RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


bounty44 -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 6:22:10 AM)

heard judge nap (oh no comrades! especially vile critter parts) say yesterday that the president indeed can order surveillance on people independent of FISA and that when susan rice had mentioned otherwise, he said she was wrong.




mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 7:25:09 AM)

Yeah, old judge nappies said it, just like the UK was doing it for the Obama administration like he said.

No doubt judge nappies got it right so many times before, he gets a best felchgobbler star.

LOL. you desperate factless felchgobbling commie nutsuckers are choking on your own felch.

Dogshit44, you get a best felchgobbler star too.

I see that no facts or citations of the USC are forthcoming though, so you only get a yellow star, not a real red one, comrade dogshit44. Da Svedanya, nootzukorshki.




bounty44 -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 7:25:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

whats more---right, you want the reader to believe that these agencies would be sitting on top of evidence that trump colluded with Russia, and would be silent about it simply because their newly appointed bosses says so?

whats the more likely scenario---that rice and Obama were protecting the national security of America, or they were setting out to harm the political campaign of a figure with whom they vehemently disagreed? even apart from reporters telling us its the latter, id opt for that one too.



rand paul suspicious of the same:

"Rand Paul: If Rice’s Snooping Wasn’t Political…Why Wasn’t FBI Involved?"

(oh no mnottertroll, townhall! what will your paroxysm of the day look like in response to that? I bet no one can tell!)

quote:

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) believes Susan Rice did not sufficiently answer Andrea Mitchell’s questions on Tuesday. When the MSNBC anchor pressed the former national security adviser over whether she spied on the Trump transition team and unmasked their names for political purposes, Rice said surveillance was well within her job description.

“We only do it to protect the American people and to do our jobs," she told Mitchell, adding she never “leaked nothing to nobody.”

“I don’t think she answered the question,” Paul said on Fox News Wednesday.

If it wasn’t for political reasons and she was really seeking the information for foreign intelligence reasons, Paul wondered, then why wasn’t the FBI involved?

He had more questions.

“Did the president direct you to eavesdrop and sift through intelligence?” Paul asked, wondering if President Obama was behind the privacy breach.

Paul, who is known as a champion for Americans’ privacy, said the situation raises too many constitutional alarm bells.

“We need to protect American privacy,” he said. “We can’t let political partisans search through databases.”

Paul is demanding Rice testify in front of a grand jury and explain why her actions weren’t political.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/04/05/rand-paul-if-rices-snooping-wasnt-politicalwhy-wasnt-fbi-involved-n2309142









mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 7:28:58 AM)

LOL. Rand Paul has a blown headpipe, just like you blow putin.

The FBI was involved, Comey and Roberts (oh oh nutsucker comrades CIA too, so it goes into international) said so at the house investigation. You dont watch the real stuff though, dogshit44, that would require intelligence, and you are not beyond felchgobbling townhall because they think for you, but they cant think.

Facts are not your friend, PutinJizzgobbler44.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 7:35:19 AM)

Yeah yeah yeah gramps, eeeeeveryones a faggot

Heard it all before

Time to change your Depends and take your Donepezil now




mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 7:50:33 AM)

go clean the shit out of your pants, the putinjizz and old il douche dingleberries out of your mouth, the nazi jizz from your ass, and get yourself a sack to sew on and pretend to be a man.

Again, you are pointed out to be a factless retard. Sorry, but it is what it is.





mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 2:58:55 PM)

Give him a chance they say.
Yeah, probably nothing...
"I know – it’s hard for me to see any U.S. ties to Russia…except for the Flynn thing and the Manafort thing
and the Tillerson thing
and the Sessions thing
and the Kushner thing
and the Carter Page thing
and the Roger Stone thing
and the Felix Sater thing
and the Boris Ephsteyn thing
and the Rosneft thing
and the Gazprom thing
and the Sergey Gorkov banker thing
and the Azerbajain thing
and the “I love Putin” thing
and the Donald Trump, Jr. thing
and the Sergey Kislyak thing
and the Russian Affiliated Interests thing
and the Russian Business Interests thing
and the Emoluments Clause thing
and the Alex Schnaider thing
and the hack of the DNC thing
and the Guccifer 2.0 thing
and the Mike Pence “I don’t know anything” thing
and the Russians mysteriously dying thing
and Trump’s public request to Russia to hack Hillary’s email thing
and the Trump house sale for $100 million at the bottom of the housing bust to the Russian fertilizer king thing
and the Russian fertilizer king’s plane showing up in Concord, NC during Trump rally campaign thing
and the Nunes sudden flight to the White House in the night thing
and the Nunes personal investments in the Russian winery thing
and the Cyprus bank thing
and Trump not releasing his tax returns thing
and the Republican Party’s rejection of an amendment to require Trump to show his taxes thing
and the election hacking thing
and the GOP platform change to the Ukraine thing
and the Steele Dossier thing
and the Leninist Bannon thing
and the Sally Yates can’t testify thing
and the intelligence community’s investigative reports thing
and Trump’s reassurance that the Russian connection is all “fake news” thing
and Spicer’s Russian Dressing “nothing’s wrong” thing
so there’s probably nothing there
since the swamp has been drained, these people would never lie
probably why Nunes cancels the investigation meetings
all of this must be normal
just a bunch of separate dots with no connection." ~ Lane Crothers




