Very Fake News (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:19:49 AM)

CNN, that other wild-eyed psychopathic Trump-bashing network, is reporting that Sean Hannity pulled a gun on Juan Williams in an irresponsible and threatening manner

http://money.cnn.com/2017/03/16/media/sean-hannity-juan-williams-gun/index.html

A report that is sensationalist bullshit

AKA very fake news

quote:

Williams, who serves as an analyst for Fox News, downplayed the incident in a statement on Twitter.

"This incident is being sensationalized – everything was under total control throughout and I never felt like I was put in harm’s way," Williams said. "It was clear that Sean put my safety and security above all else and we continue to be great friends."

Nothing unsafe or threatening whatsoever occurred.




mnottertail -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:21:05 AM)

Yeah, the fake news story you got there is fake news.




Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:33:53 AM)

So he did point a gun,
not fake news
He pointed it at Juan williams...
not fake news

and the CNN story also posted what you said in your addition from usatoday.
"Sean Hannity has been trained in firearm safety since he was 11 years old and has a license to carry a gun in five states, including New York," Fox News said in a statement to CNNMoney. "The situation was thoroughly investigated and it was found that no one was put in any danger." (The spokesperson said the incident took place in October 2016.)The Fox News spokesperson also provided the following statements from Hannity and Williams."While discussing the issue of firearms, I showed my good friend Juan Williams my unloaded firearm in a professional and safe manner for educational purposes only," Hannity's statement read. "Every precautionary procedure that I have been trained in since the age of 11 was followed. I've had a conceal carry permit in five states for all of my adult life. Any other interpretation of this is outright false reporting.""This incident is being sensationalized -- everything was under total control throughout and I never felt like I was put in harm's way," Williams' statement read. "It was clear that Sean put my safety and security above all else and we continue to be great friends."
straight from your own link to cnn
clearly you didnt read all the way through.

sad




BoscoX -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:38:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

So he did point a gun,
not fake news
He pointed it at Juan williams...
not fake news

and the CNN story also posted what you said in your addition from usatoday.
"Sean Hannity has been trained in firearm safety since he was 11 years old and has a license to carry a gun in five states, including New York," Fox News said in a statement to CNNMoney. "The situation was thoroughly investigated and it was found that no one was put in any danger." (The spokesperson said the incident took place in October 2016.)The Fox News spokesperson also provided the following statements from Hannity and Williams."While discussing the issue of firearms, I showed my good friend Juan Williams my unloaded firearm in a professional and safe manner for educational purposes only," Hannity's statement read. "Every precautionary procedure that I have been trained in since the age of 11 was followed. I've had a conceal carry permit in five states for all of my adult life. Any other interpretation of this is outright false reporting.""This incident is being sensationalized -- everything was under total control throughout and I never felt like I was put in harm's way," Williams' statement read. "It was clear that Sean put my safety and security above all else and we continue to be great friends."
straight from your own link to cnn
clearly you didnt read all the way through.

sad


Your pathetic spin is a bigger joke than modern "reporting".

How the CNN article begins:

quote:

Sean Hannity is surrounded by jackasses.

The Wall Street Journal columnist who called Hannity the "dumbest anchor" on Fox News is a "jackass," according to Hannity. The forensic psychologist who suggested a blood vessel had popped inside Hannity's brain is a "jackass." Even the conservative MSNBC host who sometimes criticizes President Donald Trump is a "jackass."

If you criticize Hannity, or the Trump administration, there is a fair chance he will call you a "jackass" on Twitter. The chances of being called a "jackass" by Hannity are significantly higher late at night. Of the 21 people Hannity called a "jackass" in the last year, nearly half were told off between 9 p.m and 2 a.m.

Hannity, Trump's biggest backer on television, has said this is entertainment for him: "I am a counterpuncher," he told one Twitter user who asked why he was so antagonistic. "I do not start fights but I finish them. This is pure entertainment for me. If people take cheap shots I hit back."

Still, Hannity's version of entertainment can go too far. Last year, after ending one of his many spirited on-air arguments with liberal contributor Juan Williams, Hannity pulled out a gun and pointed it directly at Williams...







Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:40:43 AM)

as I said, you didnt read right the way through

thats your issue,
spin....yours




BoscoX -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:46:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

as I said, you didnt read right the way through

thats your issue,
spin....yours


Your psycho powers have failed you again, Crazy Lucy

I read the whole thing

They stated as a matter of fact that the incident was in anger, and dangerous, as the opening statement

But it was nothing of the sort.

It was another smear, the same kind of smear that you suck up on a daily basis as fact because you love love love you some alt left propaganda





Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 6:53:05 AM)

no, it was your smear that failed.
again
and again, and again.
you adding your feeels isnt fact

PS, if you read it all the way thru, why cover the same comment from another source.?




BoscoX -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 7:15:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

no, it was your smear that failed.
again
and again, and again.
you adding your feeels isnt fact

PS, if you read it all the way thru, why cover the same comment from another source.?


That's hardly the question.

The real question is, why do people continue to take CNN (or any of the other fake news outlets) seriously




mnottertail -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 7:28:48 AM)

Because the only alternative is nutsucker lying pedophile pimping propaganda from Washington Times, Drudge, Zero Hedge, Townhall, Faux Noize, IJReview, Daily Caller, and so on, and all that fake news.

So we go where facts are at least at a 75%ile.





Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 7:49:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

no, it was your smear that failed.
again
and again, and again.
you adding your feeels isnt fact

PS, if you read it all the way thru, why cover the same comment from another source.?


That's hardly the question.

The real question is, why do people continue to take CNN (or any of the other fake news outlets) seriously

hey you are the one that posted the story from CNN, why do you believe what they say.
Its like you posting snopes links and CNN links. but telling us they are far left and liars.
Ive said many times I dont trust CNN...especially since zucker took over.
But hey
you believe you can get away with lies, so
have at it
WHy use a source that basically says EXACTLY what CNN says, and claim that is the "truth"




BoscoX -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 7:54:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

no, it was your smear that failed.
again
and again, and again.
you adding your feeels isnt fact

PS, if you read it all the way thru, why cover the same comment from another source.?


That's hardly the question.

The real question is, why do people continue to take CNN (or any of the other fake news outlets) seriously

hey you are the one that posted the story from CNN, why do you believe what they say.
Its like you posting snopes links and CNN links. but telling us they are far left and liars.
Ive said many times I dont trust CNN...especially since zucker took over.
But hey
you believe you can get away with lies, so
have at it
WHy use a source that basically says EXACTLY what CNN says, and claim that is the "truth"


Why do alt left radicals always have to devolve these threads into something personal

(Rhetorical question - the answer is obvious. Alt left radicals are allergic to facts.)

Re your derail, I amuse myself by poking journalism's dead carcass with a stick

/derail




Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 8:04:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

no, it was your smear that failed.
again
and again, and again.
you adding your feeels isnt fact

PS, if you read it all the way thru, why cover the same comment from another source.?


That's hardly the question.

The real question is, why do people continue to take CNN (or any of the other fake news outlets) seriously

hey you are the one that posted the story from CNN, why do you believe what they say.
Its like you posting snopes links and CNN links. but telling us they are far left and liars.
Ive said many times I dont trust CNN...especially since zucker took over.
But hey
you believe you can get away with lies, so
have at it
WHy use a source that basically says EXACTLY what CNN says, and claim that is the "truth"


Why do alt left radicals always have to devolve these threads into something personal





you mean like saying
quote:

Your psycho powers have failed you again, Crazy Lucy




mnottertail -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 8:05:02 AM)

perhaps you can comment on the fake news out of the whitehouse, that the nutsuckers had to get on their knees and beg forgiveness from the UK for in the middle of the night? Nutsuckers are weak, and they make America look weak. They are inept and make America look inept. They are retarded felchgobblers and make you nutsuckers look like retarded felchgobblers.

Fake news from Felchgobbler Gobbles, its what he does, besides pimping pedophiles and felchgobbling in airport bathrooms.




Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 8:14:31 AM)

yeah there is this out on media matters:)

https://mediamatters.org/blog/2017/03/17/sean-spicer-caused-international-incident-citing-fox-news-defend-trump/215734

The U.S. government has issued a formal apology to the United Kingdom after White House press secretary Sean Spicer cited a Fox News report to accuse a British intelligence service of spying on Trump Tower on behalf of then-President Barack Obama.

