RE: Science anarchists (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 10:02:59 AM)

I get it, you are still trying to pound square pegs in round holes [8|]

what is the diameter of a point for 200



Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 10:11:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer this means "whole" numbers dear readers

Christ I just explained why they don't truly exist. Whom off you two first tried to be smart and used the term instantaneous - is to blame. You can argue that that word should not really exist.

Anyhoos we need a good global warming thread, or wicked is a bit daft thread. Ah that’s why I started this thread that orange nutjob in the white house and the fact that scientists need to be perceived as more than fake news, witches etc and felt the need to demonstrate against a lying clueless fuk of a president who declares them so




why dont you talk about failed brit politics in your own back yard?

Demobcratic Dictatorships Legislative Exploitation Message to America

http://www.collarchat.com/m_5028595/tm.htm



tamaka -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 10:23:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

they are not arbitrary, in no way are they random or whim, they are based on reason and system.




They are useful measurements for us but a measurement is not something that exists by itself.



mnottertail -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 10:29:26 AM)

rather what I have been saying. and we must always know that forever our measurements will be approximations.



Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 11:01:09 AM)

great start a thread if you want to imagine shit, I didnt put up any approximations.



mnottertail -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 11:13:22 AM)

you certainly did. nothing but. Except all those times where you posted absolutely nothing which was a great number of times, and then all the times you drooled some stupid, meaningless shit, so.......



Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 11:44:40 AM)

well snotty massenfelchingarglin, if a point is not an integer then tell us the diameter of the fucking point already. I never said or implied at any time there was a rangenjizzin or domaininsuckinrung. There I even translated it to snottygargle for you



mnottertail -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 12:15:27 PM)

0.00000000000000000000000000000003 femtoseconds (not an integer)

What do integers have to do with points exactly?

consider a sine wave graph, and where its points lie.

Thanks for playing, you lose again.



Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 12:19:02 PM)

lets not consider a damn thing other than the example I gave, the numbers are 4 and 5 NOT
4.00000000000000000000000000000003 or 5.00000000000000000000000000000003, or 4 +/- 0.00000000000000000000000000000003 or 5 +/-0.00000000000000000000000000000003 or 4 divided by 5 or any other such shit as you and vince are peddling.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 12:21:12 PM)

Tell me, nay us all, where is my backyard you rabid jackal



Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 12:23:39 PM)

conficious said, if it was up your ass you'd know [:D]



mnottertail -> RE: Science anarchists (5/15/2017 12:49:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

lets not consider a damn thing other than the example I gave, the numbers are 4 and 5 NOT
4.00000000000000000000000000000003 or 5.00000000000000000000000000000003, or 4 +/- 0.00000000000000000000000000000003 or 5 +/-0.00000000000000000000000000000003 or 4 divided by 5 or any other such shit as you and vince are peddling.



in the imaginary world they are the numbers. However that is not the cockgargling you are cockgargling, they were 5 meters or miles and 4 seconds.

to what accuracy? how badly is the point smeared in reality?

And we gave up that cartoon after you said some stupid shit surrounding it (which is everything) and you think I been talking about that all along here?

Nope not that it matters, but you posted no integer at 5, 4 you posted measurements at 5,4.

Arbitrary as you say. No rhyme or reason. And certainly no accuracy. since they are integer measurements they are accurate to +- 0.5 thats a pretty big point.



Real0ne -> RE: Science anarchists (5/16/2017 9:27:34 AM)

looks like you understand math as well as german and welding, if a point is larger than the value of the number then it is no longer that number hence an integer cannot exist. Yes you have little imaginary goblins running around in that vacant head of yours. Drool on felchgarglinrungenmassen



Page: <<   < prev  19 20 21 22 [23]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.492188E-02