Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his information


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his information Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 12:00:21 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline



Wow! So much to deal with, here. First, how condescending does this paragraph sound:

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox

No, I don't keep trying to convince people science is real. I look at that and see people who argue with scientists and academics arrogantly and think, you are the heirs of Rush Limbaugh. That level of denial is not worth trying to fix.



? Not even worth the effort to try to save them? I wonder ... Are Syrian refugees "worth the effort of trying to 'fix'?" So ... where do you draw your line? is it just people who oppose your viewpoint or is it all people that need help?

Well, it is amazing how leftists are soooo in love with science until you ask a scientist (hard sciences; not the "soft" ones): "How many genders are there?" or, if you ask those proponents of the "overwhelming, 97% of scientists ..." where the list of all the climate scientists resides.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox

There isn't a preponderance of evidence that Muslims are all evil. There are no connection between these events. So posting them is an attempt to paint a negative impression of Muslims based on the actions of a few. That is Islamophobia. If I posted with the same kind of vigor about the awful things alleged Christians do, it would only serve to condemn Christianity, and would be manipulation on my part.



Preponderance of evidence? I have read the entire Qur'on (back in the 90s, before the rise of Al Qaeda/DAESH) and I have read it quite a few times, since then. While the Judeo-Christian Bible is full of explanations about why certain groups of people had to be killed (as an after-thought), the Qur'on extolls the virtues of killing the non-virtuous as an on-going endeavor and an easy ticket to "Heaven".

Would you say that anyone that reads "Mein Kampf" on a daily basis and idolizes Adolph Hitler might be a danger (especially a group of those someones)? I would. So, the Jihadis that read their blood-stained book are a danger, also.

You'll notice, please, that I use "Islamic jihadists" or "Jihadis". I have NEVER claimed that all Muslims are evil, but all those that are forced to "study" in Madrasses and are force-fed a literal interpretation of the Qur'on ARE a serious threat to the Western way of life (which includes that pluralism that leftists claim to champion).

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox

People on the right are not of one voice. There are many different levels of conservatism. Unfortunately, there's been years of abandoning the value of truth, to the point that people have been telling themselves war is peace, ignorance is strength, and freedom is slavery. It was a natural situation for Trump and his allies to exploit. So there's a large number of conservatives who now argue against the color of the sky for their own needs. However, as seen with the waving of the Russian Trump flags, the right is not a total consensus right now.



... and thank God for that. I am not and have never been a conservative or a supporter of President Trump. I am glad that there are "different levels of conservatism". I will give you a little glimpse into my mind: the most relevant thing I've heard in the last six months is a little video that can be found on PragerU.com by a gentleman of whom I am a fan, Dave Rubin. The video is called: "Why I Left the Left".

In case you don't know, Dave started out as part of "The Young Turds" and couldn't follow where Cenk was heading.

The phrase that Mr. Rubin has been using a lot, lately is: "I realized that defending my Liberal values has become a conservative position."

Another interesting take would be a youtube "series" called: "Leaving The Left", particularly the story that Penn Gillette tells.



Michael


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to GaryWilcox)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 12:11:00 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

fox watchers are hating on Wallace, Shep Smith and now Bob Beckel has said, "this president flat out lied"
they seem to be floating towards info wars and breitbart, gateway pundit and or rush and milo. Or the UK shit rags.






You are projecting again, idiot. Conservatives have never marched in lockstep like you alt left Stalinists


oh gawd, stalinists...you dont know the difference between, hitler, stalin, trotsky, lenin or marx..how the hell are you going to get the comprehend the entire "left"
So Hitler is part of the Left? I'm glad someone has come to their senses and admitted that Fascism is Leftist.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 12:14:41 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
and I am the one who struggles with the truth?


Yep. You twist everything to whatever you need it to be. Done entertaining you.




Gary... you should have quit while you were ahead.


he was ever ahead?? rather, he should have quit before he started.


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 12:19:50 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox
I pointed out that Breitbart and Jihad Watch are both considered to be a bad source of news from Wikipedia.org, where they have a legal right to challenge any libelous assertion.
It's extremely hard to successfully sue for libel in the USA, especially given the protection provided by the Communications Decency Act. Essentially, Wikipedia itself pretty much cannot be sued as the CDA insulates Wikipedia from litigation and the 1st amendment caps it off.

In short, your claim that Breitbart can effectively sue Wikipedia for a biased entry has been fact-checked and found false. You are a liar and a hypocrite.

Next!

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to GaryWilcox)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 12:29:30 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
and I am the one who struggles with the truth?


Yep. You twist everything to whatever you need it to be. Done entertaining you.




Gary... you should have quit while you were ahead.


he was ever ahead?? rather, he should have quit before he started.




Yes... looking back at it... you're right. (No pun intended. ;)

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 3:18:50 PM   
GaryWilcox


Posts: 95
Joined: 4/8/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
In short, your claim that Breitbart can effectively sue Wikipedia for a biased entry has been fact-checked and found false. You are a liar and a hypocrite.

Next!


I just did a simple search to discover all the times Wikipedia had been sued, successfully or unsuccessfully, and got results, oddly. As well, Fox News has a disclaimer on their page that says they disagree with Wikipedia's assessment.
There's a reason for that, of course.

That took seconds. You apparently didn't have seconds, but lied about searching, and then called me a liar.

Huh. Awareness, you are a dirty, dirty liar.


