress and accomodations. Oh I was being facetious. Stalin got a few 1000 enemies jobs in labor camps and worked them to death not for his personal benefit. If you were stalin what would you have done with the aristocracy and their enforcers(kulaks) who were sworn to return the monarchy at the point of a gun? Or the million or so nazi supermen (pow)who sought to exterminate the subhuman russians? I am of the opinion that they got pretty much what they sought to give. No skin off off my ass and a few million fewer assholes breathing up my air.

BoscoX -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 7:07:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX FR The reason these great scholarly historians ranked Obama so high, was that he turned the entire federal government (and most state governments) over to the Republicans Including the Supreme Court, for many years to come He did no such thing. Propaganda and the senate did those things and in that order. Plus hasn't the right been complaining for over 40 and maybe 50 or more years that the federal bureaucracy is all leftists. Plus one would have to ask why W is ranked so low when he had all repub govt. ? I mean, if that's your criteria. If leftists were capable of humor, they would be conservatives.

mnottertail -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 7:10:01 PM)
if there were conservatives, they would laugh at you felchgobbling retards just like the leftists do

LTE -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 7:22:07 PM)
Who are "historians"? Let me guess...

BamaD -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/18/2017 8:38:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LTE Who are "historians"? Let me guess... Two points: 1 You can't judge a president 30 days after he left office. 2 How many of these historians have ever voted for a Republican?

MrRodgers -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 1:56:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam ORIGINAL: thompsonx Actually, 12 out of 36 would put him in the top third. There have been 43 presidents 43/3=14.3 is one third of 43...obama=12. Twelve is between 1 and 14.3. 43/4=10..75 is one fourth of 43...obama =12. Twelve is not between 1 and 10.75. Jesus, you are phoquing innumerate. [8D] We now know why you were a p.e. teacher. I know this wasn't directed at me but I used 44 because...well...why not, what the fuck. There have been 44 administrations, so.....? I wonder if that could ever happen again ? same MF elected to two non-consecutive terms..... About the same chance as a non-partisan OP here.

WhoreMods -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 4:33:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX FR The reason these great scholarly historians ranked Obama so high, was that he turned the entire federal government (and most state governments) over to the Republicans Including the Supreme Court, for many years to come He did no such thing. Propaganda and the senate did those things and in that order. Plus hasn't the right been complaining for over 40 and maybe 50 or more years that the federal bureaucracy is all leftists. Plus one would have to ask why W is ranked so low when he had all repub govt. ? I mean, if that's your criteria. If leftists were capable of humor, they would be conservatives. Don't make me laugh: the best humourist the right can manage at the moment is PJ O'Rourke, and it's twenty odd years since he managed anything vaguely funny.

thompsonx -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 4:59:31 AM)
ORIGINAL: LTE Who are "historians"? Let me guess... Guessing is what people who are too lazy to read do.

mnottertail -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 5:09:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: LTE Who are "historians"? Let me guess... Two points: 1 You can't judge a president 30 days after he left office. 2 How many of these historians have ever voted for a Republican? 1. You were judging Obama before he took office. 2, St Wrinklemeat is on the list, so I assume at least half of them.

bounty44 -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 5:12:19 AM)
its a rare "historian" who is not working outside of academia, which we already know is left learning---and the humanities all the more so.

mnottertail -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 5:17:25 AM)
It is rare for a nutsucker to have the intelligence to be employed at more than mcdonalds. Or in some government welfare scheme. Way of the world. I thought it was stupid they had the retard St. Wrinklemeat on the list, since so obviously to nutsuckers there were no nutsuckers on the vote.

heavyblinker -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 5:28:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail 1. You were judging Obama before he took office. Hahahahahahahaha.

heavyblinker -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 5:30:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 its a rare "historian" who is not working outside of academia, which we already know is left learning---and the humanities all the more so. I knew this comment would appear, and was pretty sure it was going to be either you or Bosco who made it.

bounty44 -> RE: Historians rank Obama 12th best president (2/19/2017 5:51:50 AM)
Wrinkleme. Wrinkleme. Way of the intelligence to nutsuckers on there for a nutsuckers on than mcdonalds. Or in some government was stupid they had the vote. Wrinkleme. Way of thought is rare to be employed at more schemeat on they have there for a nutsucker to nutsuckers on the were were for a nutsuckers on the retard St. Way of there for a nutsucker to nutsuckers than mcdonalds. Or in so obviously to have thought is rare there so obviously to be employed at more for a nutsucker to be employed at on.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625