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 3:37:53 PM)

Take your Alzheimers meds gramps

Wrong thread again

Then change your Depends




mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 4:02:40 PM)

nope, right thread, vacuum some of the PutinJizz out of your brains, wipe your ass, gargle with something other than Il Douchovitches ass and get a sack.

You useless cockgargler, quit gimping for the entire compound. Get some self respect with that sack you need.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 4:08:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

nope, right thread, vacuum some of the PutinJizz out of your brains, wipe your ass, gargle with something other than Il Douchovitches ass and get a sack.

You useless cockgargler, quit gimping for the entire compound. Get some self respect with that sack you need.


Yeah yeah yeah gramps, we know. Everyone's a faggot





mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 5:06:43 PM)

listen snowflake, change your panties the skid marks are a foot deep in them. then get yourself a sack, and dont beg to be the compound gimp again.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/5/2017 6:36:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

The Erik Prince story was reported by Adam Entous, Greg Miller, Kevin Sieff and Karen DeYoung - Sourcing U.S., European AND Arab Officials.

All of whom work for the Washington Post, which was bought by Jeffry Bezos for the express purpose to help elect Hillary Clinton - not exactly a reliable source for factual, nonpartisan information. Openly warring with Trump, rather. And they cited anonymous sources. Nothing verified, no crimes known to have been committed. And where did the officials supposedly get their information... Thats the catch. Obama was illegally spying on the Trump campaign, beginning last October



I appreciate your Jeff Bezos conspiracy theories. Unless you can point to any factual errors in this or ANY story by these writers, your argument is ridiculous at best. Writers cite anonymous sources all the time. As for crimes known to have been committed. How about treason? Their sources (from the US, the UAE and Europe), who have first hand knowledge (keep in mind it was an Emirati who set up the meeting) of the meeting, said that Erik Prince, indicated that he was representing the Trump administration in advancing Russian interests. If such a meeting occurred (as those in a position to know say it did), that is treason.

quote:

Paul Manafort's name was on the f*cking ledger found in Victor Yanukovych's house! Further quoting Manafort's own memo describing his work: “can greatly benefit the Putin Government” and “can re-focus, both internally and externally, the policies of the Putin government.”

President Elect Trump fired Manafort for failing to reveal that he had worked for the Russian billionaire

So what



I am not sure exactly for what he was fired. He worked for the former Ukranian President, as well as Oleg Deripaska, and laundered the money through New York Real Estate deals. The Trump campaign had to have known this when they hired him.

quote:

The Michael Flynn story is well reported and sourced from offcials from several countries including Andrii Artemenko
Wilbur Ross' stake in the Bank Of Cyprus is well known and documented in official documents (he does not deny it)

Flynn is among those who had been illegally surveilled and illegally unmasked by team Obama, which (again) had been using the NSA to illegally spy on the Trump team for political purposes. And again, fired as soon as it was found that he was dishonest to Pence. No crimes are known tom have been committed, except on the part of team Obama



Pure nonsense (in the truest sense of the word). There is ZERO evidence of anyone being illegally surveilled. The NSA routinely surveils individuals it deems to be a threat to national security. No known crimes??? How about violation of the Logan Act. He is KNOWN (by people in a position to know, the FBI HAS the transcript) to discuss sanctions with Sergey Kislyak.

You really need to get your information outside of the right-wing echo chamber.


quote:

Keep in mind, if it were not for Team Obama, and specifically Susan Rice, the evidence would have remained at NSA, and the FBI.

