quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nope but it does provide insight into dogshit44s overcompensating for his and his parties effeminate behaviors, felchgobbling, nutsucking, doing the airport bathrooms.
https://www.datalounge.com/thread/8441589-the-effeminate-guy-republican-connection
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/the-gop-has-a-feminine-face-finds-238867
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-graham/2009/03/04/wapo-animation-line-effeminate-republicans-kiss-limbaughs-butt
https://www.queerty.com/brief-history-antigay-politicians-caught-gay-things-public-restrooms-20161009

http://www.logcabin.org/ (they are given special veneration in the nutsucker party. In the democratic party they are not thought of as anything other than another party member)

The nutsuckers here on this forum are out of the closet now on their deep and abiding communism, time for the nutsuckers like dogshit44 et al, to come out of the closet in all respects.

come out of the closet and embrace your airport felchgobbling, doghshit44. You swish around here like a peri-menopausal drag queen in hysteria anyway, with your circlefelch. You aint fooling nobody.

And ManiacalMysery will continue to woo his mnottertroll brother as a political ally, count on it

Who on the left will condemn this diseased troll

The alt left cares not about gays or women or any minorities, they are radicals with mental disorders which the mnottertrolls of the world are in advanced stages of the disease

Do you dream about me at night?

I seem to be the center of your thinking quite frequently.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

this is so utterly priceless I just have to share it.

ive said at least a couple of times that mnottertroll lacks the ability to distinguish between things.

here's his UCLA study:

quote:

At least when it comes to female politicians, perhaps you can judge a book by its cover, suggest two UCLA researchers who looked at facial features and political stances in the U.S. House of Representatives

Female politicians with stereotypically feminine facial features are more likely to be Republican than Democrat, and the correlation increases the more conservative the lawmaker's voting record," said lead author Colleen M. Carpinella, a UCLA graduate student in psychology.

The researchers also found the opposite to be true: Female politicians with less stereotypically feminine facial features were more likely to be Democrats, and the more liberal their voting record, the greater the distance the politician's appearance strayed from stereotypical gender norms.

so the "gop has a feminine face" is because the women!

as for the men:

quote:

the faces of male Republicans, on average, scored as less masculine than the faces of their Democratic counterparts.

"It may be unnecessary for Republican men to exhibit masculinity through their appearance," Carpinella said. "Their policy advocacy and leadership roles may already confer these characteristics on them."

note it didn't say the men's appearances were feminine, it simply said "less masculine" than their counterparts. masculine is still masculine troll.

the effeminate guy/republican piece is an opinion from an anonymous guy commenting on staffers. it falls short on every principle necessary for it to be accepted as an alternative view to anything I posted earlier.

the Limbaugh piece is nothing but political snark and has no grounding whatsoever in research.

as to the "anti-gay" politicians caught doing things contrary to their stated position---that's not really an issue of "masculine or feminine" and even if it were, sorry mnottertroll---gay people are found in all political persuasions and there are many reasons for people to speak one thing out loud, but act in another when in private.

you really suck at this mnottertroll (no pun intended to the sentence above).

and no townhall---how 'bout that?

felllllllllllllllllllch gobble!