RE: Milo Uninvited

RE: Milo Uninvited (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/20/2017 10:47:22 PM)
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I need to know for my shoes??? Wellies or hobnail slingbacks Make up your mind , My vote is for the hobnail slingbacks, a smile and nothing else.

dcnovice -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 5:24:58 AM)
FR http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2017/02/20/breitbart-employees-demand-milo-yiannopoulos-fired/

tweakabelle -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 5:51:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice FR http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2017/02/20/breitbart-employees-demand-milo-yiannopoulos-fired/ Shush now dcnovice. [:D] News such this could have serious and damaging effects on poor RM's so-fragile psyche. We all know of the deep seated attraction and love that characterises the relationship between those two hot blooded young blades, Milo Y and RM. Heaven knows, RM is in a bad enough way as it is. This could be the last thing he needs.

WhoreMods -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 5:54:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I need to know for my shoes??? Wellies or hobnail slingbacks Make up your mind , My vote is for the hobnail slingbacks, a smile and nothing else. She can't do that, sport: that's what Milo will be wearing.

Awareness -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 7:38:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why dont you look at the video or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur... or not have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent. Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys. That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern.

mnottertail -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 7:43:33 AM)
Then why are the nutsuckers violating his 1st amendment rights? His pedophilia is a nutsucker 'family value'.

tweakabelle -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 7:48:08 AM)
Now that Milo has lost his book deal, and had his conference invitation withdrawn ( Could it happen to a nicer, more deserving guy?) is it time to have a look at all those who enabled this monster? And should we be asking those who find Milo's defence of paedophilia a bridge too far, where were you and why were you silent when he was inciting race hate, trans hate and stoking the flames of misogyny? Isn't pandering to those who incite hate in these areas also objectionable? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-enablers-contempt-alt-right-bigotry Every cloud has a silver lining they say. Hopefully Milo, upon finding himself sinking to those deepest depths of obscurity and pariahdom that he so richly deserves, he will re-discover and be re-united with the minute remains of his shredded and long-ago-abandoned ethics

MrRodgers -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:05:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why dont you look at the video or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur... or not have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent. Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys. That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern. So CPAC and National Review are liars ?

BoscoX -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:06:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Now that Milo has lost his book deal, and had his conference invitation withdrawn ( Could it happen to a nicer, more deserving guy?) is it time to have a look at all those who enabled this monster? And should we be asking those who find Milo's defence of paedophilia a bridge too far, where were you and why were you silent when he was inciting race hate, trans hate and stoking the flames of misogyny? Isn't pandering to those who incite hate in these areas also objectionable? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-enablers-contempt-alt-right-bigotry Every cloud has a silver lining they say. Hopefully Milo, upon finding himself sinking to those deepest depths of obscurity and pariahdom that he so richly deserves, he will re-discover and be re-united with the minute remains of his shredded and long-ago-abandoned ethics While tweaker organizes her Nazi brown shirt brigade... Salon Removes PRO-PEDOPHILIA Articles Written By Todd Nickerson From Its Website http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/salon-removes-pro-pedophilia-articles-written-todd-nickerson-website/ As I posted before - on the bright side for Milo, at least he will be welcomed at Berkley now

WhoreMods -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:07:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why dont you look at the video or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur... or not have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent. Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys. That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern. So CPAC and National Review are liars ? Everybody who disagrees with him about anything is a liar. If they weren't a liar, they'd agree with him.

Greta75 -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:13:38 AM)
FR The Right did the RIGHT thing by calling Milo out for his potential pedophilia encouragement comment. And taking action to make a strong stand that any potential encouragement of pedophilia is not acceptable. Although, I highly doubt Milo was encouraging pedophilia. But simply sharing some experiences of how some young boys found out they were gay by dabbling with older men. But I can see how his comments could encourage Pedophilia, although I do not believe that was his intention, to promote pedophilia as an acceptable practice. I agree with Bosco that IF this was the Left. They wouldn't have done shit. Especially if it was a celebrity of the Left.

Lucylastic -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:14:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic why dont you look at the video or you could link me to his addressing whatever slur... or not have a colouring book and some glitter pens....they smell of butthurt An out of context quote which Milo has already adequately explained? One of the ongoing intellectual manoeuvres which leftists like yourself engage in is the deliberate misinterpretation of both your enemies and your allies. So, while Milo has already clearly explained this in the context of a late teen discovering his sexuality, the wilful misrepresentation of his statements by leftists is yet another avenue of dishonest attack upon an ideological opponent. Milo jokes a lot and deliberately triggers the Left. Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty knows exactly what he's talking about. I watched Milo's entire discussion with Joe Rogan when it came out. At no time was he advocating padeophilia. Anyone who claims he is, is a liar. Pure and simple. And every single news organisation which reports that he's advocating paedophilia is guilty of promoting fake news. This is why we now have a crisis of confidence in the media - because the media have turned their backs on the responsibility which is expected of them as a consequence of the protections which the fourth estate enjoys. That you happen to be a liar is no surprise. To anyone. That large-scale media organisations are liars - something highlighted during the Sanders campaign - is grave cause for concern. You will have to link it...I havent seen it... Teen is from 13-19...14 isnt late teen, so he wasnt a late teen, that he was molested in his own words, that he enjoyed it, isnt the problem. I was very sexually aware from age 7. I was sucking cock at 14. I was very sexually active as a teen. I get that, totally. It doesnt mean that the catholic priest who "taught" him how to suck cock wasnt against the law, That doesnt mean that what he "enjoyed" wasnt pedophilia. That doesnt mean that any other teen would feel the same and it doesnt meant that its perfectly fine for any other teen. That is the problem. Where did I lie??? put it up PS< CPAC is not a liberal, or progressive or leftist group. It was a con group that released the video, not the left. Breitbart isnt liberal

