Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 7:57:20 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		when you are deliberately confusing the two matters, you dont get a response, you get laughed at.
You are the one clutching because you believe only one question was what people were waiting for the answer too.
you have a huge problem thinking logically.


btw, check out what mccain said to coats.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:02:45 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Comey isn't in this thread at all. You wrote "Coats" and my reply and the news headline I posted is about Coats.

The failure is all yours (and the Fake News Washington Post's), crow man




Comey isn't in this thread at all????

Ummm....

Look at the thread subject. I should know. *I* am the one who started this thread.

The failure is most certainly yours.



From your OP:

quote:



Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia

Ok... It's getting BEYOND DRIP DRIP DRIP

It's getting to be GUSH GUSH GUSH

Dan Coats: A real NAMED source testifies TOMORROW. That alone is clearly Obstruction of Justice.


Coats testified today that the exact opposite of what the Washington Post reported is true. Admit it like a man and stop being so childish and silly

You are being easily misled by the nose, by a megacorporation-owned newspaper that has zero respect for journalism, much less the truth - and a political agenda designed specifically to further the business interests of its gazillionaire owner Jeffery Bezos






_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:08:29 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


US intelligence chief 'never felt pressured' by Trump

Clearly you have been misled by your official DNC propaganda rags...



Clearly you have been misled by your own hype. "Never feeling pressured" is COMPLETELY mutually exclusive of being asked to get Comey to stop investigating (the original WP reporting).

I am sorry you fail to understand the difference, but it is huge.

I know you are gleefully applauding like a giddy schoolgirl because you thought you caught the WP in "fake news", but in reality, it is your hyper-partisan hype that is leading you there.


Comey isn't in this thread at all. You wrote "Coats" and my reply and the news headline I posted is about Coats.

The failure is all yours (and the Fake News Washington Post's), crow man



Comey is in the TITLE of the thread.............DUMBASS

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:18:00 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Comey is in the TITLE of the thread.............DUMBASS


Childishness

The name alone is, though the premise is Coats' testimony about what the President told Coats to tell Comey, and that he would testify that the president thereby tried to obstruct justice

Another Washington Post lie, one of many

That you need this spelled out at this point proves beyond a doubt that you are an utter imbecile

Though, that you are an imbecile has never been in doubt

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:20:29 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2367
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Comey isn't in this thread at all. You wrote "Coats" and my reply and the news headline I posted is about Coats.

The failure is all yours (and the Fake News Washington Post's), crow man




Comey isn't in this thread at all????

Ummm....

Look at the thread subject. I should know. *I* am the one who started this thread.

The failure is most certainly yours.



From your OP:

quote:



Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia

Ok... It's getting BEYOND DRIP DRIP DRIP

It's getting to be GUSH GUSH GUSH

Dan Coats: A real NAMED source testifies TOMORROW. That alone is clearly Obstruction of Justice.


Coats testified today that the exact opposite of what the Washington Post reported is true. Admit it like a man and stop being so childish and silly

You are being easily misled by the nose, by a megacorporation-owned newspaper that has zero respect for journalism, much less the truth - and a political agenda designed specifically to further the business interests of its gazillionaire owner Jeffery Bezos








You still fail to understand that Coats did not testify at ALL regarding what the Washington Post story reported. All he said was that he "never felt pressured"

There is just a HUGE disconnect from the facts in your hyper-partisan mind.

The Washington Post never reported anything about Coats' feelings.


Whenever you are faced with plain simple facts such as these, you return to your hyper-partisan anti-WaPo rhetoric. Perfect example: You falsely and erroneously claim that "Comey isn't in this thread at all", ignoring the obvious fact that he is part of the subject of the thread itself.

You falsely invent a mutual exclusivity between what the WaPo reported that Coats SAID and what Coats testified about he felt.

That is because you simply can't or won't understand the difference. Instead, it's more of the same "WaPo / Fake News" rhetoric.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:24:49 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online 		You are so determined to remain ignorant

What did you breathlessly preach in your OP that Coats would say today, and what did he actually say about that very subject

Did he say what your propaganda rag predicted or not



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:37:08 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
From my linked BBC article above:

quote:



The US director of national intelligence has said he "never felt pressured" to influence the inquiry into Russia's political meddling.

