|
BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 5:48:49 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
um, exactly what "evidence?"
and please can you elaborate on how trump would have effectively put the kibosh the nsa, cia, and fbi pursuant to any illegal activity he was supposedly engaged in?
The Erik Prince story was reported by Adam Entous, Greg Miller, Kevin Sieff and Karen DeYoung - Sourcing U.S., European AND Arab Officials.
Paul Manafort's name was on the f*cking ledger found in Victor Yanukovych's house! Further quoting Manafort's own memo describing his work: “can greatly benefit the Putin Government” and “can re-focus, both internally and externally, the policies of the Putin government.”
The Michael Flynn story is well reported and sourced from offcials from several countries including Andrii Artemenko
Wilbur Ross' stake inthe Bank Of Cyprus is well known and documented in official documents (he does not deny it)
Keep in mind, if it were not for Team Obama, and specifically Susan Rice, the evidence would have remained at NSA, and the FBI.
As for how Trump would effectively kibosh the nsa, cia, and fbi... I am not sure. But here is how he would try:
NSA - Appoint Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor. He would bury this in a heartbeat.
CIA - Sworn to secrecy, and hopefully no leaks (good luck with that)
FBI - Appoint Jeff Sessions as AG (who would bury the FBI investigation, or keep it low level and refuse to prosecute anyone)
Hope this helps!
no it doesn't help in the least.
telling me "there are stories" isn't actually evidence. what actual evidence exists of collusion between Russia and trump officials to sway the election such that Obama was wanting to prevent trump from burying it?
having business deals, conversations with, etc, or even guilt by association (never mind misinterpretation) with Russians in a global world, is not evidence of wrong doing period, much less collusion.
and no---the surveillance of trump took place many months before the election.
whats more---right, you want the reader to believe that these agencies would be sitting on top of evidence that trump colluded with Russia, and would be silent about it simply because their newly appointed bosses says so?
whats the more likely scenario---that rice and Obama were protecting the national security of America, or they were setting out to harm the political campaign of a figure with whom they vehemently disagreed? even apart from reporters telling us its the latter, id opt for that one too.
Susan Rice isn't a detective or a law enforcement officer, she is a political operative, who is proven to be totally dishonest. She is the same Susan Rice who Obama sent to five different Sunday morning talk shows to push the lie that the Benghazi terrorist attack was only a minor protest caused by a video
They imprisoned a man over that lie, the man who made the video. She has no morals. She is a known, proven liar
|
|
|
|
