Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

How American Conservatives have changed.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> How American Conservatives have changed. Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/2/2017 7:25:15 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Funny thing, when you talk of global warming, climate change, acid rain and other issues, is that today, conservatives scream that it is a hoax, pseudo science or as Donald Trump has claimed, a conspiracy dreamed up by the Chinese.

However, the whole idea is not new.

President Johnson was told about global warming in 1965 by his science advisory panel and blew them off....

President Richard Nixon, R (CA) made the suggestion at a NATO conference in 1969 to establish a hub of research and initiatives of the organization in the civil area, dealing with environmental topics as Acid Rain and the Greenhouse effect. The suggestion of US President Richard Nixon was not very successful with the administration of German Chancellor Kurt Georg Kiesinger. But the topics and the preparation work done on the NATO proposal by the German authorities gained international momentum, (see e.g. the Stockholm United Nations Conference on the Human Environment 1970) as the government of Willy Brandt started to apply them on the civil sphere instead.

So basically, the first people saying that something should be done to stem the problem was an ultra conservative Republican President.

Of course it was President Reagan who negotiated the first international treaty and agreement dealing with the problem, the Montreal Protocol.

So, while conservatives disagreed on the solution to the problem, at one time, they agreed that there was a problem.

But hey, when all but 3 countries (before the US backed out) agreed that climate change is a problem, and that humans have some impact on making the problem worse or improving the situation, and the overwhelming agreement of climatologists (you know the people that actually study the climate as profession, as opposed to scientists from other fields disagreeing with the findings) as well as the majority of the people living on this planet agree that climate change is at least partially influenced by human production of green house gases, and only in the US is it a partisan issue and still hotly debated, then it is the conservatives in the US that are right and the rest of the people on the planet that are wrong.

But then when 8 people tell you that your house is on fire and 2 disagree telling you they are pushing a hoax and your house is not on fire, you only have yourself to blame if it turns out your house burned to the ground.

However, it is an undeniable fact that the hottest years on record have been the last five years.

It is also an undeniable fact that atmospheric concentrations of CO2 has risen dramatically since the start of the industrial revolution and mass global industrialization of the last century, as evidenced by ice cores from the northern and southern ice caps.

It is also an undeniable fact that in accordance with the record hottest years, the polar ice pack in the Arctic has retreated and for the first time the Northwest Passage is navigable most of the year.

It is also undeniable that the last two decades have seen record glacial retreat, and the glaciers that Glacier National Park was famous for are almost gone.

But hey, OJ Simpson got acquitted on the fact a blood saturated leather glove did not fit him, even though every person with a lick of common sense knows that leather shrinks when saturated with a liquid and then dries.

And so, it is entirely possible that with the overwhelming evidence proving climate change and human activity are linked, it is a hoax.

But the real funny fact is that there are alternatives to burning fossil fuels, and yes, I mean bio fuels, that would be carbon neutral (the carbon put in the atmosphere would be offset by growing the plants to make the fuel) and every thing that petroleum is used to make today can be made with bio produced oils.

Even funnier is that the oil industry produced reports on carbon emissions and climate change back in the 1970's and began to study alternatives then.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/2/2017 7:28:24 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
George Will: Trump has a 'dangerous disability'

Conservative Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist George F. Will joins Lawrence O'Donnell to discuss Donald Trump's "dangerous" inability "to think and speak clearly" and what Americans must do about it.

http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/george-will-trump-has-a-dangerous-disability-936881731734

It is urgent for Americans to think and speak clearly about President Trump’s inability to do either. This seems to be not a mere disinclination but a disability. It is not merely the result of intellectual sloth but of an untrained mind bereft of information and married to stratospheric self-confidence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-has-a-dangerous-disability/2017/05/03/56ca6118-2f6b-11e7-9534-00e4656c22aa_story.html?utm_term=.1c0864805448

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/2/2017 7:51:38 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Behold the three:
Syria
Nicaragua
America

You thread I do not understand please elaborate?