The British newspaper The Telegraph reports that U.S. National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster “contacted Sir Mark Lyall Grant, the Prime Minister's National Security adviser, to apologise for the comments. Mr Spicer conveyed his apology through Sir Kim Darroch, Britain's US ambassador.”

Over the past two weeks, Spicer has issued a series of increasingly frantic statements to support President Donald Trump’s baseless conspiracy theory that Obama wiretapped him during the 2016 presidential campaign. Yesterday, after the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees said that they have seen no evidence to support Trump’s claim, Spicer read aloud from a series of news articles that he falsely claimed supported Trump’s statement.

Amid this litany, Spicer cited Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano’s anonymously sourced March 13 statement that Obama had relied on the U.K. Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) to obtain transcripts of “conversations involving President-elect Trump” with “no American fingerprints on this.”

As I noted yesterday, in making the comments, Spicer imperiled our relations with our closest ally in order to buttress an obviously false Trump statement. Napolitano is a conspiracy theorist who has suggested the government may have been involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. His claim about British intelligence appears to have originated with a report on the state-sponsored Russian news network RT, and a British security official denied the claim, telling Reuters it was "totally untrue and quite frankly absurd."

Spicer’s decision to make the same allegation from the White House podium drew a furious response from GCHQ, as The Telegraph reported:

In a break from its normal practice of refusing to comment on allegations about its activities, a spokesman for GCHQ said: "Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct 'wiretapping' against the then president elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored."

The increased scrutiny of Fox News in the U.K. comes at an inopportune time for the network’s parent company, 21st Century Fox, and its CEO, Rupert Murdoch. 21st Century Fox is currently trying to take full control of the United Kingdom satellite broadcasting company Sky, which oversees Sky News. Yesterday, the British culture secretary, Karen Bradley, referred the $14.3 billion bid to British media regulator Ofcom, in part over concerns about whether the company is “whether Fox is committed to the required editorial standards, such as accuracy and impartial news coverage,” according to The Guardian. ​

The White House’s open insult to the British government comes after conservatives spent years trumping up baseless claims that Obama was trying to undermine our relationship with the United Kingdom.

Right-wing media figures for years decried the return to the U.K. of a bust of Winston Churchill that President George W. Bush had kept in the Oval Office when Obama took office, citing the move as evidence that Obama hated the British and had grievously insulted our strongest ally. When Trump had the bust returned to the Oval Office following his inauguration, conservative media outlets swooned.

Less than two months later, the White House has had to apologize to the British government for baselessly accusing the country of spying on Trump.

Links to websites in the above
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-wiretapping-idUSKBN16L2UV
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKBN16N2K3
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/16/gchq-issues-unprecedented-public-statement-dismiss-trump-tower/
https://mediamatters.org/blog/2017/03/16/sean-spicer-cited-9-11-truther-accuse-british-spying-trump-obama/215723
https://twitter.com/jonswaine/status/842462279656456192
https://mediamatters.org/research/2017/03/14/fox-news-conspiracy-obama-asked-british-intelligence-wiretap-donald-trump-echoes-rt-interview/215678
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/17/us-makes-formal-apology-britain-white-house-accuses-gchq-wiretapping/
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-pol-us-russia-20170316-story.html




Lucylastic -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 8:20:28 AM)


BREAKING NEWS
President Trump's aides tried to soothe angry leaders in Britain after suggesting their spies wiretapped Trump Tower
Friday, March 17, 2017 10:05 AM EDT
The White House tried to soothe an angry Britain after suggesting that President Barack Obama used London’s spy agency to conduct secret surveillance on President Trump while he was a candidate last year.
Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, and Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, the president’s national security adviser, both contacted British officials to try to deal with an unusual rupture between the United States and its closest international ally. British media reported that they offered apologies, but the White House did not immediately comment on Friday morning.
Read more »https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/world/europe/trump-britain-obama-wiretap-gchq.html




Real0ne -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 8:21:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

as I said, you didnt read right the way through

thats your issue,
spin....yours


Your psycho powers have failed you again, Crazy Lucy

I read the whole thing

They stated as a matter of fact that the incident was in anger, and dangerous, as the opening statement

But it was nothing of the sort.

It was another smear, the same kind of smear that you suck up on a daily basis as fact because you love love love you some alt left propaganda





they are using antiquated orwellian double-think propaganda tactics, where they present the agenda first to create the image in your mind then later after the image is implanted tell you details which disprove the image. The image is stronger and usually imbedded deeper than the correction therefore tends to stick better long term.

