Wayward5oul
Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar quote:
ORIGINAL: InfoMan quote:
ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar I find it noticeable how people with school aged kids don't seem to have an issue with this concept, while it's childless people freaking out about how it's going to 'traumatize the poor kids'. I find it noticeable of the people who don't have an issue with this concept have admitted that their child/children suffer from a detrimental psychological or sociological problems... Such as mental issues, learning disorders, or split parentage through Divorce. They also seemingly paint themselves as some how having foreknowledge on this because of personal experience while simultaneously ignoring that the long term effects of this will influence them and their decisions for the rest of their children's lives. But no - that isn't the case because you asked your 10 year old what he/she thinks... and obviously some one that medically and scientifically doesn't have the mental faculties to perform such meta-analysis is clearly the best source of reliable information in this debate... right? Divorce is not a psychological or sociological problem, especially not when parents staying together would have created a hostile environment which would be detrimental to the welfare of the children. And neither of my kids suffers from sociological or psychological issues. My youngest was tested at having a 142 IQ. Due to this he's the 'head in the clouds' dreamer type, and the trivialities of personal organisation don't interest him, causing issues with him fitting into a cookie cutter mold school system which expects kids to be on par with each other. It's not a problem, or a detriment to him. It's an expression of him being a unique individual with his own challenges in life, just like everybody has. He will adapt to the challenges it poses him, though possibly not until he's free to leave school and dedicate himself fully to perusing his own interests instead of trying to fit himself to other's expectations. And yes, on this subject a 10 year old would be a better authority than an adult, considering that adults have a tendency to transfer their own mental and emotional issues onto children by teaching the children that things which the kids have no problems with are 'issues' by show of their own anxiety around the subject. The worse thing you could do in a situation like this is express your own neurosis to a child by making a big deal out of something the kid doesn't experience as an issue, because it's by that transferred and taught anxiety that the child will learn to form their own neurosis. IF receiving such a stamp is detrimental to the child's psychological welfare, it's because the adults around it teach the child that it should be concerned, anxious, and upset by such a thing. Teaching kids that they don't have to allow people to do something like this to them is a worthwhile lesson for adults to teach their kids. Now see that I could get on board with. I'm driving right now so I can't go into detail at this exact moment I'll come back to that but I think that's worth discussing.
|