Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: LGBTK?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: LGBTK? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:02:53 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up,
you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant.
And thats why you arent citing my posts that show
quote:



You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious.


You only hate.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:05:37 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up,
you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant.
And thats why you arent citing my posts that show
quote:



You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious.




Lucy, God Himself could show you yourself in a mirror and you wouldn't believe Him. The thing you are most ignorant of is yourself.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:08:56 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting.


No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'.

It seems you are reading more into it than most do.
There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are.
But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was.
Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part.

I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique.


_____________________________

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:10:36 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up,
you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant.
And thats why you arent citing my posts that show
quote:



You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious.




Lucy, God Himself could show you yourself in a mirror and you wouldn't believe Him. The thing you are most ignorant of is yourself.

unlike god, you have nothing.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:11:43 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting.


No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'.

It seems you are reading more into it than most do.
There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are.
But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was.
Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part.

I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique.



Well not really because it is the M/s relationship itself that is important to me. The 'kink' part are just some tools that enhance the relationship.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:13:49 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up,
you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant.
And thats why you arent citing my posts that show
quote:



You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious.




Lucy, God Himself could show you yourself in a mirror and you wouldn't believe Him. The thing you are most ignorant of is yourself.

unlike god, you have nothing.


Keep telling yourself that, because you don't have the strength of character that allows for self-reflection.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:28:44 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them.
And you have no idea about my strength of character...
none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives)
WIthout proof, without cause and without truth

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:30:01 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them.
And you have no idea about my strength of character...
none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives)
WIthout proof, without cause and without truth


Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:36:01 PM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline 		Tamaka, I'm going to ask a few personal questions. If you aren't comfortable answering, or simply don't want to, no hard feelings.

Are you currently in a Master slave relationship?
If yes, how long?

If no, have you been collared, in the past as a slave? In real life, not online.
If yes, how long?
If more than once, how many times and how long each time?

I ask, because you are very self aware of who you are and what you are want/need.
Naturally I'm curious to learn a bit about your growth and how you came to identify as a slave.

Again, if you choose not to answer, no worries, no offense.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:44:51 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Tamaka, I'm going to ask a few personal questions. If you aren't comfortable answering, or simply don't want to, no hard feelings.

Are you currently in a Master slave relationship?
If yes, how long?

If no, have you been collared, in the past as a slave? In real life, not online.
If yes, how long?
If more than once, how many times and how long each time?

I ask, because you are very self aware of who you are and what you are want/need.
Naturally I'm curious to learn a bit about your growth and how you came to identify as a slave.

Again, if you choose not to answer, no worries, no offense.


Yes i am currently in a relationship. It has been one year.

I started in a Gorean M/s relationship for 2 years That was 10 years ago after i ended my 20 year vanilla marriage.

I was owned. by a BDSM severe sadist (probably the one true love of my life) for a year. That was also 24/7 and my first poly experience.

I was with a daddy dom type Master for 4 years.

I took a couple of years off to focus on myself.

Now i am in my current M/s relationship but we are not 24/7 at this time. It is also a poly relationship and He is awesome, but i am being more cautious this time because i don't have the resilience that i used to have.

It has been quite a growth process in every way. I would definitely say it is the Gorean community that really helped me understand myself, both the Men and the girls in that community. Unfortunately that group of people have disbanded over the years. I also am involved in yoga so the spiritual aspects are very important to me as well.


(in reply to WinsomeDefiance)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:52:28 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them.
And you have no idea about my strength of character...
none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives)
WIthout proof, without cause and without truth


Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood.


again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance.
you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts.
as your past 8 posts to me have proven.





_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:56:07 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them.
And you have no idea about my strength of character...
none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives)
WIthout proof, without cause and without truth


Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood.


again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance.
you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts.
as your past 8 posts to me have proven.






Like i said before, which you don't seem to grasp, the way you represent yourself here day in and day out confirms what i am saying. I understand your ignorance makes you uncapable of seeing it. There's nothing i can do to help you with that.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 5:58:11 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting.


No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'.

It seems you are reading more into it than most do.
There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are.
But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was.
Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part.

I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique.



Well not really because it is the M/s relationship itself that is important to me. The 'kink' part are just some tools that enhance the relationship.


And that is exactly what LP has said.
You are emotionally involved so the dynamic is important to you - just like LP said.
Anything else is icing on the cake and could be ignored because it has no catastrophic influence on your relationship.

And regardless of the dynamic, everyone has a choice.


_____________________________

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:03:19 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
You are not a dominant at all LP. You couldn't be dominant if your very life depended on it. Wearing a leather skirt and sticking a candle up someone's ass does not make you a dominant. You have no sense of responsibility. You are a disgrace to the community.


This means as much to me as random nonsense from people that scream how some people are not submissive because they won't acquiescence to other people's demands. Just like some people cast off that baloney about how somebody is not an s-type because they won't bow to other people's opinions. Please feel free to cast your aspirations of dominance because somebody doesn't bend to YOUR will and YOUR ideas.

I will tell you the same as I did the last person who, because I refused to do what they wanted...

Don't think I'm a Dominant? Cool. I'm a top. This releases me from YOUR expectations and I still get to engage in BDSM and have a damned good time.

It is, and has always been my opinion, that the limitus test of engaging in any of this stuff, it's a popularity contest or an opinion poll. Couldn't care less about the obligations you think I have to fulfill.

Of course, if wrapping people up to YOUR demands is what works for you, I won't say anything against it.

BDSM is NOT about emotional attachment if even ONE of the participants does not consent.




_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:04:38 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting.


No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'.

It seems you are reading more into it than most do.
There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are.
But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was.
Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part.

I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique.



Well not really because it is the M/s relationship itself that is important to me. The 'kink' part are just some tools that enhance the relationship.


And that is exactly what LP has said.
You are emotionally involved so the dynamic is important to you - just like LP said.
Anything else is icing on the cake and could be ignored because it has no catastrophic influence on your relationship.

And regardless of the dynamic, everyone has a choice.



LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:20:33 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that.


That wasn't what I said, AT ALL.

I'm an edge player in kink. I would be *mortified* if I were to ever be the responsible party to a physical deformity.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:21:08 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that.

That's not what she said. Read it carefully.

She said: I can promise you that I've had former s-types that, whether they lived or died, it wouldn't matter to me.
Note 'former', not the people she is playing with at the time.

I also have had friends in the past that I have no care about these days.
That's what LP said.

You have mis-read what she said and construed the meaning of it.


_____________________________

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:25:46 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them.
And you have no idea about my strength of character...
none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives)
WIthout proof, without cause and without truth


Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood.


again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance.
you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts.
as your past 8 posts to me have proven.






Like i said before, which you don't seem to grasp, the way you represent yourself here day in and day out confirms what i am saying. I understand your ignorance makes you uncapable of seeing it. There's nothing i can do to help you with that.


Ive been posting here for 10 years, Im not changing because you cannot handle my english idioms, syntax or expressions.
This forum is just a pleasure for me, not business, not legal, not academic, not strict. You have not shown one speck of anything to prove your dumb ignorance. Again
Its really pointless, but as you want to play silly games so bad. no matter your response, I will continue to seek some fact amongst your sad attempts.
I cant accept your opinion as valid because of what you are. Willfully ignorant.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:28:35 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that.


That wasn't what I said, AT ALL.

I'm an edge player in kink. I would be *mortified* if I were to ever be the responsible party to a physical deformity.


The lie is so blatant.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: LGBTK? - 5/6/2017 6:34:18 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline 		She's just pissed because I met you in real life and I deleted her BS email unread.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: LGBTK? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109