Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion cuts to poor.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion cuts to poor. Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion cut... - 6/5/2017 12:00:44 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Trump said he was not elected to serve special interests, but instead, “the forgotten men and women of our country, and that’s what I’m doing.” His budget paints a starkly different picture, however, because it would shift trillions of dollars from struggling families to the wealthy.

At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, just two of President Trump’s tax breaks would give $2.5 trillion to corporations and the wealthy, while taking away $2.5 trillion in programs that benefit the elderly, the sick, working families with children, and the most vulnerable. This is the Robin Hood principle in reverse – taking from the poor and working people and giving to the very rich.

The economic theory embraced by the Trump budget, trickle-down economics, is and it has always been an abysmal failure and a fraud. This is a budget written by the billionaire class and is designed to benefit the billionaire class. Nothing more. Nothing less.

President Trump’s budget must be soundly defeated and replaced with a budget that meets the needs of working families, the elderly, the children, the sick and the poor - not just the 1 percent.

http://www.cbpp.org/blog/trump-plan-25-trillion-in-program-cuts-for-low-and-moderate-income-people-25-trillion-on-two
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 12:46:31 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11266
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline
Look into the situation in Venezuela, then rethink your insane Robin Hood mantra

Tax cuts merely allow citizens to keep their own money. That's a god thing. And the handouts that socialists are so proud of, are basically vote buying programs that victimize the poor by making them dependant on government

"Liberal" vote buying programs also harm the economy that everyone participates in by removing the money that is used to build and grow. Costs everyone jobs and opportunities

Socialist handouts looks good on paper in poor light perhaps, but in reality socialism wrecks everyone and everything it touches

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 12:49:35 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Look into the situation in Venezuela, then rethink your insane Robin Hood mantra

Tax cuts merely allow citizens to keep their own money. That's a god thing. And the handouts that socialists are so proud of, are basically vote buying programs that victimize the poor by making them dependant on government

"Liberal" vote buying programs also harm the economy that everyone participates in by removing the money that is used to build and grow. Costs everyone jobs and opportunities

Socialist handouts looks good on paper in poor light perhaps, but in reality socialism wrecks everyone and everything it touches


The fact of the matter though, is that we just don't have the need for enough jobs to keep everyone at full employment.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 12:52:52 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
1%, not citizens in the sense of "“the forgotten men and women of our country," and it's not a "god" thing.

Those horrible "socialist" policies have the US, 5% of global population, contributing 20% of global GDP. We do alright.

Trickle-down, however, has literally never worked. Even Reagan's top people admitted afterward it had been a failure.

But it DID show how to funnel money to your top donors. Those are the Trump/GOP "forgotten men and women."

Romney lost trying to implement an oligarchy. Hilary and the DNC lost trying to implement their own oligarchy.

Let's see what 2018 and 2020 bring.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 1:43:03 PM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

And the handouts that socialists are so proud of, are basically vote buying programs that victimize the poor by making them dependant on government


FFS why do people even bother arguing with you?
It is impossible to believe what you do while also being capable of informed debate.

Even modest attempts to spoonfeed you reality would be pointless.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 1:52:50 PM   
CaptR


Posts: 425
Joined: 4/25/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Look into the situation in Venezuela, then rethink your insane Robin Hood mantra

Tax cuts merely allow citizens to keep their own money. That's a god thing. And the handouts that socialists are so proud of, are basically vote buying programs that victimize the poor by making them dependant on government

"Liberal" vote buying programs also harm the economy that everyone participates in by removing the money that is used to build and grow. Costs everyone jobs and opportunities

Socialist handouts looks good on paper in poor light perhaps, but in reality socialism wrecks everyone and everything it touches

LBJ coined a very ugly and succinct phrase describing vote buying through social programs in the sixties.


< Message edited by CaptR -- 6/5/2017 2:17:35 PM >

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 1:57:26 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
If social programs are "vote buying," then, given a GOP White House and both branches of Congress, it doesn't work.

Any other silly nonsense?

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 1:59:47 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

If social programs are "vote buying," then, given a GOP White House and both branches of Congress, it doesn't work.

Any other silly nonsense?



Not to interrupt, but it would have worked if Bernie was the nominee.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 2:01:59 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
So anytime a Democrat is elected, it's vote buying, and every time Republicans win, it just didn't work that time?

Come on. Do you people hear yourselves?

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 2:08:45 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11266
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Look into the situation in Venezuela, then rethink your insane Robin Hood mantra

Tax cuts merely allow citizens to keep their own money. That's a god thing. And the handouts that socialists are so proud of, are basically vote buying programs that victimize the poor by making them dependant on government

"Liberal" vote buying programs also harm the economy that everyone participates in by removing the money that is used to build and grow. Costs everyone jobs and opportunities

Socialist handouts looks good on paper in poor light perhaps, but in reality socialism wrecks everyone and everything it touches

LBJ coined a very ugly but succinct phrase describing vote buying through social programs in the sixties.



He won that voting bloc over too

And destroyed them in the process, exactly as planned

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 2:30:42 PM   
CaptR


Posts: 425
Joined: 4/25/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

So anytime a Democrat is elected, it's vote buying, and every time Republicans win, it just didn't work that time?

Come on. Do you people hear yourselves?

Do yourself a favor and read. LBJ was a racist bully who knew putting minorities on the tit would keep them voting Democrat " for two hundred years." Look up what he said to Thurgood Marshall when he appointed him, or what he called the civil Rights act. I'm curious where you're from there's no crime or ugly Democrats?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 2:36:26 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Look into the situation in Venezuela, then rethink your insane Robin Hood mantra

Tax cuts merely allow citizens to keep their own money. That's a god thing. And the handouts that socialists are so proud of, are basically vote buying programs that victimize the poor by making them dependant on government

"Liberal" vote buying programs also harm the economy that everyone participates in by removing the money that is used to build and grow. Costs everyone jobs and opportunities

Socialist handouts looks good on paper in poor light perhaps, but in reality socialism wrecks everyone and everything it touches

LBJ coined a very ugly and succinct phrase describing vote buying through social programs in the sixties.


Please recount that for us, in context with credible citation

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 2:39:05 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Do yourself a favor and stop believing you're the only reader in America -- or on this forum.

Then do yourself another favor and realize that LBJ's bullying and racism isn't driving the poor Trump/GOP budget choices.

Then still another one where you realize that clearly the strategy didn't work. Take a look at actual results. How did all these Republicans win???

Do yourself a final favor and look at what has worked and what has not -- trickle down no, progressive tax system yes.

We already know how to be prosperous. And we know how to explode deficits and exacerbate class economic problems.

Guess which one this is. Given your posts so far, then guess again.

(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 3:05:38 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
FR to the OP.
He's a politician and he is doing the same thing that virtually every politician at the national level does.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 3:14:27 PM   
CaptR


Posts: 425
Joined: 4/25/2012
Status: offline
Again I'm not a fan of Trump. No it's not going to work but then neither does more taxation funding more social programs. Which is what was done in the sixties to cement that voter base. I'll hand it to Bill Clinton he attacked the deficit but he sold the American farm to do it. How did Trump get elected? Look what you put up against him! The most distrusted human being you could find. You tell me how Trump got elected it sure wasn't because a bunch of rednecks got together and voted the good old boy in. It was because the alternative was going to be an even bigger disaster.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 3:21:36 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0ahUKEwim68He3afUAhWF7iYKHfrJDSUQFghHMAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.donaldjtrump.com%2Ftrump-tax-reform.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGuB1ObRH7looFD_V_rrA1g9cCwiw&sig2=VsTiHVXE10-IratEjruWaw

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 3:25:41 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
You got any money back yet?

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 3:26:19 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

Again I'm not a fan of Trump. No it's not going to work but then neither does more taxation funding more social programs. Which is what was done in the sixties to cement that voter base. I'll hand it to Bill Clinton he attacked the deficit but he sold the American farm to do it. How did Trump get elected? Look what you put up against him! The most distrusted human being you could find. You tell me how Trump got elected it sure wasn't because a bunch of rednecks got together and voted the good old boy in. It was because the alternative was going to be an even bigger disaster.

See, 1) no one's proposing more taxation funding more social programs in this budget;
2) clearly, that base is not cemented, giving a government overrun with Republicans;
3) I had nothing to do with Hilary, and in fact, worked hard to prevent her being there -- nor did I vote for her as a lesser evil, since either choice was going to be a disaster (just different in kind).
4) the 60s DID partially resolve the severity of the poverty problem in the US (and the economy thrived all the same).

Meanwhile, back at the Trump/GOP budget, they are funneling money to the top 1% at the expense of the poverty.

THAT'S the topic. Not all the tangents to pretend it's not what's happening.


(in reply to CaptR)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 3:42:41 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptR

Again I'm not a fan of Trump. No it's not going to work but then neither does more taxation funding more social programs. Which is what was done in the sixties to cement that voter base. I'll hand it to Bill Clinton he attacked the deficit but he sold the American farm to do it. How did Trump get elected? Look what you put up against him! The most distrusted human being you could find. You tell me how Trump got elected it sure wasn't because a bunch of rednecks got together and voted the good old boy in. It was because the alternative was going to be an even bigger disaster.

See, 1) no one's proposing more taxation funding more social programs in this budget;
2) clearly, that base is not cemented, giving a government overrun with Republicans;
3) I had nothing to do with Hilary, and in fact, worked hard to prevent her being there -- nor did I vote for her as a lesser evil, since either choice was going to be a disaster (just different in kind).
4) the 60s DID partially resolve the severity of the poverty problem in the US (and the economy thrived all the same).

Meanwhile, back at the Trump/GOP budget, they are funneling money to the top 1% at the expense of the poverty.

THAT'S the topic. Not all the tangents to pretend it's not what's happening.




Why would they be funneling money back to the top 1%? What possible reasons could they have as a motivation to do that?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion... - 6/5/2017 4:07:21 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
It's hard to believe you are actually that naïve.

But if you are, look up trickle down theory and paying off your big campaign donors.

And not to forget that Trump himself would benefit financially, as would his companies and his families' companies.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Trump/GOP: $2.5 trillion for top 1%; $2.5 trillion cuts to poor. Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.111