Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/4/2017 7:36:46 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
He's just not going anywhere.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/4/2017 8:00:49 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11315
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

His EOs will be overwritten in short order.


The reverse is true great gramps, he is overwriting all of Obama's legacy (EOs)

Now go change your Depends, you stink like old people



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/4/2017 8:01:21 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
If by drain the swamp he means get them all in the administration so they all can be impeached, imprisoned, tried for treason and so on, then hes keeping that promise. guffaws - ye clicked the link too where are the other 100 pages? Bit light that one ;)

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/4/2017 8:08:46 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

His EOs will be overwritten in short order.


The reverse is true great gramps, he is overwriting all of Obama's legacy (EOs)

Now go change your Depends, you stink like old people



your bad breath is blowing back in your face from the stinking PutinJizz you have been felchgobbling, you are old and retarded, and you gobble great bowls of nutsucker dick, but the EOs of Il Douchovitch will be overwritten.

Go tongue some airport bathroom ass, clean out your syphilitic brain.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/4/2017 8:31:11 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Ah sorry snowflake boscox - are you disputing the editorial as lies?

Donald Trump Contradicting Himself Tremendously I totally lost bladder control at $2700 ( i thought the supreme court voted 5/4 no limits from billionaires etc) first cli p i clicked on i can find more current ones if I actually thought people like boscox would actually watch/read them....their brain rejects that, they have been heavily programmed that way, you know - so in essence they will not watch/read/absorb/process etc...if some of you ever wondered. They reject relaity and substitute it with their own - or what theve been programmed to accept

and for giggles let see election rigged counts darkies etc oo this one Reporter called out Trump Electoral College lie in real time at press conference


Donald Trump destroyed by Stephen Colbert "if ivanka wasnt my daughter perhaps I would be dating her" - sick fuk...my daughter is beautiful and intelligent etc acceptable


< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 4/4/2017 8:35:48 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/6/2017 4:09:42 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
A few excerpts:
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-trumps-war-on-journalism/

In Donald Trump’s America, the mere act of reporting news unflattering to the president is held up as evidence of bias. Journalists are slandered as “enemies of the people.”

Facts that contradict Trump’s version of reality are dismissed as “fake news.” Reporters and their news organizations are “pathetic,” “very dishonest,” “failing,” and even, in one memorable turn of phrase, "a pile of garbage.”

Most presidents, irritated as they may have been, have continued to acknowledge — at least publicly — that an independent press plays an essential role in American democracy.
Trump doesn’t seem to buy it. On his very first day in office, he called journalists “among the most dishonest human beings on earth.”

Since then he has regularly condemned legitimate reporting as “fake news.” His administration has blocked mainstream news organizations, including The Times, from briefings and his secretary of State chose to travel to Asia without taking the press corps, breaking a longtime tradition.

This may seem like bizarre behavior from a man who consumes the news in print and on television so voraciously and who is in many ways a product of the media. He comes from reality TV, from talk radio with Howard Stern, from the gossip pages of the New York City tabloids, for whose columnists he was both a regular subject and a regular source.

But Trump’s strategy is pretty clear: By branding reporters as liars, he apparently hopes to discredit, disrupt or bully into silence anyone who challenges his version of reality. By undermining trust in news organizations and delegitimizing journalism and muddling the facts so that Americans no longer know who to believe, he can deny and distract and help push his administration’s far-fetched storyline.

It’s a cynical strategy, with some creepy overtones. For instance, when he calls journalists “enemies of the people,” Trump (whether he knows it or not) echoes Josef Stalin and other despots.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/6/2017 5:40:25 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

Trump has a long way to go before he's even close to a "war on journalism".

FDR's War Against the Press

Roosevelt's intimidation efforts reached their apogee in the hands of the Special Senate Committee on Lobbying. The president indirectly recruited Sen. Hugo L. Black (D–Ala.), a zealous and effective New Deal loyalist, as chair. The committee's original mission was to probe the opposition campaign to the "death sentence" in the Public Utility Holding Company Bill, a provision that would have allowed, under certain circumstances, the dissolution of utility holding companies. The Black Committee gained traction with the public when it brought to light evidence that some lobbyists had concocted thousands of "fake telegrams" sent to Congress to protest the bill. Smelling blood, Black expanded the investigation into a general probe of anti–New Deal voices, including journalists.

The Treasury granted Black access to tax returns dating back to 1925 of such critics as David Lawrence of the United States News. Then he moved to obtain his targets' private telegrams, demanding that telegraph companies let the committee search copies of all incoming and outgoing telegrams for the first nine months of 1935. When Western Union refused on privacy grounds, the FCC, at Black's urging, ordered it to comply.

Over a nearly three-month period at the end of 1935, FCC and Black Committee staffers searched great stacks of telegrams in Western Union's D.C. office. Operating with virtually no restriction, they read the communications of sundry lobbyists, newspaper publishers, and conservative political activists as well as every member of Congress. Writing to Black, one investigator stated that they had gone through "35,000 to 50,000 per day." Various newspapers and members of Congress later estimated that staffers had examined some five million telegrams over the course of the investigation. In 2017, this would be akin to staffers from a congressional committee and the FCC teaming up at the headquarters of Google and Yahoo! and then spending months secretly searching emails.


K.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/6/2017 5:43:36 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
I'm not sure closing in or on his record or even getting any closer is a good thing.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/6/2017 5:55:17 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

I'm not sure closing in or on his record or even getting any closer is a good thing.

There is that.

K.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/6/2017 8:48:47 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11315
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

A few excerpts:
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-ed-trumps-war-on-journalism/

In Donald Trump’s America, the mere act of reporting news unflattering to the president is held up as evidence of bias. Journalists are slandered as “enemies of the people.”

