RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action

RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action (4/2/2017 11:47:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery ??? Of course there's data. Whether there's a willingness to look at it is another thing. Of course Since Europe has been settled for quite a while climate data there exist locally back to the Middle Ages, and modern scientific data for centuries. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorologisches_Observatorium_Hohenpei%C3%9Fenberg Manipulated data Scandal plagued misrepresentation of data "Scientists" who refuse to release their publicly funded "research data" to those who pay the bills Yes, the world manipulates it so the nutsuckers look retarded............hmmmmm, dont the nutsuckers look retarded in the first place, it requires no conspiracy by people with intellect and facts. Sorry retard. You are felchgobbling

Musicmystery -> RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action (4/7/2017 5:14:41 AM)
Reps who deny science should be denied air time on the magic box of shadows.

bounty44 -> RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action (4/7/2017 6:06:36 AM)
you are not the final arbiter of who "believes in" or who "denies" science or what that looks like in terms of legislative responsibility. in fact, your closed minded statement disqualifies you as an arbiter at all. smug pompous ass.

mnottertail -> RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action (4/7/2017 6:09:25 AM)
and you are not the final arbiter of anything other than nutsucker slobberblogs, impotent ineffective felchgobbling retarded putinjizz gobbler.

Musicmystery -> RE: 17 House Republicans call for climate change action (4/7/2017 6:20:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 you are not the final arbiter of who "believes in" or who "denies" science or what that looks like in terms of legislative responsibility. in fact, your closed minded statement disqualifies you as an arbiter at all. smug pompous ass. Fool, I'm not an arbitrator at all...the science denial is their own words. Do they get to be arbitrators of their own opinions?

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875