_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/2/2017 8:02:04 PM   
Tkman117


Posts: 1353
Joined: 5/21/2012
Status: offline
FR

While I've definitely come to find that some liberals are no saints themselves and even they can deny reality in favour of jumping on a bandwagon they don't fully understand, it's the way the conservatives do so in the face of something absolutely terrifying and something with so much evidence behind it that concerns me. Anything that poses a change or challenge to their current way of life is political, they don't see the benefits of change or the reasons why change is needed. They're in their tiny little bubble, ignorant of the world beyond they county, town, or state. They instead think people are out to get them, that the left is trying to screw them over. When in fact we're trying to help protect their ungrateful asses by ensuring they live in clean, comfortable environments with safe access to much needed resources. Wilful ignorance is the greatest sin mankind could ever commit, and while there is plenty of it across the political spectrum, the right seems to hold a higher majority in this case.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/2/2017 8:11:14 PM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
You are part of the way there...and?



_____________________________

wE arE tHe voiCes,
We SAtuRaTe yOur aLPHA brain WAveS, ThIs is nOt A DrEAm The wiZaRd of Oz, shoES, CaLcuLUs, DECorAtiNG, FrIDGE SProcKeTs, be VeRy sCareDed – SLoBbers,We DeEManDErs Sloowee DAnCiNG, SmOOches – whisper whisper & CaAkEE

(in reply to Tkman117)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 12:59:08 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
One is more kind when we do not attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. The right today in their discourse, has found malice toward to the left not only makes political points but profit from such malice in their media, books and journalism.

This situation with Trump is clearly an instance of the Dunning-Kruger effect in psychology, where the more ignorant a person is of a subject, the more strongly they believe in the correctness of their opinion.

Furthermore, concerning the American right (most conservatives) today, feel that for actual demonstrable expertise in some body of knowledge is to them...evidence of bias. I do not believe that a cure for this syndrome has ever been found.

The real shame of all this is as we concern ourselves with the environment, even if there is a contribution from known historical occurrences in mean global temperature changes, in the current case, rises, the science also informs that since the beginning of the industrial revolution, man does indeed contribute to the modification of the earth's natural carbon cycle. It is firmly understood in science that man must do all [he] can to stop. So.....

This modification is/was to be addressed in the Paris accord through man's collective and voluntary contributions toward minimizing human effect by reducing the two largest contributory uses, that of oil and coal.

In this effort BTW, China has been witness to the present choking of Beijing and other large cities which has caused them to eliminate a future 100 planned coal fired plants.

Coal employment and profits have been shrinking in the US for many years, predating our current and many past govt. policies. The very idea that new coal jobs will be created with Trump's recent action...defies the obvious facts within the marketplace. Gas is and will continue to replace coal no matter what policies the current admin. has on the environment.

Additionally, if govt. was to subsidize with say a "Manhattan-like' project as was done to invent a bomb almost whole cloth out of the energy found in uranium/plutonium/hydrogen, I say there is something to Tesla's theories on 'free energy' from the earth's magnetic/gravitational fields.

However, the fossil fuel industry with profits overruling pragmatism, we will not see such a project until almost all of the oil is burned. Let's hope we are all still breathing and working when that happens.



< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 6/4/2017 1:03:25 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:03:23 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Furthermore, concerning the American right (most conservatives) today, feel that for actual demonstrable expertise in some body of knowledge is to them...evidence of bias. I do not believe that a cure for this syndrome has ever been found.

I do wonder if any of the rightists afflicted by this bias insist on having a non-elitist with no expertise at all sorting out their dentistry if they have a cavity that needs filling or looking up their arse should their prostrate be ailing them.
Failing to eschew the experts for a folksy substitute who talks like them plain folks who ain't up themselves and has no interest in book learnin' in these cases is a repudiation of the republican contempt for expertise and scholarship, is it not?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:10:19 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Furthermore, concerning the American right (most conservatives) today, feel that for actual demonstrable expertise in some body of knowledge is to them...evidence of bias. I do not believe that a cure for this syndrome has ever been found.

I do wonder if any of the rightists afflicted by this bias insist on having a non-elitist with no expertise at all sorting out their dentistry if they have a cavity that needs filling or looking up their arse should their prostrate be ailing them.
Failing to eschew the experts for a folksy substitute who talks like them plain folks who ain't up themselves and has no interest in book learnin' in these cases is a repudiation of the republican contempt for expertise and scholarship, is it not?

You would be correct and the further shame is that past conservative intellectuals weren't like this and didn't suffer so much from this syndrome.


