Nnanji
Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
Awareness Do you have evidence contradicting the proposition? The kind of crude simplistic sexual stereotyping and genetic determinism displayed in tamaka's post has been abandoned for at least half a century by academic specialists in this area. If you knew anything about these issues, you wouldn't need evidence - you would know what nonsense tamaka's proposition is. If you knew anything about these issues, you would know that crude sexual stereotyping went out with the pixies. It is a measure of how limited your grasp of these issues is, it is an implicit admission of ignorance that you need to have evidence to prove such an elementary error incorrect. Where do you get that information? Not from the real world. It would be far more pertinent for you to tell us where you got your quaint ideas from. That is to say, if they're not pure conjecture, which they most likely are. One place you can find reliable information is: "Myths of Gender" By Anne Fausto-Sterling, Professor of Biology at Brown University. Fausto-Sterling systematically demolishes the myth of biological gender determination, which is the notion that underwrites all the varieties of crude sexual stereotyping such as the one you have advanced. Omg. You know, you can design and create research, especially in psychology, to 'find' anything you want. You can choose to believe anything that you wish. You can choose to ignore evidence based conclusions that have been replicated in hundreds if not thousands of studies over the years, tangible physical evidence not observational summations (as in psychology), because that evidence doesn't mesh with your quaint folk homilies or you can be an adult about it. Your choice. Hum, name me nine hundred and seventy seven.
|