quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

It seems that two individuals of substance and integrity - Comey and Coats - have both reported conversations with POTUS that if true, constitute prima facie evidence of obstruction of justice, an impeachable offence.

Whether they actually amount to obstruction of justice will no doubt be decided in an appropriate venue at some stage in the future. But as things stand, the allegations have been independently advanced and to an extent, they corroborate each other (unless one chooses to believe that Comey and Coats have entered into a conspiracy to defame POTUS). They therefore constitute genuine evidence of wrongdoing.

Therefore to deny that there is a prima facie case to answer, or that there is no evidence of wrongdoing is simply wrong - it flies in the face of what has been revealed to date.

Big words that mean nothing. I hope one day you take your head out of your ass. The saying of which does not constitute prima facia evidence of anything except my hope. Do you feel pressured now? Your problem is, like all alt-left idiots, that you make up a conclusion, in this case that there is prima facia evidence for impeachment despite all evidence to the contrary, and then fill in an argument around it. It's bad thinking, again like normal alt-left idiocy. All your argument reveals is that you have a delusional, but robust, desire to twist everything to your prime idiocy.