RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims

RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

BoscoX -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 5:44:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 its interesting too to note that of course shepherd smith is telling the definitive truth when he declares "no evidence"---and not from the perspective of that there could be but just that there isn't yet and rather that trumps making all this up---but judge Napolitano and Hannity are "lying" when they say something different. It's fun how FOX News is the apple of the alt left's eye, if it fits their false narrative at a given moment

bounty44 -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 6:05:50 AM)
part of that comes from their mistaken (no surprise) notion that fox news is a monolithic right wing propaganda organization and so whenever fox fails to toe the party line, its breaking news. plus lucy and the other comrades continue to not know what a "lie" is.

Lucylastic -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 6:14:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 its interesting too to note that of course shepherd smith is telling the definitive truth when he declares "no evidence"---and not from the perspective of that there could be but just that there isn't yet and rather that trumps making all this up---but judge Napolitano and Hannity are "lying" when they say something different. Well we have been waiting on the "facts" from trump about his claim for nearly two weeks now and he hasnt backed it up...Shammity and Napolitano havent got anything better he has. Oh and Trump is blaming fox and napolitano for his "info" where is their proof? oops

kdsub -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 6:40:56 AM)
If in two weeks, Trumps own timetable, there is no proof of wiretapping and the President refuses to acknowledge he was mistaken...will you lose confidence in his credibility? Butch

WickedsDesire -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 7:22:51 AM)
Isn't trump middle name lyingfuk? Oh come on I’ve lost count of the lying fuks lies. He just opens his orange gob (lizard tongue all over the place(hunting for the pussy no doubt)) and comes forth a splattering stream of raw effluent which some of you right wing nut jobs hungrily lap up like the pathetic wretches you are. "[18.03.17 14:31] Nooo lizards are nice" guffaws

kdsub -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 7:44:23 AM)
I am just wondering how far the man will go as an apologist for President Trump. I don't begrudge him on conservative positions, I have them myself, but I will not blindly follow someone that puts pride above service. Butch

BoscoX -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 8:34:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub If in two weeks, Trumps own timetable, there is no proof of wiretapping and the President refuses to acknowledge he was mistaken...will you lose confidence in his credibility? Butch The left is at war against free speech, Butch. The left is at war with traditional America, they hate capitalism and everything that makes capitalism possible Which, that is freedom Every false narrative that the left is shoving down your throat is a part of that war 1. They screamed for months and months that Donald Trump was under investigation for his "Russian ties". His arrest was always imminent, any second now a grand jury will indict, blah blah blah On and on with that narrative, and you bought it hook line and sinker because you are a sucker fish NOW, none of that ever happened. Anyone who mentions it isn't credible, despite all of the media reports backing him up In other words, you have gone insane Butch. Get help No, I am never abandoning the defense of freedom.

BoscoX -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 8:38:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Isn't trump middle name lyingfuk? Oh come on I’ve lost count of the lying fuks lies. He just opens his orange gob (lizard tongue all over the place(hunting for the pussy no doubt)) and comes forth a splattering stream of raw effluent which some of you right wing nut jobs hungrily lap up like the pathetic wretches you are. "[18.03.17 14:31] Nooo lizards are nice" guffaws Orange skin, the left will stop at nothing Attack his race, accuse him of being gay Physically attacking women and old people for attending speeches... Fucking Nazis

kdsub -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 8:48:45 AM)
So defense of freedom means following a man who falsely accuses people of crimes... then refuses to back up his accusations? You really want this kind of man as your President? This is not about Russia and the investigation... this is not about Democrats or conservatives... this is about respect of the Presidency and what it stands for. Why is is so hard for you to keep your views on what this nation needs separate from the dishonorable actions of a man that is destroying your party? Butch

BoscoX -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 9:03:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub So defense of freedom means following a man who falsely accuses people of crimes... then refuses to back up his accusations? You really want this kind of man as your President? This is not about Russia and the investigation... this is not about Democrats or conservatives... this is about respect of the Presidency and what it stands for. Why is is so hard for you to keep your views on what this nation needs separate from the dishonorable actions of a man that is destroying your party? Butch Why is it so hard for you to respond to what I posted, rather than what your voices are whispering

kdsub -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 9:06:19 AM)
Because you never answered my post... you can't have it both ways. I'll be happy to discuss your issues as long as you directly answer mine? Butch