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:18:47 PM   
CaptR


Posts: 425
Joined: 4/25/2012
Status: offline
Not all of us are pleased with the current clowns choices. Not all of us are ignorant to the consequences. Not all of us eschew readin, writin and 'rithmatic.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:27:30 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

Not all of us are pleased with the current clowns choices. Not all of us are ignorant to the consequences. Not all of us eschew readin, writin and 'rithmatic.

I'd find that argument a bit more convincing if you hadn't first nominated and then elected somebody who does eschew intellectual virtues of any sort.
If all of the left are in favour of corruption, double dealing, scams and fraud over Clinton's nomination, then all of the right are mouth breathing retards who don't want anybody with a hint of a clue what they're doing in government, dig? You can't have one without the other, either both generalisations apply, or neither does.


_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:30:32 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and at the very least, I would have went with the traditional conservative 'rithmEtic.'

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:55:51 PM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Funny thing, when you talk of global warming, climate change, acid rain and other issues, is that today, conservatives scream that it is a hoax, pseudo science or as Donald Trump has claimed, a conspiracy dreamed up by the Chinese.


The problem is the Climate Change argument has stopped being a Scientific one and has since changed into a Political one.

Because the US is more polarized now then ever before - both sides have adopted such extreme positions to almost insane proportions. What's more - they have denounced and attack any one whom has any sort of reasonable middle ground view.


I do not believe in Man Made Global Warming.

Global Warming is occurring and the world is warming up - and with the amount of carbon we put into the atmosphere we are having an effect on this trend. But there is no conclusive proof that global warming is a man made product or that we have THAT much influence on our planet. It is more reasonable to say that the current Global Warming Trend is a Naturally Occurring Event which is Naturally Occurring in our life times.

So the stance i hold is that we must curb our rate of pollution through economic incentives and then set up things to prepare for the inevitable effects of a warming world, such as levee's, additional emergency disaster funding, sea walls, and more robust infrastructure that doesn't shut down at the hint of ill weather.

And this is actually a rather middle ground perspective... which i think coincides with many Republican Politicians.

The problem is - most will simply read the first line, and reply to that.
There is a Consensus! 97% agree! You're a Denialist! You're dooming us all!

It doesn't matter if my stance is middle ground... i am on the wrong side.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:57:32 PM   
InfoMan


Posts: 471
Joined: 2/20/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Funny thing, when you talk of global warming, climate change, acid rain and other issues, is that today, conservatives scream that it is a hoax, pseudo science or as Donald Trump has claimed, a conspiracy dreamed up by the Chinese.


The problem is the Climate Change argument has stopped being a Scientific one and has since changed into a Political one.

Because the US is more polarized now then ever before - both sides have adopted such extreme positions to almost insane proportions. What's more - they have denounced and attack any one whom has any sort of reasonable middle ground view.

I believe in Man Made Global Warming.

Our planet is a fragile interconnected system where even the smallest of things can have a very large impact. You'd need only look to a beaver dam - where the smallest collection of wood across what would seem like an insignificant section of flowing water can flood miles and miles of land up stream. And we have been pumping massive amounts of Carbon into the atmosphere. It doesn't matter if it is a drop in the bucket when compared to what the planet naturally deals with, just like the dam - what may seem insignificant can have massive repercussions, and we must be mindful of that.

My stance is that we must enact laws, and set up fines if one violates those laws, reducing and limiting the amount of pollutants we produce. And we must find and fund the creation of solutions to this problem, with incentives to clean energy, and anything which can reduce the carbon we've already released.

And this is actually a rather middle ground perspective... which i think coincides with many Democrat Politicians would suggest.

The problem is - most will read the first line and reply to only that.
There is no Conclusive Proof! Fake Science! Killing our Jobs! Bankrupting our Nation! You're dooming us all!

It doesn't matter if my stance is middle ground... i am on the wrong side

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 1:59:09 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan
Funny thing, when you talk of global warming, climate change, acid rain and other issues, is that today, conservatives scream that it is a hoax, pseudo science or as Donald Trump has claimed, a conspiracy dreamed up by the Chinese.

The problem is the Climate Change argument has stopped being a Scientific one and has since changed into a Political one.


Was it the left or the right who changed the argument into a political one?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 2:15:09 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
The interesting thing is that, a couple of generations ago, Conservatives were pro education and pro science.
Education meant that people were more likely to be gainfully employed and less likely to be on the streets criminally employed.
Science led to innovation.
Innovation led to new products.
New products led to more productivity.
More productivity led to higher profits for business and that led to Millionaires becoming Billionaires.

