Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Trumps words get him into trouble....


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/2/2017 6:40:25 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the judges ruling was against a motion by trumps lawyers to have the charges dismissed or a rejection of the defendants line of defense, he did not give a ruling that "trump incited violence."

unless im missing something in the reading you have mischaracterized the event.



What part of this do you not grasp?
Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/2/2017 8:41:44 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		what I understand is that "ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a 'direct and proximate result' of trump's actions is not a direct statement or judgment by the judge that "trump incited violence" and since he referred the case to another judge, that it will be up to a jury to decide if trump did indeed do that. thus the headline of your article, "trump MAY have..." and the plaintiffs will have to prove the allegations.

I may be splitting hairs, you might be also, and I very well could be wrong, but its likely going to take a lawyer, a better explanation, or some other article with a bit more definitive language to convince me.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/2/2017 9:15:53 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11300
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the judges ruling was against a motion by trumps lawyers to have the charges dismissed or a rejection of the defendants line of defense, he did not give a ruling that "trump incited violence."

unless im missing something in the reading you have mischaracterized the event.



What part of this do you not grasp?
Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.


The Soros-paid rioters who Trump was discussing were throwing unknown projectiles at him, a dangerous situation. Asking for assistance to defend against assault from paid alt left radicals was well within his rights, and it was a common sense precaution to take

The outrage, he refused to be a victim. Went on the offense instead - repeatedly, and in many different ways. That's one reason we loved the man, he is a fighter rather than a mealy-mouthed RINO

Obama was being stingy with the secret service protection at that time, because he is two-bit scummy little piece of dog shit that way

No class, ever



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 4:44:11 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		The nutsuckers paid rioters who were also nutsuckers were just out pimping pedophiles to our youth.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 5:40:22 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the judges ruling was against a motion by trumps lawyers to have the charges dismissed or a rejection of the defendants line of defense, he did not give a ruling that "trump incited violence."

unless im missing something in the reading you have mischaracterized the event.



What part of this do you not grasp?
Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.


The Soros-paid rioters who Trump was discussing were throwing unknown projectiles at him, a dangerous situation. Asking for assistance to defend against assault from paid alt left radicals was well within his rights, and it was a common sense precaution to take

The outrage, he refused to be a victim. Went on the offense instead - repeatedly, and in many different ways. That's one reason we loved the man, he is a fighter rather than a mealy-mouthed RINO

Obama was being stingy with the secret service protection at that time, because he is two-bit scummy little piece of dog shit that way

No class, ever





Man, you talk about grasping at straws.

The president has no control over secret service protection for presidential candidates, that is strictly a secret service operation without controls placed on it by any one in government, sort of an offshoot of the George Wallace incident.

Secondly, the incident did not involve anyone throwing anything at Donald Trump, in Louisville, even FOX doesnt mention it, so give it a break.

In fact, during the whole campaign only one incident involved anything thrown at Donald Trump, and that was in Iowa.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 5:59:00 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the judges ruling was against a motion by trumps lawyers to have the charges dismissed or a rejection of the defendants line of defense, he did not give a ruling that "trump incited violence."

unless im missing something in the reading you have mischaracterized the event.



What part of this do you not grasp?
Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.


The Soros-paid rioters who Trump was discussing were throwing unknown projectiles at him, a dangerous situation. Asking for assistance to defend against assault from paid alt left radicals was well within his rights, and it was a common sense precaution to take

The outrage, he refused to be a victim. Went on the offense instead - repeatedly, and in many different ways. That's one reason we loved the man, he is a fighter rather than a mealy-mouthed RINO

Obama was being stingy with the secret service protection at that time, because he is two-bit scummy little piece of dog shit that way

No class, ever





Man, you talk about grasping at straws.

The president has no control over secret service protection for presidential candidates, that is strictly a secret service operation without controls placed on it by any one in government, sort of an offshoot of the George Wallace incident.

Secondly, the incident did not involve anyone throwing anything at Donald Trump, in Louisville, even FOX doesnt mention it, so give it a break.

In fact, during the whole campaign only one incident involved anything thrown at Donald Trump, and that was in Iowa.

Maybe the "rioters" were throwing fake shoes at him?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 6:00:13 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11300
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online 		Can you imagine how you poor little crybaby snowflakes would react if someone like Trump sent Koch-paid rioters to disrupt Sanders, Clinton or Obama rallies - then the media propagandized the incidents, by portraying the paid rioters as "victims" with selectively edited video and false narrative fake news articles

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 6:03:35 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		I dont know, they already have, but you snowflakes are absolutely shitting your pants and cockgargling over the fact that the nutsuckers paid nutsuckers to disrupt the Il Douchovitch campaign and derail from the fact that the Russians are your bedmates.