By illegally unmasking American citizens who the Obama team had been using the NSA to spy on, and disseminating the classified documents far and wide \thus ensuring that they would be leaked to Democrat-friendly media such as the Washington Post

Illegal as hell, but not on the part of anyone around Trump. It was Obama who ordered the felonies, and Rice and company who committed the felonies - and its all coming to a head



Again, the same right-wing talking points (I feel like I'm watching Hannity). Who illegally unmasked anyone, and just HOW was it illegal? And what evidence do you have of any of this????

quote:


As for how Trump would effectively kibosh the nsa, cia, and fbi... I am not sure. But here is how he would try:

NSA - Appoint Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor. He would bury this in a heartbeat.
CIA - Sworn to secrecy, and hopefully no leaks (good luck with that)
FBI - Appoint Jeff Sessions as AG (who would bury the FBI investigation, or keep it low level and refuse to prosecute anyone)


That is a cover story, an excuse for disseminating and leaking classified NSA surveillance information that was illegally obtained and about citizens whom were illegally unmasked purely for political purposes. It is the FBI that does crime fighting, not the White House. Susan Rice was committing felonies

And again - there is NO EVIDENCE ANYWHERE, of any crimes or collusion to "steal the election" on the part of the Trump people




I am not sure how you call it a cover story. It really happened! Who was appointed National Security Adviser? Who was appointed AG? Both have toes to Russia and both have ties to the Trump admin. It's fact. There is a clear violation of the Logan Act, which is.... (Say it with me....) A CRIME!

The Logan Act states:

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.


Discussing the removal of sanctions in a potential Trump Administration with the Russian Ambassador as the FBI says occurred is a poster child for a violation here.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 6:28:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

The Erik Prince story was reported by Adam Entous, Greg Miller, Kevin Sieff and Karen DeYoung - Sourcing U.S., European AND Arab Officials.

All of whom work for the Washington Post, which was bought by Jeffry Bezos for the express purpose to help elect Hillary Clinton - not exactly a reliable source for factual, nonpartisan information. Openly warring with Trump, rather. And they cited anonymous sources. Nothing verified, no crimes known to have been committed. And where did the officials supposedly get their information... Thats the catch. Obama was illegally spying on the Trump campaign, beginning last October



I appreciate your Jeff Bezos conspiracy theories. Unless you can point to any factual errors in this or ANY story by these writers, your argument is ridiculous at best. Writers cite anonymous sources all the time. As for crimes known to have been committed. How about treason? Their sources (from the US, the UAE and Europe), who have first hand knowledge (keep in mind it was an Emirati who set up the meeting) of the meeting, said that Erik Prince, indicated that he was representing the Trump administration in advancing Russian interests. If such a meeting occurred (as those in a position to know say it did), that is treason.

quote:

Paul Manafort's name was on the f*cking ledger found in Victor Yanukovych's house! Further quoting Manafort's own memo describing his work: “can greatly benefit the Putin Government” and “can re-focus, both internally and externally, the policies of the Putin government.”

President Elect Trump fired Manafort for failing to reveal that he had worked for the Russian billionaire

So what



I am not sure exactly for what he was fired. He worked for the former Ukranian President, as well as Oleg Deripaska, and laundered the money through New York Real Estate deals. The Trump campaign had to have known this when they hired him.

quote:

The Michael Flynn story is well reported and sourced from offcials from several countries including Andrii Artemenko
Wilbur Ross' stake in the Bank Of Cyprus is well known and documented in official documents (he does not deny it)

Flynn is among those who had been illegally surveilled and illegally unmasked by team Obama, which (again) had been using the NSA to illegally spy on the Trump team for political purposes. And again, fired as soon as it was found that he was dishonest to Pence. No crimes are known tom have been committed, except on the part of team Obama



Pure nonsense (in the truest sense of the word). There is ZERO evidence of anyone being illegally surveilled. The NSA routinely surveils individuals it deems to be a threat to national security. No known crimes??? How about violation of the Logan Act. He is KNOWN (by people in a position to know, the FBI HAS the transcript) to discuss sanctions with Sergey Kislyak.

You really need to get your information outside of the right-wing echo chamber.


quote:

Keep in mind, if it were not for Team Obama, and specifically Susan Rice, the evidence would have remained at NSA, and the FBI.

By illegally unmasking American citizens who the Obama team had been using the NSA to spy on, and disseminating the classified documents far and wide \thus ensuring that they would be leaked to Democrat-friendly media such as the Washington Post

Illegal as hell, but not on the part of anyone around Trump. It was Obama who ordered the felonies, and Rice and company who committed the felonies - and its all coming to a head



Again, the same right-wing talking points (I feel like I'm watching Hannity). Who illegally unmasked anyone, and just HOW was it illegal? And what evidence do you have of any of this????

quote:


As for how Trump would effectively kibosh the nsa, cia, and fbi... I am not sure. But here is how he would try:

NSA - Appoint Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor. He would bury this in a heartbeat.
CIA - Sworn to secrecy, and hopefully no leaks (good luck with that)
FBI - Appoint Jeff Sessions as AG (who would bury the FBI investigation, or keep it low level and refuse to prosecute anyone)


That is a cover story, an excuse for disseminating and leaking classified NSA surveillance information that was illegally obtained and about citizens whom were illegally unmasked purely for political purposes. It is the FBI that does crime fighting, not the White House. Susan Rice was committing felonies

And again - there is NO EVIDENCE ANYWHERE, of any crimes or collusion to "steal the election" on the part of the Trump people




I am not sure how you call it a cover story. It really happened! Who was appointed National Security Adviser? Who was appointed AG? Both have toes to Russia and both have ties to the Trump admin. It's fact. There is a clear violation of the Logan Act, which is.... (Say it with me....) A CRIME!

