Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka It probably has to do with tribalism. Cultures/races that progressed were able to bring the masses together under leadership with a vision and got everyone together to support and work toward that vision. African tribes probably focused more on individual tribes and never all came together. Except Europe only managed to pull ahead of the Middle East and China when they developed nation states and started constantly battling each other. I'm pretty sure that the Africans had a way of life that suited them just fine, so they felt no need to change it. The thing is, they were probably right... all of our so-called progress has brought us closer to global extinction than we've ever been before. We'd all be a lot safer if we had just stayed in the woods. Vast Empires rose and dominated for 1000s of years in Africa. Mongolia conquered half the globe--on horseback. Ming China went protectionist, or Europe would never have caught up. The Middle East advanced science, astronomy, mathematics and philosophy at a time when Europe couldn't find its ass. Then they questioned the value of outer accomplishment and started to search within instead. Rome was once pretty much Europe. The Ottonians and the Francks had their turn too. The US rose in prominence primarily because Europe had two major wars on its own soil, severely setting back production, opening opportunities for American goods (an opportunity we squandered by treating it as our birthright instead of setting it aside as the windfall it was). Then there're the Aztec, Mayan, and Incan Empires. Tribalism has nothing to do with it. Empires rise, empires fall. The few hundred years we're talking about is nothing -- and even in that time, Holland and Portugal were world powers. Ebb and flow. Cycles over thousands of years. People and tribes come together, and fall apart again in time. Has nothing to do with race or culture. It's what humans do.
|