mnottertail -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:15:56 AM)
LOL, the nutsuckers want him to go to colleges and preach pedophilia to our youth, but cower when they are shown in the garish light of day as pedophiles themselves, and then violate his 1st amendment rights. Felchgobbler Gobbles was felching the pedophile bigly, YUGELY, just the other day.

BoscoX -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:43:13 AM)
quote: Rumblings: Liberals Had Huge Scorched Earth Plan to Take Down Milo — #NeverTrumpers May Have Paid for Research http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/rumblings-liberals-huge-scorched-earth-plan-take-milo-nevertrumpers-may-paid-research/

Awareness -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:43:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic You will have to link it...I havent seen it... You haven't seen it because you're not interested in facts, you're interested in censorship, slurs and smearing someone's character. Milo's statement in response can be seen on his Facebook page. You're quite capable of looking that up for yourself - I refuse to spoon-feed you and encourage your intellectual laziness. quote: Teen is from 13-19...14 isnt late teen, so he wasnt a late teen, that he was molested in his own words, that he enjoyed it, isnt the problem. I was very sexually aware from age 7. I was sucking cock at 14. I was very sexually active as a teen. I get that, totally. It doesnt mean that the catholic priest who "taught" him how to suck cock wasnt against the law, That doesnt mean that what he "enjoyed" wasnt pedophilia. That doesnt mean that any other teen would feel the same and it doesnt meant that its perfectly fine for any other teen. That is the problem. Where did I lie??? put it up Milo's jokes about his own experience are entirely his own prerogative. He has that right - like any other survivor of sexual abuse. Although, given that he's male, I'm sure you'll find a way to vilify him anyway. After all, in your world, women who are victims of sexual abuse are appparently justified in doing all sorts of things - including lying about who the perpetrator was. quote: PS< CPAC is not a liberal, or progressive or leftist group. It was a con group that released the video, not the left. Breitbart isnt liberal The video has been up on Youtube for over 6 months. Nobody "released" the video, it was publicly available. You are lazy, uninformed and stupid.

Lucylastic -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 8:56:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic You will have to link it...I havent seen it... You haven't seen it because you're not interested in facts, you're interested in censorship, slurs and smearing someone's character. Milo's statement in response can be seen on his Facebook page. You're quite capable of looking that up for yourself - I refuse to spoon-feed you and encourage your intellectual laziness. quote: Teen is from 13-19...14 isnt late teen, so he wasnt a late teen, that he was molested in his own words, that he enjoyed it, isnt the problem. I was very sexually aware from age 7. I was sucking cock at 14. I was very sexually active as a teen. I get that, totally. It doesnt mean that the catholic priest who "taught" him how to suck cock wasnt against the law, That doesnt mean that what he "enjoyed" wasnt pedophilia. That doesnt mean that any other teen would feel the same and it doesnt meant that its perfectly fine for any other teen. That is the problem. Where did I lie??? put it up Milo's jokes about his own experience are entirely his own prerogative. He has that right - like any other survivor of sexual abuse. Although, given that he's male, I'm sure you'll find a way to vilify him anyway. After all, in your world, women who are victims of sexual abuse are appparently justified in doing all sorts of things - including lying about who the perpetrator was. quote: PS< CPAC is not a liberal, or progressive or leftist group. It was a con group that released the video, not the left. Breitbart isnt liberal The video has been up on Youtube for over 6 months. Nobody "released" the video, it was publicly available. You are lazy, uninformed and stupid. oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it... just open your mouth an spew your bullshit. No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations. Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant. but a typical dickhole response I expect from you.

Awareness -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 9:01:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it... No. Like most Leftists, you like to have your opinions spoon-fed to you. You're incapable of thinking for yourself. It's time for you to start. quote: just open your mouth an spew your bullshit. No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations. Your experience is irrelevant. You're vilifying a man for the crime of joking about his own sexual abuse. You hate men and you're an abuser. It's very clear. quote: Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant. but a typical dickhole response I expect from you. I've characterised you correctly and appropriately. You simply lack the intelligence, intellectual honesty and perception necessary to engage in a debate about any topic which isn't Coronation Street.