It seems that around 1980 or so, the Conservatives started becoming anti-science and more faith based.
They pulled money out of education because they discovered what various religions have known for millennia.
Ignorant people are easier to control.
Ignorant people are also less likely to challenge status quo as it pertains to the distribution of wealth in this nation.
The pie is only so big and the "old money families" don't want nouveau riches because that cuts into their part of the pie.

I'm sure that someone will now come and say "A rising tide raises all boats".
Anyone who says that has never seen a boat tied tightly to the dock at low tide.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 2:44:08 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

The interesting thing is that, a couple of generations ago, Conservatives were pro education and pro science.
Education meant that people were more likely to be gainfully employed and less likely to be on the streets criminally employed.
Science led to innovation.
Innovation led to new products.
New products led to more productivity.
More productivity led to higher profits for business and that led to Millionaires becoming Billionaires.

It seems that around 1980 or so, the Conservatives started becoming anti-science and more faith based.
They pulled money out of education because they discovered what various religions have known for millennia.
Ignorant people are easier to control.
Ignorant people are also less likely to challenge status quo as it pertains to the distribution of wealth in this nation.
The pie is only so big and the "old money families" don't want nouveau riches because that cuts into their part of the pie.

I'm sure that someone will now come and say "A rising tide raises all boats".
Anyone who says that has never seen a boat tied tightly to the dock at low tide.


It was the 'No Child Left Behind' thing that crushed the educational system in America.

On your idea that ignorant people are easier to control... it doesn't seem to be working quite that way.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 3:25:41 PM   
sloguy02246


Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
I'm sure that someone will now come and say "A rising tide raises all boats".
Anyone who says that has never seen a boat tied tightly to the dock at low tide.


True - and have you also noticed that whoever uses this analogy is always the person on a yacht, and not in a rowboat?

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 3:28:37 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
The correct saying is, "A rising tide lifts all ships"

(in reply to sloguy02246)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 4:45:03 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
even corrector. A rising tide lifts all boats.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: How American Conservatives have changed. - 6/4/2017 4:52:03 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: InfoMan


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Funny thing, when you talk of global warming, climate change, acid rain and other issues, is that today, conservatives scream that it is a hoax, pseudo science or as Donald Trump has claimed, a conspiracy dreamed up by the Chinese.


The problem is the Climate Change argument has stopped being a Scientific one and has since changed into a Political one.

Because the US is more polarized now then ever before - both sides have adopted such extreme positions to almost insane proportions. What's more - they have denounced and attack any one whom has any sort of reasonable middle ground view.

I believe in Man Made Global Warming.

Our planet is a fragile interconnected system where even the smallest of things can have a very large impact. You'd need only look to a beaver dam - where the smallest collection of wood across what would seem like an insignificant section of flowing water can flood miles and miles of land up stream. And we have been pumping massive amounts of Carbon into the atmosphere. It doesn't matter if it is a drop in the bucket when compared to what the planet naturally deals with, just like the dam - what may seem insignificant can have massive repercussions, and we must be mindful of that.

My stance is that we must enact laws, and set up fines if one violates those laws, reducing and limiting the amount of pollutants we produce. And we must find and fund the creation of solutions to this problem, with incentives to clean energy, and anything which can reduce the carbon we've already released.

And this is actually a rather middle ground perspective... which i think coincides with many Democrat Politicians would suggest.

The problem is - most will read the first line and reply to only that.
There is no Conclusive Proof! Fake Science! Killing our Jobs! Bankrupting our Nation! You're dooming us all!

It doesn't matter if my stance is middle ground... i am on the wrong side

A middle ground would be penalties and disincentives to continue on carbon based fuel with subsidies on alternatives. Subsidies on oil in its beginning were 4 and 5 times the assistance it enjoys
from govt. now.

The right instead fixes and one or so small bankruptcies in the solar market and the loan guarantees to which, which had nothing to do with that. The govt. let China fuck with our solar market, another factor that our founding 'conservative' fathers would have prevented.

But our politicians (righties) and businessmen are too greedy and short-sighted for that.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 6/4/2017 4:55:33 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to InfoMan)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> How American Conservatives have changed. Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109