WickedsDesire -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 9:21:28 AM)
ah apologies kdsub i reply just to the general thread usually - i am pants at hitting the correct reply button so dont bother - everyone knows that. And I like to go to a modicum of non lazy bother by typing someones name in blue if i am mentioning them, something they said etc...and that stops 10 pages of the same quotes to effectively read one page. I still think he is an utter nutter and a dangerous one at that. I am also curious as to how many lies, and by fukery the lying fuks are all whoppers, he can actually tell to the American people, and indeed the world. Do you think a shock collar would work on the mad fuk?...... personally I don't care if its republican or democrat that runs the united states. Its not so much i think hes unfit to be called president as in my mind he is not fit to be called human. Still i am enjoying the show for now. I suspect his lineage to be some form of missing link that went feral a long time ago never to return to civlisation. He just opens his orange gob (lizard tongue all over the place(hunting for the pussy no doubt)) and comes forth a splattering stream of raw effluent which some of you right wing nut jobs hungrily lap up like the pathetic wretches you are. ..thats his followers to me...boscoxs likes the steam of the aforementioned effluent....hes not coming back either kdsub

LTE -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:17:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 its interesting too to note that of course shepherd smith is telling the definitive truth when he declares "no evidence"---and not from the perspective of that there could be but just that there isn't yet and rather that trumps making all this up---but judge Napolitano and Hannity are "lying" when they say something different. Not knowing of evidence does not make the claim false. Those saying the claim is false also assume the left and Obama were following the rules and did this lawfully. That is an interesting false perspective based on past history.

LTE -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:24:01 AM)
quote: LOL... some people still believe there is something impossibly intelligent behind all of this fucking insanity. Trump didn't win the election because he is smart, he won it because so many American voters are stupid. This is what Hillary thought also before she lost. Deplorable also. Still, he and they won. So if they won and were stupid then what does that make the losers?

LTE -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:27:12 AM)
Trump said he would win. True. Trump said the media were biased. True. Trump said he would do what he said he would do. True. Obama said you can keep your doctor. Obama said he would bring us all together. Obama said he would bring manufacturing back. Obama said Trump would not win.

LTE -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:30:18 AM)
Remember when Obama waited months to produce a less than official birth certificate? Chess.

LTE -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:32:48 AM)
Being a winner feels good. Trump feels good. I feel good. How about you?

Milesnmiles -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:34:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice The biased liberal media strikes again. Fox News host Shepard Smith said on Friday afternoon that the network's news division was unable to confirm a report from an analyst who said earlier this week President Barack Obama sought help from British intelligence to spy on then-candidate Donald Trump. "Fox News cannot confirm Judge [Andrew] Napolitano's commentary," Smith said. "Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now-president of the United States was surveilled at any time, in any way. Full stop." Emphasis mine. Link includes video of Smith's statement. http://www.businessinsider.com/shepard-smith-fox-news-napolitano-trump-wiretapping-gchq-2017-3 I know I don't watch a lot of Fox News but are you saying Fox News is now part of the "biased liberal media"? When did that happen? ;-)

BoscoX -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:37:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LTE quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 its interesting too to note that of course shepherd smith is telling the definitive truth when he declares "no evidence"---and not from the perspective of that there could be but just that there isn't yet and rather that trumps making all this up---but judge Napolitano and Hannity are "lying" when they say something different. Not knowing of no evidence does not make the claim false. Those saying the claim is false also assume the left and Obama were following the rules and did this lawfully. That is an interesting false perspective based on past history. Right, Obama's hacking Merkel, Obama's aid in overthrowing our ally in Egypt in favor of the radical Muslim Brotherhood, Obama's meddling in the Israeli elections, and everything else we learned through Wikileaks

Milesnmiles -> RE: Fox News: "No Evidence" for Trump's Surveillance Claims (3/18/2017 11:38:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LTE Remember when Obama waited months to produce a less than official birth certificate? Chess. Remember when Trump waited months to produce his tax returns? Oh wait, he still hasn't produced them? ;-)

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875