Dan Coats also told a Senate panel he did not think it was "appropriate" to discuss his conversations with the president at a public hearing.

His comments follow a report that President Donald Trump asked him to derail the Russia investigation.

The National Security Agency chief also declined to comment on the matter.

Admiral Mike Rogers told a Senate intelligence committee on Wednesday he has never "been directed to do anything illegal, immoral, unethical or inappropriate" as NSA director.


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:40:23 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2367
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

You are so determined to remain ignorant

What did you breathlessly preach in your OP that Coats would say today, and what did he actually say about that very subject

Did he say what your propaganda rag predicted or not





Read my OP. I said (breathfully, BTW), Dan Coats: A real NAMED source testifies TOMORROW.

What did he actually say on that VERY subject? it would be inappropriate to publicly discuss his White House talks with Trump

I don't read propaganda rags. That is your thing.

The WaPo made no prediction, and neither did I.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 8:48:50 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
I will help you remember more accurately

From your OP, what Coats would say (DRIP DRIP DRIP GUSH GUSH GUSH)

quote:

Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia

Ok... It's getting BEYOND DRIP DRIP DRIP

It's getting to be GUSH GUSH GUSH

Dan Coats: A real NAMED source testifies TOMORROW. That alone is clearly Obstruction of Justice.


Where is the "Obstruction of Justice" - you talk a big game, but you keep coming up empty

Coats said he did not feel pressured to do anything of the sort. You are determined to PRETEND that means something other than the real world meaning

There was no pressure like the WaPo claimed

The WaPo claimed he was pressured

Coats said BS, no

He also said he has learned to not believe what the Post prints

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0mt9_2-6tA

It is simple, it is plain, and it is obvious

You have to make it far more complicated than it is because you are the worst kind of blind ideologue, and the only way you can remain faithful is through these grotesque distortions of reality


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 9:06:51 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2367
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


I will help you remember more accurately

From your OP, what Coats would say (DRIP DRIP DRIP GUSH GUSH GUSH)

quote:

Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia

Ok... It's getting BEYOND DRIP DRIP DRIP

It's getting to be GUSH GUSH GUSH

Dan Coats: A real NAMED source testifies TOMORROW. That alone is clearly Obstruction of Justice.


Where is the "Obstruction of Justice" - you talk a big game, but you keep coming up empty

Coats said he did not feel pressured to do anything of the sort. You are determined to PRETEND that means something other than the real world meaning

There was no pressure like the WaPo claimed

The WaPo claimed he was pressured

Coats said BS, no

He also said he has learned to not believe what the Post prints

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0mt9_2-6tA

It is simple, it is plain, and it is obvious

You have to make it far more complicated than it is because you are the worst kind of blind ideologue, and the only way you can remain faithful is through these grotesque distortions of reality



Do you even read what you post? Or the post you are even quoting? Or the very article you are referencing?

That's reinforces my point. You ignore obvious demonstrable facts in favor of your hyper-partisan rhetoric.

1) My OP makes NO prediction whatsoever on what Coats would say in his testimony.
2) The WaPo article makes no claim whatsoever that Coats was pressured (Did you even bother to read it?)
3) Coats never said that the WaPo's article was BS. He said it was inappropriate for him to discuss his conversations with the President.
4) Coats said that he never felt pressured. The WaPo never claimed that he DID feel pressured.

These are obvious and demonstrable facts. You keep choosing to ignore them.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 9:15:19 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
AGAIN - where is the "obstruction of justice" proof you were so sure would (in your own words) "GUSH GUSH GUSH"

You didn't write that either?


_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 9:20:45 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2367
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


AGAIN - where is the "obstruction of justice" proof you were so sure would (in your own words) "GUSH GUSH GUSH"

You didn't write that either?



I meant that the frequency of news has moved from DRIP DRIP DRIP to GUSH GUSH GUSH.

As for Obstruction of Justice:

1. Let's see if Coats testifies about what was actually SAID (maybe in closed session)
2. More importantly it is plainly demonstrated in Comey's advanced written testimony. (See other thread)

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 9:28:38 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online 		FR

The main topic today wasn't anything a hack rag like the WP would headline

Because of Obamas illegal spying on Tfumpz campaign and illegally unmasking citizens associatied with Trump, FISA renewal is in doubt

That is the only real scandal here, and the only crimes that are known to have been committed

And that's what the hearing today was really about

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/7/2017 9:30:06 PM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online 		Always tomorrow

ThTs litery what you posted yesterday

And tomorrow never comes



_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/8/2017 5:02:25 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline 		Tomorrow never knows.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UjvdZm-Tu8

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/8/2017 5:18:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

FR

Because of Obamas illegal spying on Tfumpz campaign and illegally unmasking citizens associatied with Trump, FISA renewal is in doubt


please show a source for that?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/8/2017 5:32:18 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11260
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online
Google news results for 'fisa, inmasking':

https://www.google.com/search?q=fisa+unmasking&oq=fisa+unmasking&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l2.4544j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=fisa+unmasking&tbm=nws

It is very in-your-face, but go ahead and pretend you can't see it

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/8/2017 5:40:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		So, lots of asswipe from the nutsucker slobberblogs.............perhaps you 'can get in our face' rather than in Il Douchovitches ass by quoting us the relevant statute where unmasking is illegal, and evidence that the unmasking was done illegally, hell, start with who was unmasked. Show us the document.

Nope, didnt think so.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/8/2017 8:24:35 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


AGAIN - where is the "obstruction of justice" proof you were so sure would (in your own words) "GUSH GUSH GUSH"

You didn't write that either?



I meant that the frequency of news has moved from DRIP DRIP DRIP to GUSH GUSH GUSH.

As for Obstruction of Justice:

1. Let's see if Coats testifies about what was actually SAID (maybe in closed session)
2. More importantly it is plainly demonstrated in Comey's advanced written testimony. (See other thread)

As I understand it, it seems that two individuals of good character, substance and integrity - Comey and Coats - have both reported conversations with POTUS that if true, constitute prima facie evidence of obstruction of justice, an impeachable offence.

Whether they actually amount to obstruction of justice will no doubt be decided in an appropriate venue at some stage in the future. But as things stand, the allegations have been independently advanced and to an extent, they corroborate each other (unless one chooses to believe that Comey and Coats have entered into a conspiracy to defame POTUS). They therefore constitute genuine evidence of wrongdoing.

Therefore to deny that there is a prima facie case to answer, or that there is no evidence of wrongdoing is simply wrong - it flies in the face of what has been revealed to date.

_____________________________



(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back... - 6/8/2017 8:32:27 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


AGAIN - where is the "obstruction of justice" proof you were so sure would (in your own words) "GUSH GUSH GUSH"

You didn't write that either?



I meant that the frequency of news has moved from DRIP DRIP DRIP to GUSH GUSH GUSH.

As for Obstruction of Justice:

1. Let's see if Coats testifies about what was actually SAID (maybe in closed session)
2. More importantly it is plainly demonstrated in Comey's advanced written testimony. (See other thread)

It seems that two individuals of substance and integrity - Comey and Coats - have both reported conversations with POTUS that if true, constitute prima facie evidence of obstruction of justice, an impeachable offence.

Whether they actually amount to obstruction of justice will no doubt be decided in an appropriate venue at some stage in the future. But as things stand, the allegations have been independently advanced and to an extent, they corroborate each other (unless one chooses to believe that Comey and Coats have entered into a conspiracy to defame POTUS). They therefore constitute genuine evidence of wrongdoing.

Therefore to deny that there is a prima facie case to answer, or that there is no evidence of wrongdoing is simply wrong - it flies in the face of what has been revealed to date.

Big words that mean nothing. I hope one day you take your head out of your ass. The saying of which does not constitute prima facia evidence of anything except my hope. Do you feel pressured now? Your problem is, like all alt-left idiots, that you make up a conclusion, in this case that there is prima facia evidence for impeachment despite all evidence to the contrary, and then fill in an argument around it. It's bad thinking, again like normal alt-left idiocy. All your argument reveals is that you have a delusional, but robust, desire to twist everything to your prime idiocy.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dan Coats says Trump asked him to get Comey to back off Russia Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109