RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/10/2017 9:10:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Now who is distorting.
When you engage in this kind of debating all you are doing is agreeing with them but you what a way out when you get cornered.
There has been police brutality, I never said there wasn't.
I have said nothing about Miranda, forget smokescreens.
I still say when you go after the department in a case like this it is counterproductive. It encourages coverups if they still get burned when they go after a bad cop.
You know as well as I do that tort law is totally screwed up.


A VERY, VERY high percentages of murder criminal cases against cops are rarely resolved against the officer, especially when a black man is the victim and even if the victim is shown on video running away when shot in the back.

Tort law is their only alternative.

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.

When you can get 3 million for getting burned you know tort law needs reforming.
And cops get sued when they are innocent and they are ruined for nothing more than doing their job.
In Ferguson the cop was driven out of law enforcement even after Holders DOJ who even after going there to get him declared him innocent.
Tort law is just annother tool to harrass cops, not to gain justice.




mnottertail -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/11/2017 5:08:14 AM)

why does that mean tort needs reform. Whats burning up a human being worth to a welfare patient?




thompsonx -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/11/2017 6:20:44 AM)


ORIGINAL: BamaD

When you can get 3 million for getting burned you know tort law needs reforming.
And cops get sued when they are innocent and they are ruined for nothing more than doing their job.
In Ferguson the cop was driven out of law enforcement even after Holders DOJ who even after going there to get him declared him innocent.
Tort law is just annother tool to harrass cops, not to gain justice.


You are another one of those lying sacks of shit that only read part of one report. The city of furgistan and the cops were shown to be guilty and several were sacked as a result.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid




itsSIRtou -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/11/2017 7:35:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Now who is distorting.
When you engage in this kind of debating all you are doing is agreeing with them but you what a way out when you get cornered.
There has been police brutality, I never said there wasn't.
I have said nothing about Miranda, forget smokescreens.
I still say when you go after the department in a case like this it is counterproductive. It encourages coverups if they still get burned when they go after a bad cop.
You know as well as I do that tort law is totally screwed up.


A VERY, VERY high percentages of murder criminal cases against cops are rarely resolved against the officer, especially when a black man is the victim and even if the victim is shown on video running away when shot in the back.

Tort law is their only alternative.

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.

That's because many times its because cops have the choice to use less deadly means to stop an UNARMED man, but odds are Black Men get a bullet instead.

but then we see a fleeing white man in that same city breaks into a house and shoots at the cops for hours and they work really hard to "peacefully" take him into custody? yea, we have issues with that uneven use of force.

cops know if there's nobody looking or catching them on video, their word will win out, even if they are lying their ass off, even if the coroner has concrete evidence what the officer says is a lie.

That one cop thought he was home free by planting his extra gun on the man he shot 8 times in the back running away from him,

the only way he's in jail for murder IS because he got seen on video shooting AND planting the gun on the dying man.

And no matter what the proof ur first reaction is to never accept that the cop is even possibly guilty.

And even with video evidence, u would more willingly find an excuse for that violence, than say the cop IS guilty of murder.





itsSIRtou -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/11/2017 7:53:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Now who is distorting.
When you engage in this kind of debating all you are doing is agreeing with them but you what a way out when you get cornered.
There has been police brutality, I never said there wasn't.
I have said nothing about Miranda, forget smokescreens.
I still say when you go after the department in a case like this it is counterproductive. It encourages coverups if they still get burned when they go after a bad cop.
You know as well as I do that tort law is totally screwed up.


A VERY, VERY high percentages of murder criminal cases against cops are rarely resolved against the officer, especially when a black man is the victim and even if the victim is shown on video running away when shot in the back.

Tort law is their only alternative.

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.

When you can get 3 million for getting burned you know tort law needs reforming.
And cops get sued when they are innocent and they are ruined for nothing more than doing their job.
In Ferguson the cop was driven out of law enforcement even after Holders DOJ who even after going there to get him declared him innocent.
Tort law is just annother tool to harrass cops, not to gain justice.


I bet u didn't use that same argument when OJ Simpson got sued by the victims parents even after he was declared flat out innocent of murder too did u?

but of course, THATS different how exactly?







vincentML -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/11/2017 10:31:14 AM)

quote:

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.