The Logan Act states:

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.


Discussing the removal of sanctions in a potential Trump Administration with the Russian Ambassador as the FBI says occurred is a poster child for a violation here.


I do not appreciate your attributing words to me that I did not post. Please learn how to use the quote system or do not quote me at all.

Why is it so difficult for you to understand that known propagandist's words aren't worth shit? And again, all of the "anonymous sources" is bs. Put your fucking name to it if is supposed to mean something. Any story about anything can be invented using anonymous sources, and when a "news organization" has been openly campaigning for Democrats for years they have no credibility to begin with

Really thought you were better than that

And the Logan Act is quite a reach. Name the last time it was ever used?

Pure propaganda.







WhoreMods -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 6:33:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Why is it so difficult for you to understand that known propagandists words aren't worth shit

[sm=happy-smiley58.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=happy-smiley58.gif]
Are you for real? "Known propagandists" are the only sources you ever cite on here.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 6:42:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Why is it so difficult for you to understand that known propagandists words aren't worth shit

[sm=happy-smiley58.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=happy-smiley58.gif]
Are you for real? "Known propagandists" are the only sources you ever cite on here.


Most alt left trash here are mindless little trolls exactly like you. MJ is among the very few on the left here who even tries to attack a topic

I cite widely varied sources and attack the topic, something you and most of your friends are completely incapable of because your minds are like jello

The very best you can do is troll, and derail topics




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 6:52:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

I cite widely varied sources and attack the topic, something you and most of your friends are completely incapable of because your minds are like jello



Ummmm....

You cited a Daily Caller interview of Joe DiGenova... Really!

This is the right wing activist who has been debunked dozens of times since the 90's.

He was the one who claimed he saw Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky in a compromising position. This was debunked, as it was not possible.
He went on Meet The Press to say that he heard from an unnamed "weekly news org" that Bill Clinton was investigating him.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 7:14:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

I cite widely varied sources and attack the topic, something you and most of your friends are completely incapable of because your minds are like jello



Ummmm....

You cited a Daily Caller interview of Joe DiGenova... Really!

This is the right wing activist who has been debunked dozens of times since the 90's.

He was the one who claimed he saw Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky in a compromising position. This was debunked, as it was not possible.
He went on Meet The Press to say that he heard from an unnamed "weekly news org" that Bill Clinton was investigating him.



ONE of the sources I have cited, among many

You have no problem with the openly biased, HEAVILY biased to the point of propaganda organ, Washington Post so... You are hardly the one to nit pick my citations




mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 8:32:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

I cite widely varied sources and attack the topic, something you and most of your friends are completely incapable of because your minds are like jello



Ummmm....

You cited a Daily Caller interview of Joe DiGenova... Really!

This is the right wing activist who has been debunked dozens of times since the 90's.

He was the one who claimed he saw Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky in a compromising position. This was debunked, as it was not possible.
He went on Meet The Press to say that he heard from an unnamed "weekly news org" that Bill Clinton was investigating him.



ONE of the sources I have cited, among many

You have no problem with the openly biased, HEAVILY biased to the point of propaganda organ, Washington Post so... You are hardly the one to nit pick my citations

Your felchorgan daily caller and your big wet ass to tongue Joey D. aint ever been right about anything.

I heard that as the compound gimp you heard that Il Douchovitch loves the way you suck his ass clean of putinjizz you filthy stinking pantie shitter.

It was of cours "an unnamed source" so one of yours.




BoscoX -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 8:41:37 AM)


The 1950s called, gramps

They want their hysterical homophobia back




mnottertail -> RE: Frog March Obama's Ass (4/6/2017 8:46:04 AM)

will they let you off shift as the compound gimp to fulfill that dream, or are you going to felch your way into heaven (an airport bathroom)?

So far you got nothing but a brain full of PutinJizz, panties full of shit, no sack, a chapped asshole and a mouth full of ancient dingleberries harvested from the ass of Il Douche.

But no facts nor credible evidence.

You go, you retarded fucking toiletlicker.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625