Lucylastic -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 9:32:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it... No. Like most Leftists, you like to have your opinions spoon-fed to you. You're incapable of thinking for yourself. It's time for you to start. quote: just open your mouth an spew your bullshit. No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations. Your experience is irrelevant. You're vilifying a man for the crime of joking about his own sexual abuse. You hate men and you're an abuser. It's very clear. quote: Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant. but a typical dickhole response I expect from you. I've characterised you correctly and appropriately. You simply lack the intelligence, intellectual honesty and perception necessary to engage in a debate about any topic which isn't Coronation Street. Like most of the dumbarse dipshits here you wont link to anything and believe that you are right. And get ridiculous when you arent. you got your talking point from facebook...but im the one that is being spoon fed? lolololololol My experience isnt irrelevant sorry and all that, But I bet I have worked with more male victims of sexual abuse in person than you ever will reading online. Im not vilifying him for his abuse, please show me where I did that? you talk absolute slime again. Im so not qualified to talk about coronaation street, I havent seen it in 35 years. However I was in court with my abused male "friend" less than ten years ago. so you can go fuck yourself. I most certainly do not hate men, only misogynist anal flaps like yourself.

Awareness -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 9:38:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic oh good god, I knew you simply wouldnt link it... No. Like most Leftists, you like to have your opinions spoon-fed to you. You're incapable of thinking for yourself. It's time for you to start. quote: just open your mouth an spew your bullshit. No, Ive actually worked with more than a few straight AND gay men and their abuse, One, all the way up to supreme court of canada, so you can just fuck off with your accusations. Your experience is irrelevant. You're vilifying a man for the crime of joking about his own sexual abuse. You hate men and you're an abuser. It's very clear. quote: Your attempts to villify me like that is beyond pathetic, and ignorant. but a typical dickhole response I expect from you. I've characterised you correctly and appropriately. You simply lack the intelligence, intellectual honesty and perception necessary to engage in a debate about any topic which isn't Coronation Street. Like most of the dumbarse dipshits here you wont link to anything and believe that you are right. And get ridiculous when you arent. you got your talking point from facebook...but im the one that is being spoon fed? lolololololol No, you fucking moron, I got the STATEMENT from the Facebook profile of the very guy you're fucking vilifying, you thick-as-pig-shit bint. Christ, how the fuck do you live with a mind that incompetent? quote: My experience isnt irrelevant sorry and all that, But I bet I have worked with more male victims of sexual abuse in person than you ever will reading online. Im not vilifying him for his abuse, please show me where I did that? you talk absolute slime again. He joked about his abuse, you claim his joke advocates paedophilia. You're engaging in a collective vilification of a political opponent by promoting a lie. quote: Im so not qualified to talk about coronaation street, I havent seen it in 35 years. Suuuuuure you haven't. drily Because someone with your esteemed character is clearly above petty gossip. quote: However I was in court with my abused male "friend" less than ten years ago. so you can go fuck yourself. I most certainly do not hate men, only misogynist anal flaps like yourself. "I'm a good person because I went to court with someone who suffered!!!! I'm amazing!" You're a fucking victim-hood leech engaging in self-aggrandising self-promotion on the back of people who've actually suffered. You are fucking disgusting.

tweakabelle -> RE: Milo Uninvited (2/21/2017 9:48:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Now that Milo has lost his book deal, and had his conference invitation withdrawn ( Could it happen to a nicer, more deserving guy?) is it time to have a look at all those who enabled this monster? And should we be asking those who find Milo's defence of paedophilia a bridge too far, where were you and why were you silent when he was inciting race hate, trans hate and stoking the flames of misogyny? Isn't pandering to those who incite hate in these areas also objectionable? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/21/milo-yiannopoulos-enablers-contempt-alt-right-bigotry Every cloud has a silver lining they say. Hopefully Milo, upon finding himself sinking to those deepest depths of obscurity and pariahdom that he so richly deserves, he will re-discover and be re-united with the minute remains of his shredded and long-ago-abandoned ethics While tweaker organizes her Nazi brown shirt brigade... Salon Removes PRO-PEDOPHILIA Articles Written By Todd Nickerson From Its Website http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/02/salon-removes-pro-pedophilia-articles-written-todd-nickerson-website/ As I posted before - on the bright side for Milo, at least he will be welcomed at Berkley now What has your post got to do with either (i) this thread or (ii) my post? As far as I can tell the answer is nothing in both cases. Milo's current predicament has absolutely nothing to do with whatever the content of Salon magazine or its website is. Nor does Salon's content have any bearing on anything I put in my post. Your argument seems to be one of the more childish arguments available - Salon did X action, therefore all leftists do X action, therefore RWNJs like me can do Y action. So you are just raving away as usual. No relevance, no evidence relating to the topic, no logical connections, not even an organised sensible sentence/argument structure - just the incoherent babbling of an hysterical looney RWNJ who has long ago lost the plot. You need professional help aqap. Nurse! Triple his meds!

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875