MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
I thought this is why Bush II started the whole thing by allowing the reduction of Iraq into a sectarian war and deliberately allowing al-Zarqawi to stay alive long enough to declare himself caliphate of ISIS.
The neocons wanted this and they got this...Muslim killing Muslim and anybody else that gets in the way. In that they are the same race...racism doesn't follow.
The usual leftist drooler stupidity
Muslims have been attacking Sikhs in Pakistan for 500 years because of George Bush
Sometimes you seem to deliberately get off track. From YOUR OP:
Pakistan is trying to stop Muslims from leaving a Muslim country and going to a Muslim country.
That's NOT racist and has nothing whatever to do with Sikhs or racism.
As I wrote, the neocons now have what they wanted all along.
I wasn't replying to my OP, idiot. I was replying to your tired, worn-out talking point. And if you had read the OP you would see that your Muslim friends slaughtered 100 Sikhs, that was a fundamental component to the article I posted
Tough, I was and whether you shift now from your OP or not, your OP and your comment referred to and neither the border crossing or Muslim vs Muslim is...racist.
Plus this doesn't prevent Sikhs from entering or Muslim attacks on them. So not surprisingly, there is no parallel here with what Trump did.
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great
Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith
|
RE: Is it "racist" for Pakistan to protect it... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread