Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Science anarchists


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Science anarchists Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:44:47 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		How can they be found if they were instantly atomised dumbfuknth..Or are you inferring the Zionists scattered them about a bit so they could dance over body bits atoms.

I am not disputing the two brains cells but that is still easily treble yours thicko.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 301
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:49:52 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		who said instantly? you? Witto Dickee? not me. Same inability to comprehend what was said, read it again, for comprehension this time.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 302
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:51:20 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline 		Bah! Your own words betray you. Here you are using in words a relativistic calculus for defining instantaneous in your own time frame.

The cutting speed of an oxy/cety torch isnt even in the same universe but if you wanna talk closer to instant there you have it, keep in mind this one cuts slow compared to the real mCcoy.

You excrete such a rainbow of bullshit that sooner or later you will contradict yourself.



_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 303
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:51:20 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		Why the hell are some of you lot arguing over instantaneously anyway.

Bit like arguing over big soon now, etc

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 304
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:53:29 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Why the hell are some of you lot arguing over instantaneously anyway.

Bit like arguing over big soon now, etc


It is an exercise of uselessly counting angels on the head of a pin.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 305
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:54:18 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		I cant help that you are too slow to follow anything, without seeing the conspiracy is coming to get me, dullard1 paranoid much?

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 306
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:56:56 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		I did scroll a back couple pages but got bored - all em quotes, quotes of quotes, quotes of quotes of quotes etc to find out who the pedantic little shit was - who was it by the way?

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 307
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 7:59:49 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Bah! Your own words betray you. Here you are using in words a relativistic calculus for defining instantaneous in your own time frame.

The cutting speed of an oxy/cety torch isnt even in the same universe but if you wanna talk closer to instant there you have it, keep in mind this one cuts slow compared to the real mCcoy.

You excrete such a rainbow of bullshit that sooner or later you will contradict yourself.





nope you fail to comprehend the meaning of instantaneous as its used in physics despite it was explained to you in great detail. My usage is not relativistic in any way since instantaneous in the physics world is from my experience zero time, and smaller time intervals are 'closer' to zero time ffs. I told you I would concede the point if you can come up with any kind of university paper to the contrary, meaning that matches your relativistic approach. Seems snotty couldnt do it, so knock yourself out.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 308
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:02:24 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Why the hell are some of you lot arguing over instantaneously anyway.

Bit like arguing over big soon now, etc


It is an exercise of uselessly counting angels on the head of a pin.


wrong it was a correction of your politicized physics.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 309
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:05:39 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

I cant help that you are too slow to follow anything, without seeing the conspiracy is coming to get me, dullard1 paranoid much?

why dont you spend some quality time with your Witto Dickee, Witto Dickee.

I dont recall mentioning a conspiracy, care to expalin your latest conspiracy theory so we can all get on the same page here?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 310
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:08:22 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		was it you dumbfuk1?

I got as far back as when someone was talking about water (its not the only substance to have a triple point)
http://www.dummies.com/education/science/chemistry/the-unusual-properties-of-water-molecules/ - no shame I actually forget a lot

Matter is empty space, how much exactly -- 99.99999999.....%

matter/heat/energy - is basically the same shit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RDocoSWqPY

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 311
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:11:15 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		ok Witto Dickee so you have given up on all that and now you want try making hay by talking about other stuff?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 312
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:14:33 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Bah! Your own words betray you. Here you are using in words a relativistic calculus for defining instantaneous in your own time frame.

The cutting speed of an oxy/cety torch isnt even in the same universe but if you wanna talk closer to instant there you have it, keep in mind this one cuts slow compared to the real mCcoy.

You excrete such a rainbow of bullshit that sooner or later you will contradict yourself.





nope you fail to comprehend the meaning of instantaneous as its used in physics despite it was explained to you in great detail. My usage is not relativistic in any way since instantaneous in the physics world is from my experience zero time, and smaller time intervals are 'closer' to zero time ffs. I told you I would concede the point if you can come up with any kind of university paper to the contrary, meaning that matches your relativistic approach. Seems snotty couldnt do it, so knock yourself out.




Sorry RealZeroRetard. Instantaneous is used in physics to describe observations in single frames of reference as well, where the 'apparent' observation of timeslice is zero (ie speed of light.

RealZeroRetard never gets anything right. That has been demonstrated continuously and pervasively.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 313
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:26:22 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		As long as its means not having listing to your codswallop I am all for it witless1

Was witto wicked the best you could come up with ffs. I am not trying for that.

Not that I have a clue what you are on about anyway all I read was instantaneous and something about water and ice and was curious as to why we were talking about that.

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 5/8/2017 8:38:18 AM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 314
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:38:39 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Bah! Your own words betray you. Here you are using in words a relativistic calculus for defining instantaneous in your own time frame.

The cutting speed of an oxy/cety torch isnt even in the same universe but if you wanna talk closer to instant there you have it, keep in mind this one cuts slow compared to the real mCcoy.

You excrete such a rainbow of bullshit that sooner or later you will contradict yourself.





nope you fail to comprehend the meaning of instantaneous as its used in physics despite it was explained to you in great detail. My usage is not relativistic in any way since instantaneous in the physics world is from my experience zero time, and smaller time intervals are 'closer' to zero time ffs. I told you I would concede the point if you can come up with any kind of university paper to the contrary, meaning that matches your relativistic approach. Seems snotty couldnt do it, so knock yourself out.




Sorry RealZeroRetard. Instantaneous is used in physics to describe observations in single frames of reference as well, where the 'apparent' observation of timeslice is zero (ie speed of light.

RealZeroRetard never gets anything right. That has been demonstrated continuously and pervasively.



apparent zero at the speed of light, thats a great load of bullshit snotty, however I am not interested in snotty thereoms of fail, still no university paper eh?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 315
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:41:52 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

apparent zero at the speed of light, thats a great load of bullshit snotty, however I am not interested in snotty thereoms of fail, still no university paper eh?

You can blather about university papers once you've done the history homework you've been putting off for three months.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 316
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:44:20 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		but I already exposed your hypocrisy countless times.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 317
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:47:28 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
but I already exposed your hypocrisy countless times.

No, you keep trotting a forgery that's been debunked in two different courts of law as proof of something that you've been otherwise unable to find a scrap of evidence for.
Not quite the same thing.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 318
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:51:48 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Bah! Your own words betray you. Here you are using in words a relativistic calculus for defining instantaneous in your own time frame.

The cutting speed of an oxy/cety torch isnt even in the same universe but if you wanna talk closer to instant there you have it, keep in mind this one cuts slow compared to the real mCcoy.

You excrete such a rainbow of bullshit that sooner or later you will contradict yourself.





nope you fail to comprehend the meaning of instantaneous as its used in physics despite it was explained to you in great detail. My usage is not relativistic in any way since instantaneous in the physics world is from my experience zero time, and smaller time intervals are 'closer' to zero time ffs. I told you I would concede the point if you can come up with any kind of university paper to the contrary, meaning that matches your relativistic approach. Seems snotty couldnt do it, so knock yourself out.




Sorry RealZeroRetard. Instantaneous is used in physics to describe observations in single frames of reference as well, where the 'apparent' observation of timeslice is zero (ie speed of light.

RealZeroRetard never gets anything right. That has been demonstrated continuously and pervasively.



apparent zero at the speed of light, thats a great load of bullshit snotty, however I am not interested in snotty thereoms of fail, still no university paper eh?

What do you have for RealZeroRetard retard university theorems? Oh, all of them. I am not interested in your continuous retarded untutored cockgargling, still no actual evidence and credible citations, only asswipe as always huh?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 319
RE: Science anarchists - 5/8/2017 8:54:07 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline 		We all know your interested in your own felch gargling and the only snotty thereom that has been found to be correct is 'snotty failure'.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 320
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Science anarchists Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141