(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 4:37:42 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
In short, your claim that Breitbart can effectively sue Wikipedia for a biased entry has been fact-checked and found false. You are a liar and a hypocrite.

Next!


I just did a simple search to discover all the times Wikipedia had been sued, successfully or unsuccessfully, and got results, oddly. As well, Fox News has a disclaimer on their page that says they disagree with Wikipedia's assessment.
There's a reason for that, of course.

That took seconds. You apparently didn't have seconds, but lied about searching, and then called me a liar.

Huh. Awareness, you are a dirty, dirty liar.


And if you'd actually read any of that, you'd see that they prevailed in all cases related to content.

You are an idiot as well as a liar. And smacking your idiocy down is like shooting fish in a fucking barrel.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to GaryWilcox)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/24/2017 9:15:19 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Wow! So much to deal with, here. First, how condescending does this paragraph sound:

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox

There isn't a preponderance of evidence that Muslims are all evil. There are no connection between these events. So posting them is an attempt to paint a negative impression of Muslims based on the actions of a few. That is Islamophobia. If I posted with the same kind of vigor about the awful things alleged Christians do, it would only serve to condemn Christianity, and would be manipulation on my part.



Preponderance of evidence? I have read the entire Qur'on (back in the 90s, before the rise of Al Qaeda/DAESH) and I have read it quite a few times, since then. While the Judeo-Christian Bible is full of explanations about why certain groups of people had to be killed (as an after-thought), the Qur'on extolls the virtues of killing the non-virtuous as an on-going endeavor and an easy ticket to "Heaven".

Would you say that anyone that reads "Mein Kampf" on a daily basis and idolizes Adolph Hitler might be a danger (especially a group of those someones)? I would. So, the Jihadis that read their blood-stained book are a danger, also.

You'll notice, please, that I use "Islamic jihadists" or "Jihadis". I have NEVER claimed that all Muslims are evil, but all those that are forced to "study" in Madrasses and are force-fed a literal interpretation of the Qur'on ARE a serious threat to the Western way of life (which includes that pluralism that leftists claim to champion).



Michael




Just some "light" research, using some fairly conservative numbers/standards: https://youtu.be/g7TAAw3oQvg



Michael


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/25/2017 5:01:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Il Douche gets his info from Breitbart and Youtube, is that your bottom line then?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/25/2017 7:00:06 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11263
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Wow! So much to deal with, here. First, how condescending does this paragraph sound:

quote:

ORIGINAL: GaryWilcox

There isn't a preponderance of evidence that Muslims are all evil. There are no connection between these events. So posting them is an attempt to paint a negative impression of Muslims based on the actions of a few. That is Islamophobia. If I posted with the same kind of vigor about the awful things alleged Christians do, it would only serve to condemn Christianity, and would be manipulation on my part.



Preponderance of evidence? I have read the entire Qur'on (back in the 90s, before the rise of Al Qaeda/DAESH) and I have read it quite a few times, since then. While the Judeo-Christian Bible is full of explanations about why certain groups of people had to be killed (as an after-thought), the Qur'on extolls the virtues of killing the non-virtuous as an on-going endeavor and an easy ticket to "Heaven".

Would you say that anyone that reads "Mein Kampf" on a daily basis and idolizes Adolph Hitler might be a danger (especially a group of those someones)? I would. So, the Jihadis that read their blood-stained book are a danger, also.

You'll notice, please, that I use "Islamic jihadists" or "Jihadis". I have NEVER claimed that all Muslims are evil, but all those that are forced to "study" in Madrasses and are force-fed a literal interpretation of the Qur'on ARE a serious threat to the Western way of life (which includes that pluralism that leftists claim to champion).



Michael




Just some "light" research, using some fairly conservative numbers/standards: https://youtu.be/g7TAAw3oQvg



Michael



Any lone Muslim can self-radicalize simply by reading that book, and that frequently happens. Entire groups spring up based on the more nefarious teachings all of the time, all around the globe.

No, not all Muslims are bad but how do you know which ones truly disavow that book.

Look at it this way, if you were to stroll through pre-war Nazi Germany, I am sure you would meet many warm, wonderful Nazi people. "See? They don't mean any harm, they are people just like we are!"

They'd still be Nazis.

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/25/2017 7:24:26 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Donald Trump gets his information from Nazis. Got it. Why are you leaving out Russia and pedophiles though?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/25/2017 8:04:00 AM   
GaryWilcox


Posts: 95
Joined: 4/8/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
And if you'd actually read any of that, you'd see that they prevailed in all cases related to content.

You are an idiot as well as a liar. And smacking your idiocy down is like shooting fish in a fucking barrel.


So what you're saying is, some organizations DID legally challenge Wikipedia after all (what you lied about) and yet didn't win-- i.e., confirmed in court that Wikipedia did not libel those organizations.

Oh you poor moron.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/25/2017 8:06:23 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11263
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
And if you'd actually read any of that, you'd see that they prevailed in all cases related to content.

You are an idiot as well as a liar. And smacking your idiocy down is like shooting fish in a fucking barrel.



As I have posted before, he is a glutton for punishment

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his informa... - 2/25/2017 8:09:01 AM   
GaryWilcox


Posts: 95
Joined: 4/8/2016
Status: offline

quote:


As I have posted before


Indeed.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 114
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Lets Talk about where Donald Trump gets his information Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.219