Facts that contradict Trump’s version of reality are dismissed as “fake news.” Reporters and their news organizations are “pathetic,” “very dishonest,” “failing,” and even, in one memorable turn of phrase, "a pile of garbage.”

Most presidents, irritated as they may have been, have continued to acknowledge — at least publicly — that an independent press plays an essential role in American democracy.
Trump doesn’t seem to buy it. On his very first day in office, he called journalists “among the most dishonest human beings on earth.”

Since then he has regularly condemned legitimate reporting as “fake news.” His administration has blocked mainstream news organizations, including The Times, from briefings and his secretary of State chose to travel to Asia without taking the press corps, breaking a longtime tradition.

This may seem like bizarre behavior from a man who consumes the news in print and on television so voraciously and who is in many ways a product of the media. He comes from reality TV, from talk radio with Howard Stern, from the gossip pages of the New York City tabloids, for whose columnists he was both a regular subject and a regular source.

But Trump’s strategy is pretty clear: By branding reporters as liars, he apparently hopes to discredit, disrupt or bully into silence anyone who challenges his version of reality. By undermining trust in news organizations and delegitimizing journalism and muddling the facts so that Americans no longer know who to believe, he can deny and distract and help push his administration’s far-fetched storyline.

It’s a cynical strategy, with some creepy overtones. For instance, when he calls journalists “enemies of the people,” Trump (whether he knows it or not) echoes Josef Stalin and other despots.


The press is no longer really independent, for the most part they are leftist political operatives who work very closely with the Democrat party and with other leftists embedded within the government

Those are your creepy overtones right there, there's your real Stalinism too

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/7/2017 4:44:25 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
I'm sure your insistent partisan focus makes it appear that way to you.

In reality, there's a mess all the way around.

But as usual, instead of addressing the points, you go for ad hominem and red herring and straw man, leaving the points the LA Times makes unopposed.

Other than "Nuh-uh."

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/13/2017 12:17:27 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
More on the Liar-in-Chief:

It was bad enough back in 2011 when Donald Trump began peddling the crackpot conspiracy theory that President Barack Obama was not a native-born American. But at least Trump was just a private citizen then.

By the time he tweeted last month that Obama had sunk so low as to “tapp [sic] my phones during the very sacred election process,” Trump was a sitting president accusing a predecessor of what would have been an impeachable offense.

Become a subscriber today to support editorial writing like this. Start getting full access to our signature journalism for just 99 cents for the first four weeks.

Trump went public with this absurd accusation without consulting the law enforcement and intelligence officials who would have disabused him of a conspiracy theory he apparently imbibed from right-wing media. After the FBI director debunked it, Trump held fast, claiming he hadn’t meant that he had been literally wiretapped.

Most people know by now that the new president of the United States trafficks in untruths and half-truths, and that his word cannot be taken at face value.

Even more troubling, though, is that much of his misinformation is of the creepiest kind. Implausible conspiracy theories from fly-by-night websites; unsubstantiated speculations from supermarket tabloids. Bigoted stories he may have simply made up; stuff he heard on TV talk shows.

The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 6, 2012
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2016
This is pathetic, but it’s also alarming. If Trump feels free to take to Twitter to make wild, paranoid, unsubstantiated accusations against his predecessor, why should the nation believe what he says about a North Korean missile test, Russian troop movements in Europe or a natural disaster in the United States?

Trump’s willingness to embrace unproven, conspiratorial and even racist theories became clear during the campaign, when he repeatedly told tall tales that seemed to reinforce ugly stereotypes about minorities. Take his now famous assertion that he watched thousands of people in “a heavy Arab population” in New Jersey cheer the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11, an astonishing account that no one has been able to verify. PolitiFact rated that as “Pants on Fire.”

Or his retweeting of a bogus crime statistic purporting to show that 81% of white homicide victims are killed by blacks. (The correct figure was 15%.)

On several occasions he retweeted white nationalists. (Remember the image of Hillary Clinton and the star of David, for instance?)

His engagement with, to put it politely, out-of-the-mainstream ideas has attracted some strange bedfellows. It may not be fair to attribute to his senior aide, Steve Bannon, all the views that were published on the controversial alt-right site Breitbart.com, of which Bannon was the executive chairman. But it is certainly fair to wonder why Trump has elevated to a senior West Wing position a man who has trafficked in nonsense, bigotry and rank speculation.

Of course it was widely hoped that when Trump came into office he would put the conspiracy theories and red-meat scare stories behind him. Perhaps the “lock her up” mantra and the fear-mongering about Mexican rapists and the racial dog whistles and the assertions about Ted Cruz’s father’s connection to Lee Harvey Oswald — perhaps all that was just part of a cynical bid for votes, and it would go away when the election was over.

But there’s no sign of that. Trump seems as willing to mouth off today as he was on the campaign — about wiretaps, inauguration crowds, fraudulent voters, you name it. And the problem with that is that he is no longer a blowhard TV personality or a raunchy guest on Howard Stern or a self-promoting real estate magnate or even a long-shot candidate for the Republican nomination. He’s now the president of the United States, and he is allowing the credibility of his unimaginably powerful office to be exploited and wasted on crackpot ideas that have been rightly discredited by politicians from both parties.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/13/2017 12:25:01 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
hes just a flop who likes to flip?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump - 4/14/2017 7:45:58 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
I don't think he has any clear idea of what he wants. And to the degree he does, it keeps changing.

And to the degree it doesn't change, he keeps learning it's either unconstitutional or that it's more complicated than that.

Or that the GOP Congress can't reach a consensus about it.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 54
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: LA Times Editorial Board runs scathing series on Trump Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094