Awareness
Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Awareness The rate of female rulers is irrelevant. Why? It's a math thing. You wouldn't understand. quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness I presume you don't understand probability, statistics or math. This is unsurprising. It's a common failing amongst feminists. It seems also to be a failing of yours also No. It's not. Why on earth would you say something so stupid? quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness The original paper can be found here: http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Queens_Oct2015.pdf The authors are Oeindrila Dube and S.P. Harish. Oeindrila is a political scientist (a real one, not a wannabe like Peon), has a Master of Philosophy in economics from Oxford and a PhD in public policy from Harvard. S.P Harish is a Postdoctoral Fellow in Global Governance. They're both essentially left-leaning academics who are more likely to be looking to bolster claims of gender inequality than otherwise. Frankly, I think their contentions are probably substantially more well-considered than your own. quote:
This would seem to imply that you do not normally post frankly. No. It doesn't. Is English your second language? quote:
Your need to sputter incoherently in opposition to any conclusion which doesn't support your beliefs is beyond amusing. Yes, this applies so well to you too. This is truly a multi-use statement. I'm very proud of it.
_____________________________
Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.
|