Its all propaganda psychology, many people are oblivious to high iq think tanker propaganda methods.




BoscoX -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 8:09:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

they are using antiquated orwellian double-think propaganda tactics, where they present the agenda first to create the image in your mind then later after the image is implanted tell you details which disprove the image. The image is stronger and usually imbedded deeper than the correction therefore tends to stick better long term.

Its all propaganda psychology, many people are oblivious to high iq think tanker propaganda methods.


Kinda bizarre that they seem to enjoy being handled that way




mnottertail -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 10:46:10 PM)

Theres a sight, you and realretard felchgobbling each other, trading your putinjizz and your hitlejizz in intimate moments, felchgobbler gobbles.

You could do a duet pimping pedophiles when you become spent.




Edwird -> RE: Very Fake News (3/17/2017 11:02:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

AKA very fake news


Right up your alley.

What's your complaint, bitch?







jlf1961 -> RE: Very Fake News (3/18/2017 12:36:32 AM)

Lucy, and anyone else, might want to read Trump stands by wiretapping claim during Merkel visit

This is of course after the Trump aids tried to sooth the ruffled feathers of the UK.


As for pointing a gun at another person.

Every firearms instructor for gun safety classes sponsored by the NRA, every law enforcement instructor, every military firearms instructor, will rip someone a new ass for pointing a gun at anyone, regardless of who is pointing it and how much training they may or may not have had.

The fucking headlines are full of 'accidental gun deaths' due to someone pointing a gun at someone, thinking it was unloaded or assuming it was unloaded.

Hell that is the first thing I taught my kids about guns, even play guns, NEVER POINT THEM AT PEOPLE!

Regardless of what the intention was, it is stupid to do so.

And bosco, seeing as how you are defending this proves one thing.

You are willing to through common sense out the window just to condemn some news agency you do not agree with.


quote:

NRA Gun Safety
The fundamental NRA rules for safe gun handling are:

1. ALWAYS keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.
This is the primary rule of gun safety. A safe direction means that the gun is pointed so that even if it were to go off it would not cause injury or damage. The key to this rule is to control where the muzzle or front end of the barrel is pointed at all times. Common sense dictates the safest direction, depending on different circumstances.


2. ALWAYS keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot.
When holding a gun, rest your finger on the trigger guard or along the side of the gun. Until you are actually ready to fire, do not touch the trigger.

3. ALWAYS keep the gun unloaded until ready to use.
Whenever you pick up a gun, immediately engage the safety device if possible, and, if the gun has a magazine, remove it before opening the action and looking into the chamber(s) which should be clear of ammunition. If you do not know how to open the action or inspect the chamber(s), leave the gun alone and get help from someone who does.
When using or storing a gun, always follow these NRA rules:

Know your target and what is beyond.
Be absolutely sure you have identified your target beyond any doubt. Equally important, be aware of the area beyond your target. This means observing your prospective area of fire before you shoot. Never fire in a direction in which there are people or any other potential for mishap. Think first. Shoot second.

Know how to use the gun safely.
Before handling a gun, learn how it operates. Know its basic parts, how to safely open and close the action and remove any ammunition from the gun or magazine. Remember, a gun's mechanical safety device is never foolproof. Nothing can ever replace safe gun handling.

Be sure the gun is safe to operate.
Just like other tools, guns need regular maintenance to remain operable. Regular cleaning and proper storage are a part of the gun's general upkeep. If there is any question concerning a gun's ability to function, a knowledgeable gunsmith should look at it.

Use only the correct ammunition for your gun.
Only BBs, pellets, cartridges or shells designed for a particular gun can be fired safely in that gun. Most guns have the ammunition type stamped on the barrel. Ammunition can be identified by information printed on the box and sometimes stamped on the cartridge. Do not shoot the gun unless you know you have the proper ammunition.
Source


Does it say anywhere in there that it is okay to point a gun at someone if you because you are well trained?

There is no way in hell any responsible gun owner can condone or even attempt to write this off.

Bosco, you have proven once and for all that you are a complete moron with an IQ lower than your shoe size and absolutely no common sense.

Even if CNN is wrong in context it is correct in the simple fact that even the NRA would support that the act was dumb ass stupid.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625