I never said that Bama. Can you tell me what leads you to make such a silly accusation?




WickedsDesire -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/11/2017 4:47:19 PM)

What happened to the head of the FBI and why?




vincentML -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/12/2017 5:19:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

What happened to the head of the FBI and why?

It is an awesome political circus, innit? But different thread, my friend.




BoscoX -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/12/2017 5:51:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

And let BLM and their entire Gang, be the Police, and see if they can do a much better job of policing and protecting?


As was stated so well above, BLM says that all lives matter, theirs as much as others.

BLM, these are mothers and fathers and daughters and sons fearful of wayward police violence. And it is this kind of thug, gang, rapist, characterization that slanders people who are out trying to better their lives and the lives of their children. Shame on you, Greta.

Then why to the get mad when anyone says all lives matter?

My guess is they get mad because the counter slogan ignores what has been happening to black men at the hands of American Justice. An unarmed black man is much more likely to be shot dead by a cop. Some cities like Manhattan abused the "stop and frisk" programs. And the degree of black incarceration is a scandal.

I incorrectly identified the Black Panther activist Bobby Seale as Bobby Steel in post 43.


Because they are unhinged radicals and a term such as "all lives matter" only further enrages them





BamaD -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/12/2017 6:45:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Now who is distorting.
When you engage in this kind of debating all you are doing is agreeing with them but you what a way out when you get cornered.
There has been police brutality, I never said there wasn't.
I have said nothing about Miranda, forget smokescreens.
I still say when you go after the department in a case like this it is counterproductive. It encourages coverups if they still get burned when they go after a bad cop.
You know as well as I do that tort law is totally screwed up.


A VERY, VERY high percentages of murder criminal cases against cops are rarely resolved against the officer, especially when a black man is the victim and even if the victim is shown on video running away when shot in the back.

Tort law is their only alternative.

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.

That's because many times its because cops have the choice to use less deadly means to stop an UNARMED man, but odds are Black Men get a bullet instead.

but then we see a fleeing white man in that same city breaks into a house and shoots at the cops for hours and they work really hard to "peacefully" take him into custody? yea, we have issues with that uneven use of force.

cops know if there's nobody looking or catching them on video, their word will win out, even if they are lying their ass off, even if the coroner has concrete evidence what the officer says is a lie.

That one cop thought he was home free by planting his extra gun on the man he shot 8 times in the back running away from him,

the only way he's in jail for murder IS because he got seen on video shooting AND planting the gun on the dying man.

And no matter what the proof ur first reaction is to never accept that the cop is even possibly guilty.

And even with video evidence, u would more willingly find an excuse for that violence, than say the cop IS guilty of murder.



BS, I lean toward the cops because when all the facts come in it usually favors them.
However there have been several incidents where I have done the opposite.
The female deputy in OK, the shooting in MN, (the first thing to come out was the video), and the case from last week when the passenger was shot in the back while leaving the scene of to loud a party.
It would seem that what happens is you manage to forget when I condemn the cop.




BamaD -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/12/2017 6:49:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.


I never said that Bama. Can you tell me what leads you to make such a silly accusation?

Tell me when on any of our threads you have seen enough evedence to back the cop.
There is always the chance that I have made the same mistake that I just pointed out someone making about me.




BoscoX -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/12/2017 3:37:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.


I never said that Bama. Can you tell me what leads you to make such a silly accusation?

Tell me when on any of our threads you have seen enough evedence to back the cop.
There is always the chance that I have made the same mistake that I just pointed out someone making about me.


You aren't expecting a reply to this from him, are you? [:D]




BamaD -> RE: Black Lives Matter Terrorists Are Real Winners (5/12/2017 3:55:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

And no matter what the proof you never accept that the cop is innocent.


I never said that Bama. Can you tell me what leads you to make such a silly accusation?

Tell me when on any of our threads you have seen enough evedence to back the cop.
There is always the chance that I have made the same mistake that I just pointed out someone making about me.


You aren't expecting a reply to this from him, are you? [:D]

Of course not.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875