mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
|
a is at 5 miles /4 seconds, <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< note the time interval you fucking retard, it is an imaginary point and it is not accurate, nor is it instantaneous it is an average point, it is only close enough for the girls sentient beings go out with (this excludes morons such as yourself). you might consider the heisenberg uncertainty principle, but you dont understand that either.
again, instantaneous and point have meanings. You may not violate physics, mathematics, nor reality.
English is an imperfect language, and you are assigning work to words that they were not meant to do.
The reason that the result of a division by zero is undefined is the fact that any attempt at a definition leads to a contradiction.
To begin with, how do we define division? The ratio r of two numbers a and b:
r=a/b
is that number r that satisfies
a=r*b.
Well, if b=0, i.e., we are trying to divide by zero, we have to find a number r such that
r*0=a. (1)
But
r*0=0
for all numbers r, and so unless a=0 there is no solution of equation (1).
You may give us credible university citations on why dividing by zero is ok.
Arguing that division by zero is anything other than NaN even has those who have only completed from around 7th to 9th grade understanding that you are an hysterical retard, RealZeroRetard.
You aint confusing nobody, just getting your ass handed to you (the norm) and shitting your pants (the norm) and being demonstrated to be the idiot buffoon you are (the norm).
points in physics btw:
Point object is an expression used in kinematics: it is an object whose dimensions are ignored or neglected while considering its motion.
A point object refers to a tiny object which is calculated or counted as dot object to simplyfy the calculations. A real object can rotate as it moves. For example, a ball will be spinning while it is moving in a trajectory. Also, a body - for example, a falling water drop - may vibrate as it moves, These complications can be avoided by considering the motion of a very small body called a point object.
Mathematically, a particle is treated as just a point, an object without extension, so that rotational and vibrational motions are not involved.
Actually, there is no such thing in nature as an object without extension. The concept of a particle or a point object is very useful because real objects often behave to a great extent, like particles. A body need not be 'small' in the usual sense of the word, in order to be treated as a particle.
For example, if we consider the distance from the Earth to the sun, with respect to the distance between them, both the Earth and the sun can be treated as point objects. We can find out a great deal about the motion of the sun, planets and other celestial bodies, without appreciable error, by treating these bodies as particles.
Thus, any object can be treated as a point object if it covers distances which are much greater in comparison to its size.
so dimension is ignored in the equations, as is the dimension of time it is misplaced, and the +- of the time dimension and the distance dimension depend on what was being used to measure, if you were doing the 1 chimpanzee, 2 chimpanzee method to determine seconds you could be off a great deal, yet I could not imagine you being any more sentient than that. I say you have a nice cartoon there again that is meaningless.
Your graph is off; a is to the right of its placement and below, of course if there would have been a point there, or to anything you are drooling............
< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/8/2017 11:48:55 PM >
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|
RE: Science anarchists - 
Profile
You are fucking brilliant in your wildest fantasy no doubt.
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread