Nnanji
Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX Any questions Interesting graphs... I will admit, I am not 100% certain what some of them are depicting. But I'll bet you're not going to let that stop you making comments on them. Top to bottom: The top one APPEARS to display CO2 levels and Temperature (or the derivative over time in temperature), hence the delta?). It is based on MILLIONS of years before present. BTW: What happened to the Creationist Republicans who claim anyone who has utilized a scientific method to establish that the earth is ANY older than 5000 years is a leftist propagandist? There you go howling the extent of your ability to understand the graphs or the context of the discussion. For your information those Creationist Republicans were trying to get laid by the girls that had "COEXIST" bumper stickers on their car. Maybe you should try that. It might be educational for you. Anyway, I digress. On par with what we expect from you. First of all, man made climate change, caused by the creation of greenhouse gasses will not harm the earth. It will just make it more difficult for humans to survive on the earth. The earth will shake us off like gnats and be just fine. Citation please? Notice, in the first (top graph) on the RIGHT side (the part where HUMANS are) and the hockey stick representing CO2. Notice the Temp (or Delta in Temp) going up as well? Yes, I see that and I see it in several other places. In fact I see it go up and down. Generally, it always goes up after it been down for a while. It looks pretty down there so I'd assume it would go up. As it did that on several places on the graph, before people, I wonder what other factors, besides people, made it do similar...and opposite...things in those places? OK... On to the next graph. This one APPEARS to show global temperature. Again look to the right side of it, where the humans are. See the orange area getting larger over time? I see very large orange areas in other places before people. I also see some of the largest blue (cold) periods recently. It appears on the graph that the recent orange area are recovering from a lot of blue area. Why do you think that is? You keep mentioning that ide where humans are and totally ignoring other shapes of the graph more extreme or that the area where humans are might just be where a normal warming might happen after a little ice age. Why is that? ok The next 4 Top left graph CO2 emissions. There is our hockey stick again. (It's like straight out of inconvenient truth) Which has been totally debunked, but hey, you admit you know nothing about which you are talking. Top Right graph. People are living longer nowadays. Why yes they are! (So?) Bottom left graph. People are producing more nowadays. Why yes they are! (So?) Bottom Right graph. There are far more people on the earth nowadays. Why yes there are!!! (So?) Ah I get it!!! The hockey stick, that has been debunked, is all that's really important to you. I must say, you are a true science fiend. You can grasp the pertinent nugget just like that. So maybe, people living longer, and producing more, and far more of them, produces far more greenhouse gasses like CO2? Oh an BTW, by these VERY graphs show that CO2 and Temperature are both rising starting when humans started appearing on the earth? That's not actually true is it? I'm sure Al Gore would interprit it that way in his movie. But, his movie has been ajudicated to be fantasy. So, perhaps there's other interpritations that would be more reasonable. Like an ice age ended where there had been some of the coldest climate on record and the world was going back to normal. boscox. It looks like you made Al Gore's point better then he ever could! Wow! Is that what you see? Maybe you should recuse yourself on the grounds of being a dumbass!
|