Can you imagine how you poor little snowflake nutsuckers are shitting your pants all the time?

Go to a doctor about the butthurt, you still got obamacare, thanks to the nutsuckers efforts.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 6:04:46 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Can you imagine how you poor little crybaby snowflakes would react if someone like Trump sent Koch-paid rioters to disrupt Sanders, Clinton or Obama rallies - then the media propagandized the incidents, by portraying the paid rioters as "victims" with selectively edited video and false narrative fake news articles

What, you mean like the Koch-funded riot that was staged to illegally stop the Florida recount in 2000?
Or the tea party riots in '08?
Nope, something like that is just unimaginable, isn't it?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 6:07:30 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11300
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Can you imagine how you poor little crybaby snowflakes would react if someone like Trump sent Koch-paid rioters to disrupt Sanders, Clinton or Obama rallies - then the media propagandized the incidents, by portraying the paid rioters as "victims" with selectively edited video and false narrative fake news articles

What, you mean like the Koch-funded riot that was staged to illegally stop the Florida recount in 2000?
Or the tea party riots in '08?
Nope, something like that is just unimaginable, isn't it?


My, little whore boy - you DO have a good imagination



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 6:18:36 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Can you imagine how you poor little crybaby snowflakes would react if someone like Trump sent Koch-paid rioters to disrupt Sanders, Clinton or Obama rallies - then the media propagandized the incidents, by portraying the paid rioters as "victims" with selectively edited video and false narrative fake news articles

What, you mean like the Koch-funded riot that was staged to illegally stop the Florida recount in 2000?
Or the tea party riots in '08?
Nope, something like that is just unimaginable, isn't it?


My, little whore boy - you DO have a good imagination



If you're stupid enough to believe Breitbart's line that any violence or property damage at tea party events was the work of stealth leftists who'd infiltrated the movement to discredit it, it's probably very easy to dismiss anything that clashes with your unexamined assumptions as imagination.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 7:25:38 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Remember the Paul violence at the RNC? These nutsucker goons and thugs are a violent lot.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 8:28:29 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

the judges ruling was against a motion by trumps lawyers to have the charges dismissed or a rejection of the defendants line of defense, he did not give a ruling that "trump incited violence."

unless im missing something in the reading you have mischaracterized the event.



What part of this do you not grasp?
Hale found ample facts supporting allegations that the protesters' injuries were a "direct and proximate result" of Trump's actions, and noted that the Supreme Court has ruled out constitutional protections for speech that incites violence.


On yer knees bitch pray to your gods!

Maybe its time we abolish the creemy supreemies, ya think!




quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


More counterfeit SCROTUM rulings.

The 1st amendment certainly DOES protect the right to say whatever the hell one wants to say.

This is more of the SCROTUMS sleight of hand and constitutional subterfuge by pretending the 'results of free speech' is the same as the 'act of free speech' itself.

Bend over, I hear the train a comin, its rolling round the bend!






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/3/2017 8:32:57 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods





I still dont know what you were talking about, what is a Kike?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/4/2017 3:57:37 AM   
Milesnmiles


Posts: 1349
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
You are just parroting the propaganda you have been fed, blind man

Eating shit sandwiches thinking it's steak

I am constantly amazed at your ability to ignore everything that is going on around you and reduce it all, in your mind, to "propaganda"and thinking that by only using profanity and not any kind of reasoning is going to convince anyone that you are correct and should join you in your blinded lockstep support of Trump.
;-)

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... - 4/4/2017 4:17:11 AM   
Milesnmiles


Posts: 1349
Joined: 12/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Can you imagine how you poor little crybaby snowflakes would react if someone like Trump sent Koch-paid rioters to disrupt Sanders, Clinton or Obama rallies - then the media propagandized the incidents, by portraying the paid rioters as "victims" with selectively edited video and false narrative fake news articles

I know you don't like to open up your mind to consider other possibilities but is it possible that Trump's "violent hate speech" inspired the violence at his rallies all on it's own without outside help. Whereas Sanders, Clinton or Obama's "violent hate speech" at their rallies was not strong enough to be considered actionable, let alone inspire violence.
;-)

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 36
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Trumps words get him into trouble.... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094