kiwisub22 -> RE: Barbara Kay: No consequences for women who “stealth” men (5/13/2017 1:20:30 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: respectmen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tcng4ccVlVI&list=WL&index=3 "Stealth" is another whopper feminist double standard. In short, stealth refers to tricking someone into parenthood. If a man secretly pokes holes in his condom, he can be in big trouble. When a woman lies about taking birth control and gets pregnant and forces a man to be her financial slave, she will still get off scot free. I'm a little confused about your comparisons. You are comparing a man removing a condom mid-intercourse to a woman not taking birth control. So you are expecting women to monitor a mans compliance mid-coitus , and giving men a pass on contraception accountability. Sorry, but if you don't want children then you use birth control, IUD or condom, or any combination of birthcontrol of your choice. Which really means, if men don't want to have children they need to use condoms - AND realize that they aren't 100% sure. Yep, if you are in a long term relationship, using condoms would suck, but as a male, that is the only way of being absolutely sure that there is contraception in play. Your other choice is to trust the woman and really , really hope that you aren't one of the unlucky ones. Ya know, Maury has built a whole tv show around this premise. And for those of us who have watched it, there is a lot of men who don't understand the concept of "insert penis, and out comes baby". On the other hand, if you are female and your partner wants bareback after putting on a condom and you in the least enjoy or get lost in what you do, there isn't too much you can do about it. You could just mentally stay out of the action and watch him, but in that case, why even have sex. Pregnancy is just one of the outcomes of this situation - hep. c. and AIDS spring to mind. One can be prevented by birth control - the other two can't.
|
|
|
|